Skip to main content

Art in the Machine: Value Misalignment and AI “Art”

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (CDVE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14166))

Abstract

Why have online artist communities largely rejected AI image generators when they have embraced other technologies? We focus on cooperative design and community values to first frame these communities as digital counterculture akin to transformative fandom. Then, we use this framework to explore the online art community’s core principles in order to surface four key values (accessibility, distributed mentoring, gift economy, and authenticity), and illustrate their fundamental disconnect with the values espoused by advocates of current AI image generators. Finally, we conclude with suggestions for human and value-centered design of these technologies in collaborative creative visual communities to prevent similar unintended consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Foley, J.: DALL-E 2 Access is Now Open to Everyone, and that’s Kind of Terrifying. https://www.creativebloq.com/news/dalle2-access-open-to-all

  2. Vincent, J.: Stable Diffusion made Copying Artists and Generating Porn Harder and Users are Mad. https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/24/23476622/ai-image-generator-stable-diffusion-version-2-nsfw-artists-data-changes

  3. Xiang, C., Maiberg, E.: ISIS Executions and Non-Consensual Porn Are Powering AI Art. https://www.vice.com/en/article/93ad75/isis-executions-and-non-consensual-porn-are-powering-ai-art

  4. Edwards, B.: Artist Finds Private Medical Record Photos in Popular AI Training Data Set. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/09/artist-finds-private-medical-record-photos-in-popular-ai-training-data-set/

  5. Plunkett, L.: AI Creating “Art” Is An Ethical and Copyright Nightmare. https://kotaku.com/ai-art-dall-e-midjourney-stable-diffusion-copyright-1849388060

  6. Heikkilä, M.: This Artist is Dominating AI-Generated Art. And he’s not Happy about it. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/09/16/1059598/this-artist-is-dominating-ai-generated-art-and-hes-not-happy-about-it/

  7. van Baarle, L.: Untitled Post. https://blog.loish.net/post/703723938473181184/theres-a-protest-going-on-against-ai-art-over-on (2022)

  8. Lum, M.: Say no to AI Generated Art in the Exhibitors and... (2022) https://twitter.com/PuccaNoodles/status/1591896706509336576

  9. Ki: Say no to AI art (2022). https://gawki.tumblr.com/post/703770072741707776/i-felt-the-need-to-share-here-as-well-say-no-to

  10. Lee, D.J.: Untitled Post (2022). https://jdebbiel.tumblr.com/post/703480889851756544/my-works-got-stolen-last-week-and-were-used-to

  11. Barnett, M.: Slightly Against Aligning with Neo-Luddites (2022). https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9MZdwQ7u53oaRiBYX/slightly-against-aligning-with-neo-luddites

  12. Bourke, B.: Positionality: Reflecting on the Research Process. TQR (2014). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1026

  13. Campbell, J., Aragon, C., Davis, K., Evans, S., Evans, A., Randall, D.: Thousands of positive reviews: distributed mentoring in online fan communities. In: Proc of the 19th ACM Conf. on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 691–704. ACM, San Francisco California USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aragon, C., Davis, K.: Writers in the Secret Garden: Fanfiction, Youth, and New Forms of Mentoring. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans, S., et al.: More Than peer production: fanfiction communities as sites of distributed mentoring. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 259–272. ACM, Portland Oregon (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, M.X., Tang, W.W.W., Lo, K.W.K., Lau, C.K., Ngai, G., Chan, S.: MelodicBrush: a novel system for cross-modal digital art creation linking calligraphy and music. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 418–427. ACM, Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs, J., Mellis, D., Zoran, A., Torres, C., Brandt, J., Tanenbaum, T.J.: Digital craftsmanship: HCI Takes on technology as an expressive medium. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 57–60. ACM, Brisbane QLD Australia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke, R., Briggs, J., Light, A., Wright, P.: Situated encounters with socially engaged art in community-based design. In: Proc of the 2016 ACM Conf on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 521–532. ACM, Brisbane QLD Australia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perkel, D.: Making art, Creating Infrastructure: DeviantART and the Production of the Web (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lingel, J.: Digital Countercultures and the Struggle for Community. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolfson, T.: Digital Rebellion: The Birth of the Cyber Left. University of Illinois Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jenkins, H.: Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manifold, M.C.: Enchanting tales and imagic stories: the educational benefits of fanart making. Art Educ. 66, 12–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer, R.: Art of RJ Palmer. https://www.rj-palmer.com

  25. Allred, A.M., Gray, C.M.: “Be gay, do crimes”: the co-production and activist potential of contemporary fanzines. Proceedings ACM Hum.-Computational Interaction 5, 1–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3479520

  26. kreftropod: [insufficient] (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. catallenakat: Giselle (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Honora, L.C.: Kim Kitsuragi 2 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wacom: Wacom Cintiq: creative pen display. https://www.wacom.com/en-us/products/pen-displays/wacom-cintiq

  30. Huion: Huion HS64 Android Drawing Tablet for Beginners. https://store.huion.com/products/huion-hs64

  31. Adobe: Compare plans for individuals, students & teams, https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/compare-plans.html

  32. Collins, A.: Personal Communication (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Literat, I.: Distributed Creativity on the Internet: A Theoretical Foundation for Online Creative Participation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. penwiper: Untitled Post (2019). https://penwiper.tumblr.com/post/189251630312/so-a-couple-days-ago-some-folks-braved-my

  35. Sunny: Untitled Post (2022). https://www.instagram.com/p/CkFDL2nLfn0/

  36. Nguyễn, B.: palace wizard (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyễn, B.: cờ ngũ sắc (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyễn, B.: Personal Communication

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shrigley, D.: He Plays Very Badly but it Stops Him from Destroying Things (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chayka, K.: Is A.I. Art Stealing from Artists?. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/is-ai-art-stealing-from-artists (2023)

  41. Dixit, P.: “It’s Gross To Me”: The Trio Of Artists Suing AI Art Generators Speaks Out. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/ai-art-generators-lawsuit-stable-diffusion-midjourney

  42. Hsu, J.: Why Use of AI is a Major Sticking Point in the Ongoing Writers’ Strike. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2373382-why-use-of-ai-is-a-major-sticking-point-in-the-ongoing-writers-strike/

  43. McKay, T.: I Want That on a T-Shirt, gizmodo.com/i-want-that-on-a-t-shirt-1840273177

  44. Shan, S., Cryan, J., Wenger, E., Zheng, H., Hanocka, R.: Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry (2023). https://glaze.cs.uchicago.edu/

  45. Weatherbed, J.: ArtStation is Hiding Images that Protest Against AI art. https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/23/23523864/artstation-removing-anti-ai-protest-artwork-censorship

  46. Edwards, B.: Artists Stage Mass Protest Against AI-Generated Artwork on ArtStation – Ars Technica. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/12/artstation-artists-stage-mass-protest-against-ai-generated-artwork/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyse Marie Allred .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Allred, A.M., Aragon, C. (2023). Art in the Machine: Value Misalignment and AI “Art”. In: Luo, Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14166. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43815-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43815-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43814-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43815-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics