Skip to main content

Invited Paper: How Do Humans Succeed in Tasks Like Proving Fermat’s Theorem or Predicting the Higgs Boson?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14310))

  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

I discuss issues of inverting feasibly computable functions, optimal discovery algorithms, and the constant overheads in their performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is a complete problem, i.e. all other inversion problems are reducible to it.

References

  1. Baker, T.P., Gill, J., Solovay, R.: Relativizations of the P = NP question. SIComp 4(4), 431–442 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, S.: The complexity of theorem proving procedures. In: STOC-1971, pp. 151–158 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dekhtiar, M.: On the impossibility of eliminating exhaustive search in computing a function relative to its graph. Russ. Proc. USSR Acad. Sci. 14, 1146–1148 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karp, R.M.: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller, R.E., Thatcher, J.W. (eds.) Complexity of Computer Computations, pp. 85–103. Plenum (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolmogorov, A.N., Uspenskii, V.A.: On the definition of an algorithm. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 13(4), 3–28 (1958). AMS Transl. 1963. 2nd ser. 29:217–245

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levin, L.A.: Универсальные Задачи Перебора (1973). (in Russian) [Universal search problems]. Probl. Inf. Transm. 9(3), 115–116. English Translation in [9]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levin, L.A.: Universal heuristics: how do humans solve “unsolvable” problems? In: Dowe, D.L. (ed.) Algorithmic Probability and Friends. Bayesian Prediction and Artificial Intelligence. LNCS, vol. 7070, pp. 53–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44958-1_3. Also in a CCR/SIGACT Workshop Report “Visions for Theoretical Computer Science”

  9. Trakhtenbrot, B.A.: A survey of Russian approaches to perebor (brute-force search) algorithms. Ann. Hist. Comput. 6(4), 384–400 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Levin, L.A. (2023). Invited Paper: How Do Humans Succeed in Tasks Like Proving Fermat’s Theorem or Predicting the Higgs Boson?. In: Dolev, S., Schieber, B. (eds) Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems. SSS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14310. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44274-2_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44274-2_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44273-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44274-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics