Skip to main content

Towards Making the Most of LLM for Translation Quality Estimation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14302))

  • 1520 Accesses

Abstract

Machine Translation Quality Estimation (QE) aims to evaluate the quality of machine translation without relying on references. Recently, Large-scale Language Model (LLM) has made major breakthroughs, and has shown excellent zero-shot ability on various natural language processing tasks. However, its application on QE is non-trivial and has not yet been explored. In this work, we aim to exploit the translation estimation ability of LLM, and propose an unsupervised QE framework via exploring the useful information that can be extracted from the LLM. We firstly formulate QE in a machine translation template, and derive the sequence-level probabilities as the translation estimation result. Moreover, we exploit the uncertainty of LLM as another QE evidence, by randomize the LLM with different demonstrations and prompts, and obtain the variance. We evaluate our method on WMT’22 QE data, and achieve high correlation with human judgments of quality, rivalling state-of-the-art supervised QE models. We also provide in-detailed analysis on the ability of LLM on QE task.

H. Huang—Contribution during internship at ByteDance Inc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noticed that we did not use any released checkpoint provided by these quality estimation systems, since we want to make a fair comparison in the same data setting, and it is not clear what data augmentation technique is used in training their checkpoints.

  2. 2.

    https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/mjpost/sacrebleu.

References

  1. Bang, Y., et al.: A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of chatgpt on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrault, L., et al.: Findings of the 2020 conference on machine translation (WMT20). In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Machine Translation, pp. 1–55. Association for Computational Linguistics, November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  3. Behnke, H., Fomicheva, M., Specia, L.: Bias mitigation in machine translation quality estimation. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1475–1487. Association for Computational Linguistics, May 2022

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blatz, J., et al.: Confidence estimation for machine translation. In: COLING 2004: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 315–321. COLING, Aug 23-Aug 27 2004

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conneau, A., et al.: Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 8440–8451. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (Jun 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fomicheva, M., et al.: Unsupervised quality estimation for neural machine translation. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics 8, 539–555 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fonseca, E., Yankovskaya, L., Martins, A.F.T., Fishel, M., Federmann, C.: Findings of the WMT 2019 shared tasks on quality estimation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Machine Translation (Volume 3: Shared Task Papers, Day 2), pp. 1–10. Association for Computational Linguistics, August 2019

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gal, Y., Ghahramani, Z.: Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059. PMLR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Han, L., Jones, G.J., Smeaton, A.F.: Translation quality assessment: a brief survey on manual and automatic methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03311 (2021)

  11. Kocmi, T., Federmann, C.: Large language models are state-of-the-art evaluators of translation quality (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kocoń, J., et al.: Chatgpt: Jack of all trades, master of none (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, G., Hou, B., Mandalika, A., Lee, J., Choudhury, S., Srinivasa, S.S.: Bayesian policy optimization for model uncertainty (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liang, P., et al.: Holistic evaluation of language models (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lommel, A., Uszkoreit, H., Burchardt, A.: Multidimensional quality metrics (MQM): a framework for declaring and describing translation quality metrics. Tradumàtica 12, 0455–0463 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu, Q., Qiu, B., Ding, L., Xie, L., Tao, D.: Error analysis prompting enables human-like translation evaluation in large language models: a case study on chatgpt (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Min, S., et al.: Rethinking the role of demonstrations: what makes in-context learning work? In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 11048–11064. Association for Computational Linguistics, December 2022

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311–318. Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2002. https://doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073135

  19. Peng, K., et al.: Towards making the most of chatgpt for machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13780 (2023)

  20. Qin, C., Zhang, A., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Yasunaga, M., Yang, D.: Is chatgpt a general-purpose natural language processing task solver? (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ranasinghe, T., Orasan, C., Mitkov, R.: TransQuest: translation quality estimation with cross-lingual transformers. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 5070–5081. International Committee on Computational Linguistics (Dec 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rei, R., Stewart, C., Farinha, A.C., Lavie, A.: COMET: a neural framework for MT evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 2685–2702. Association for Computational Linguistics, November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H., et al.: The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 3(4), 333–389 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sun, S., Guzmán, F., Specia, L.: Are we estimating or guesstimating translation quality? In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 6262–6267. Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2020

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, K., Shi, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Zheng, X.: Beyond glass-box features: uncertainty quantification enhanced quality estimation for neural machine translation. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pp. 4687–4698. Association for Computational Linguistics, Novenber 2021

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, S., Liu, Y., Wang, C., Luan, H., Sun, M.: Improving back-translation with uncertainty-based confidence estimation. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 791–802. Association for Computational Linguistics (Nov 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao, Y., Wang, W.Y.: Quantifying uncertainties in natural language processing tasks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 7322–7329 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zerva, C., et al.: Findings of the WMT 2022 shared task on quality estimation. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Machine Translation (WMT), pp. 69–99. Association for Computational Linguistics, December 2022

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, B., Haddow, B., Birch, A.: Prompting large language model for machine translation: a case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07069 (2023)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Key R &D Program of China (2020AAA0108000, 2020AAA0108005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (62276077, U1908216), Key R &D Program of Yunnan (202203AA080004) and Shenzhen College Stability Support Plan (No. GXWD20220811170358002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muyun Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huang, H. et al. (2023). Towards Making the Most of LLM for Translation Quality Estimation. In: Liu, F., Duan, N., Xu, Q., Hong, Y. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. NLPCC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14302. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44693-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44693-1_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44692-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44693-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics