Skip to main content

Annotation Quality Measurement in Multi-Label Annotations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14303))

  • 791 Accesses

Abstract

Annotation quality measurement is crucial when building a supervised dataset for either general purpose research or domain applications. Inter-rater agreement measure is one of the most vital aspects in terms of establishing annotation quality. The traditional inter-rater agreement measures cannot address the issue in multi-label scenario. To adapt to multi-label annotations, the recent research has developed a bootstrapping method to measure the level of agreement between two raters. In this paper we propose a fine-grained multi-label agreement measure MLA, which attends to discover slight differences in inter-rater agreement across different annotations when multiple raters are involved. We demonstrate its compatibility with traditional measures through mathematics and experiments. The experimental results show it can interpret the agreement more accurately and consistently with intuitive understanding. In addition, a toolset is provided to enable users to generate the multi-label annotations that mimic different annotators, and calculate various agreement coefficients for several scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The common expression of Krippendorff’s alpha is the diversity-based expression, it can be transformed into the form of Eq. 1.

  2. 2.

    Krippendorff’S alpha’s embrace of other methods is not our focus, some papers have discussed on it [12].

References

  1. PaddlePaddle AI studio. https://aistudio.baidu.com/aistudio/datasetdetail/181754

  2. Liu, W.W., Wang, H.B., Shen, X.B., Tsang, I.W.: The emerging trends of multi-label learning, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2011.11197 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, D., Shi, Y., Tsang, I.W., Ong, Y.S., Gong, C., Shen, X.B.: A survey on multi-output learning, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1901.00248 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 20(1), 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott, W.: Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opin. Q. 19(3), 321–325 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76(5), 378–382 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, J.: Weighed kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull. 70(4), 213–220 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krippendorff, K.: Computing krippendorff’s alpha-reliability. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43. Accessed 25 Jan 2011

  9. Marchal, M., Scholman, M., Yung, F., Demberg, V.: Establishing annotation quality in multi-label annotations. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 3659–3668, International Committee on Computational Linguistics, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ji, A.Y., et al.: Abstract visual reasoning with tangram shapes. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 582–601, Association for Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beck, C., Booth, H., El-Assady, M., Butt, M.: Representation problems in linguistic annotations: ambiguity, variation, uncertainty, error and bias. In: 14th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 60–73, Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zapf, A., Castell, S., Morawietz, L., Karch, A.: Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 16, 93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zettersten, M., Lupyan, G.: Finding categories through words: more nameable features improve category learning. Cognition 196, 104135 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Passonneau, R.: Measuring agreement on set-valued items (MASI) for semantic and pragmatic annotation. Communicative Events, Columbia University New York, New York, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammadreza, H., Doyle, T.E., Samavi, R.: MLCM: multi-label confusion matrix. IEEE Access 10, 19083–19095 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, Y., Kim, J.M., Akata, Z., Lee, J.: Large loss matters in weakly supervised multi-label classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14136–14146 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank all the anonymous reviewers and chairs for their meaningful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheng Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, S. et al. (2023). Annotation Quality Measurement in Multi-Label Annotations. In: Liu, F., Duan, N., Xu, Q., Hong, Y. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. NLPCC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14303. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44696-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44696-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44695-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44696-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics