Skip to main content

Abstract

Developing fair and unbiased models is important for good scientific practice and clinical utility. This paper delves into the specific biases associated with artificial intelligence (AI) in neuroimaging research, and highlights the structural issues that underpin them. We propose a range of mitigation strategies, encompassing both behavioural and technical considerations. By recognising these challenges, we can encourage more accurate and equitable insights into neuroimaging research.

S. A. Martin, F. Biondo and B. Taylor—These authors contributed equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aghili, M., Tabarestani, S., Adjouadi, M.: Addressing the missing data challenge in multi-modal datasets for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. Methods 375, 109582 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bethlehem, R.A.I., et al.: Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature 604(7906), 525–533 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhopal, K.: Gender, ethnicity and career progression in UK higher education: a case study analysis. Res. Pap. Educ. 35(6), 706–721 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biondo, F., et al.: Brain-age is associated with progression to dementia in memory clinic patients. NeuroImage Clin. 36, 103175 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron, J.J., Stinson, D.A.: Gender (mis)measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 13(11), e12506 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carneiro, D., Veloso, P.: Ethics, transparency, fairness and the responsibility of artificial intelligence. In: de Paz Santana, J.F., de la Iglesia, D.H., López Rivero, A.J. (eds.) DiTTEt 2021. AISC, vol. 1410, pp. 109–120. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87687-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, I.Y., et al.: Ethical machine learning in healthcare. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 4(1), 123–144 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Z., et al.: Evaluation of risk of bias in neuroimaging-based artificial intelligence models for psychiatric diagnosis: a systematic review. JAMA Netw. Open 6(3), e231671–e231671 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diedrichsen, J., et al.: A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 46(1), 39–46 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drukker, K., et al.: Toward fairness in artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: identification and mitigation of potential biases in the roadmap from data collection to model deployment. J. Med. Imaging 10(6), 061104 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan, N.W.: Geographical and economic influences on neuroimaging modality choice. Center for Open Science (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fabbri, A., et al.: The influence of industry sponsorship on the research agenda: a scoping review. Am. J. Public Health 108(11), e9–e16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fry, A., et al.: Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186(9), 1026–1034 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganguli, M., et al.: Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study. Brain Imaging Behav. 9(2), 204–212 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33(2–3), 61–83 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hlávka, J.P.: Chapter 10 - Security, Privacy, and Information-Sharing Aspects of Healthcare Artificial Intelligence, pp. 235–270. Academic Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoddinott, P., et al.: How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Res 7, 752 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holla, B., et al.: A series of five population-specific Indian brain templates and atlases spanning ages 6–60 years. Hum. Brain Mapp. 41(18), 5164–5175 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui, A., et al.: Exploring the impacts of organisational structure, policy and practice on the health inequalities of marginalised communities: Illustrative cases from the UK healthcare system. Health Policy 124(3), 298–302 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iglesias, J.E., et al.: SynthSR: a public AI tool to turn heterogeneous clinical brain scans into high-resolution T1-weighted images for 3D morphometry. Sci. Adv. 9(5), eadd3607 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kenfack, P.J., et al.: Learning fair representations through uniformly distributed sensitive attributes. In: 2023 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML), pp. 58–67 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kusnoor, S.V., et al.: Design and implementation of a massive open online course on enhancing the recruitment of minorities in clinical trials - faster together. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 21(1), 1–11 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lara, M.A.R., et al.: Addressing fairness in artificial intelligence for medical imaging. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 4581 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Longino, H.E.: The Fate of Knowledge. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. McLane, H.C., et al.: Availability, accessibility, and affordability of neurodiagnostic tests in 37 countries. Neurology 85(18), 1614–22 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moseson, H., et al.: The imperative for transgender and gender nonbinary inclusion: beyond women’s health. Obstet. Gynecol. 135(5), 1059–1068 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Murray, D.L., et al.: Bias in research grant evaluation has dire consequences for small universities. PLoS ONE 11(6), e0155876 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Natale, V., Rajagopalan, A.: Worldwide variation in human growth and the World Health Organization growth standards: a systematic review. BMJ Open 4(1), e003735 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ricard, J.A., et al.: Confronting racially exclusionary practices in the acquisition and analyses of neuroimaging data. Nat. Neurosci. 26(1), 4–11 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rieke, N., et al.: The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Dig. Med. 3(1), 119 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Showunmi, V.: Visible, invisible: Black women in higher education. Front. Sociol. 8, 974617 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Starke, G., De Clercq, E., Elger, B.S.: Towards a pragmatist dealing with algorithmic bias in medical machine learning. Med. Health Care Philos. 24(3), 341–349 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Suresh, H., Guttag, J.: A framework for understanding sources of harm throughout the machine learning life cycle. Association for Computing Machinery (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  34. The MIT Press: A conversation with Dr. Stephen M. Smith, editor-in-chief of imaging neuroscience (2023). https://mitpress.mit.edu/a-conversation-with-dr-stephen-m-smith-editor-in-chief-of-imaging-neuroscience/

  35. UKRI: Consequences of the 2021 ODA Budget Cuts: Key Findings. UKRI ODA Review (2022). https://www.ukri.org/publications/consequences-of-the-2021-oda-budget-cuts-key-findings-report/

  36. Wald, L.L., et al.: Low-cost and portable MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 52(3), 686–696 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wee, C.Y., et al.: Cortical graph neural network for AD and MCI diagnosis and transfer learning across populations. NeuroImage Clin. 23, 101929 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wen, J., et al.: Convolutional neural networks for classification of Alzheimer’s disease: overview and reproducible evaluation. Med. Image Anal. 63, 101694 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiener, M., Sommer, F.T., Ives, Z.G., Poldrack, R.A., Litt, B.: Enabling an open data ecosystem for the neurosciences. Neuron 92(3), 617–621 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank members of the Centre for Medical Image Computing, UCL and the Dementia Research Centre, UCL, for interesting and insightful discussions which helped shape this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie A. Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martin, S.A., Biondo, F., Cole, J.H., Taylor, B. (2023). Brain Matters: Exploring Bias in AI for Neuroimaging Research. In: Wesarg, S., et al. Clinical Image-Based Procedures, Fairness of AI in Medical Imaging, and Ethical and Philosophical Issues in Medical Imaging. CLIP EPIMI FAIMI 2023 2023 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45249-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45249-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45248-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45249-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics