Skip to main content

Normative Monitoring Using Bayesian Networks: Defining a Threshold for Conflict Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14294))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Normative monitoring of black-box AI systems entails detecting whether input-output combinations of AI systems are acceptable in specific contexts. To this end, we build on an existing approach that uses Bayesian networks and a tailored conflict measure called IOconfl. In this paper, we argue that the default fixed threshold associated with this measure is not necessarily suitable for the purpose of normative monitoring. We subsequently study the bounds imposed on the measure by the normative setting and, based upon our analyses, propose a dynamic threshold that depends on the context in which the AI system is applied. Finally, we show the measure and threshold are effective by experimentally evaluating them using an existing Bayesian network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even without including context, there can be various reasons why \(o^*\) need not be the most likely value of O given \(\textbf{i}\) in \({\Pr }^N\), for one thing because the normative model is not designed to make predictions regarding the value of O.

  2. 2.

    Available from https://www.bnlearn.com/bnrepository/discrete-medium.html.

  3. 3.

    The experiment was executed using the GeNIe Modeler and the SMILE Engine by BayesFusion, LLC (http://www.bayesfusion.com/).

References

  1. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., Kumar, V.: Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(3), 1–58 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen, F.V., Chamberlain, B., Nordahl, T., Jensen, F.: Analysis in HUGIN of data conflict. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 546–554 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Johansson, F., Falkman, G.: Detection of vessel anomalies - a Bayesian network approach. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, pp. 395–400. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kirk, A., Legg, J., El-Mahassni, E.: Anomaly detection and attribution using Bayesian networks. Technical report, Defence Science and Technology Organisation Canberra (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kjaerulff, U.B., Madsen, A.L.: Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5104-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, T.D., Jensen, F.V.: On-line alert systems for production plants: a conflict based approach. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 45, 255–270 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Onnes, A.: Monitoring AI systems: a problem analysis, framework and outlook. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Hybrid-Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 354, pp. 238–240 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Onnes, A., Dastani, M., Renooij, S.: Bayesian network conflict detection for normative monitoring of black-box systems. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth FLAIRS Conference, vol. 36. Florida Online Journals (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Dawid, A.P., Lauritzen, S.L., Cowell, R.G.: Bayesian analysis in expert systems. Statist. Sci. 8, 219–247 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Hybrid Intelligence Centre, a 10-year programme funded by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science through the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, https://hybrid-intelligence-centre.nl.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annet Onnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Onnes, A., Dastani, M., Renooij, S. (2024). Normative Monitoring Using Bayesian Networks: Defining a Threshold for Conflict Detection. In: Bouraoui, Z., Vesic, S. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45607-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45608-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics