Skip to main content

Exploring the Influence of Technology Use on Teleworking Benefits: A Gender Multigroup Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2023)

Abstract

The contribution of technology in the context of the COVID-19 crisis has had a reasonably disruptive effect on the organization of work, creating a new generation of employees willing to telework more. However, this trend is also a concern for gender inequality in the workplace that existed before the crisis. This study investigates the gender gap in the influence of technology use on job autonomy, job satisfaction, well-being, and intention to continue teleworking. A sample of 500 teleworkers, 250 men and 250 women, was tested using the PLS-SEM method. The results show a gender gap in the influence of technology use on job satisfaction, and in the effect of job autonomy on the intention to continue teleworking. Technology use had more influence on job satisfaction for women, while well-being had more influence on job satisfaction for men. However, technology use did not affect the intention to continue teleworking for both genders, as did job autonomy for men. Women show a higher intent to continue teleworking compared to men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Çoban, S.: Gender and telework: Work and family experiences of teleworking professional, middle-class, married women with children during the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey. Gend. Work. Organ. 29(1), 241–255 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dias, P., Lopes, S., Peixoto, R.: Mastering new technologies: does it relate to teleworkers’ (in)voluntariness and well-being? J. Knowl. Manag. 26(10), 2618–2633 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. González-Sánchez, G., Olmo-Sánchez, M.I., Maeso-González, E.: Challenges and strategies for post-COVID-19 gender equity and sustainable mobility. Sustainability 13(5), 2510 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodríguez Pérez, R.E., Ramos, R.: How has teleworking highlighted gender differences in mexico in the face of COVID-19?. In: The Economics of Women and Work in the Global Economy, 1st edn., pp 13–39. Routledge (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16(2), 250–279 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diab-Bahman, R., Al-Enzi, A.: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on conventional work settings. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 40(9/10), 909–927 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Halliday, C.S., Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., Ordóñez, Z., Rogelberg, S.G., Zhang, H.: Autonomy as a key resource for women in low gender egalitarian countries: a cross-cultural examination. Hum. Resour. Manage. 57(2), 601–615 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. House, R.J., Wigdor, L.A.: Herzberg’s dual-factor theory of job satisfaction and motivation: a review of the evidence and a criticism. Pers. Psychol. 20(4), 369–389 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, Z., Savani, K.: Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender Manag.: Int. J. 35(7/8), 719–736 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2020-0202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dartey-Baah, K., Quartey, S.H., Osafo, G.A.: Examining occupational stress, job satisfaction and gender difference among bank tellers: evidence from Ghana. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 69(7), 1437–1454 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Donati, S., Viola, G., Toscano, F., Zappalà, S.: Not all remote workers are similar: technology acceptance, remote work beliefs, and wellbeing of remote workers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(22) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212095

  12. Song, Y., Gao, J.: Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. J. Happiness Stud. 21(7), 2649–2668 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00196-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beckel, J.L.O., Fisher, G.G.: Telework and worker health and well-being: a review and recommendations for research and practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(7) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073879

  14. Davies, A.: COVID-19 and ICT-supported remote working: opportunities for rural economies. World 2(1), 139–152 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/world2010010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinert, C., Maier, C., Laumer, S.: Why are teleworkers stressed? An empirical analysis of the causes of telework-enabled stress. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings 2015, pp 1407–1421 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lepold, A., Tanzer, N., Bregenzer, A., Jiménez, P.: The efficient measurement of job satisfaction: facet-items versus facet scales. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(7) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071362

  17. Ab Wahab, M., Tatoglu, E.: Chasing productivity demands, worker well-being, and firm performance. Pers. Rev. 49(9), 1823–1843 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2019-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoemann, A.M., Boulton, A.J., Short, S.D.: Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8(4), 379–386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Memon, M.A., Chuah, F., Ting, H.: Multigroup analysis using smartPLS: step-by-step guidelines for business research. Asian J. Bus. Res. 10(3), 1–19 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Robert Kala Kamdjoug .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ndassi Teutio, A.O., Kala Kamdjoug, J.R. (2024). Exploring the Influence of Technology Use on Teleworking Benefits: A Gender Multigroup Analysis. In: Rocha, A., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Colla, V. (eds) Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 801. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45648-0_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics