Skip to main content

Exploring Potential Drivers of Citizen’s Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Use in e-Government

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 801))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 103 Accesses

Abstract

The current advancement of information technologies has created the conditions to introduce and popularize e-government, bringing citizens closer to public administration. Yet, e-government faces challenges such as the digital divide, civic data overload, lack of trust in government institutions and their online services. Artificial intelligence has the potential to address many of those challenges but also raises ethical, privacy, and security concerns. Which requires that before successfully adopting such a disruptive technology, it is imperative to delve into the drivers leading to citizens’ acceptance first. Consequently, this study proposes an empirical model to explore and better understand the citizens’ acceptance towards the use of AI in e-government. We used an online survey to collect data (N = 208). The results reveal that the perceived usefulness and trust of AI and social influence significantly contribute to the acceptance of AI use in e-government. Despite the majority being aware of AI and e-government, some are not or are not aware of how AI can be used in e-government. The findings of this study can help local and national governments assess the acceptance of the adoption of AI-based technologies in e-government and define tailored strategies to respond to citizens’ concerns and highlight benefits to society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stone, P., et al.: One hundred year study on artificial intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Twentyman, J.: Intelligent economies: AI’s transformation of industries and societies (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Council of Europe: Ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) Feasibility Study (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berryhill, J., Heang, K.K., Clogher, R., McBride, K.: Hello, world: artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector. OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI)., pp.1–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1787/726fd39d-en

  5. EY, Microsoft: Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: European Outlook for 2020 and Beyond. Microsoft (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Savaget, P., Chiarini, T., Evans, S.: Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence. Sci. Public Policy 46, 369–380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. König, P.D., Wenzelburger, G.: Opportunity for renewal or disruptive force? How artificial intelligence alters democratic politics. Govern. Inf. Q. 37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101489

  8. Fast, E., Horvitz, E.: Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In: 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2017, pp. 963–969 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. OECD: The Case for E-Government: Excerpts from the OECD Report The E-Government Imperative. OECD J. Budget. 3, 1987–1996 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra, S.S., Geleta, A.T.: Can an E-government system ensure citizens’ satisfaction without service delivery? Int. J. Public Adm. 43, 242–252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. le Blanc, D.: E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends. DESA Working Paper. Though the goal of realising citizen centricity ha (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, K., Aitamurto, T.: Barriers for crowd’s impact in crowdsourced policymaking: civic data overload and filter hierarchy. Int. Public Manag. J. 22, 99–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1488780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toots, M.: Why E-participation systems fail: the case of Estonia’s Osale.ee. Govern. Inf. Q. 36, 546–559 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.002

  14. Arana-Catania, M., et al.: Citizen participation and machine learning for a better democracy. Digit. Govern.: Res. Pract. 2, 1–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3452118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Mushayt, O.S.: Automating E-government services with artificial intelligence. IEEE Access 7, 146821–146829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.C., Salem, F.: Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: a systematic literature review and a research agenda. Govern. Inf. Q. 101577 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577

  17. van Ittersum, K., Rogers, W., Capar, M.: Understanding technology acceptance: phase 1–literature review and qualitative model development. Technology Report …. 0170, 1–123 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Belanche, D., Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C.: Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 119, 1411–1430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Albarrán Lozano, I., Molina, J.M., Gijón, C.: Perception of artificial intelligence in Spain. Telematics Inform. 63, 101672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nadarzynski, T., Miles, O., Cowie, A., Ridge, D.: Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: a mixed-methods study. Digit. Health 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619871808

  22. Kelley, P.G., et al.: Exciting, useful, worrying, futuristic: public perception of artificial intelligence in 8 countries. In: AIES 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 627–637. Virtual Event (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462605

  23. Cho, S.H., Oh, S.Y., Rou, H.G., Gim, G.Y.: A study on the factors affecting the continuous use of e-government services - focused on privacy and security concerns -. In: Proceedings - 20th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, SNPD 2019, pp. 351–361. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2019.8935693

  24. Araujo, T., et al.: In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. 35, 611–623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w

  25. Gesk, T.S., Leyer, M.: Artificial intelligence in public services: when and why citizens accept its usage. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lichtenthaler, U.: Extremes of acceptance: employee attitudes toward artificial intelligence. J. Bus. Strateg. 41, 39–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2018-0204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bitkina, O.V., Jeong, H., Lee, B.C., Park, J., Park, J., Kim, H.K.: Perceived trust in artificial intelligence technologies: a preliminary study. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 30, 282–290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6, 144–176 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, Y.N.K., Wen, C.H.R.: Impacts of attitudes toward government and corporations on public trust in artificial intelligence. Commun. Stud. 72, 115–131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Starke, C., Marcinkowski, F., Wintterlin, F.: Social networking sites, personalization, and trust in government: empirical evidence for a mediation model (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913885

  31. Gefen, D.: E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega (Westport) 28, 725–737 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baek, T., Morimoto, M.: Stay away from me. J. Advert. 41, 59–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367410105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Boerman, S.C., Kruikemeier, S., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.J.: Exploring motivations for online privacy protection behavior: insights from panel data. Communic Res. 48, 953–977 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218800915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LaRose, R., Rifon, N.J.: Promoting i-safety: effects of privacy warnings and privacy seals on risk assessment and online privacy behavior. J. Consum. Aff. 41, 127–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00071.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bhattacherjee, A.: Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. - Part A: Syst. Hum. 30, 411–420 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.852435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pechar, E., Bernauer, T., Mayer, F.: Beyond political ideology: the impact of attitudes towards government and corporations on trust in science. Sci. Commun. 40, 291–313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018763970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marcinkowski, F., Starke, C.: Trust in government: what’s news media got to do with it? Stud. Commun. Sci. 18, 87–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2018.01.006

  38. Starke, C., Lünich, M.: Artificial intelligence for political decision-making in the European union: effects on citizens’ perceptions of input, throughput, and output legitimacy. Data Policy 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2020.19

  39. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plann. 46, 1–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jöreskog, K.G.: Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika 36, 409–426 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Castañeda, J.A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., Luque, T.: Web Acceptance model (WAM): moderating effects of user experience. Inf. Manage. 44, 384–396 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mijail Naranjo-Zolotov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moreira, J., Naranjo-Zolotov, M. (2024). Exploring Potential Drivers of Citizen’s Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Use in e-Government. In: Rocha, A., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Colla, V. (eds) Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 801. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45648-0_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics