Skip to main content

Improving Automated Prostate Cancer Detection and Classification Accuracy with Multi-scale Cancer Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (MLMI 2023)

Abstract

Automated detection of prostate cancer via multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) could help radiologists in the detection and localization of cancer. Several existing deep learning-based prostate cancer detection methods have high cancer detection sensitivity but suffer from high rates of false positives and misclassification between indolent (Gleason Pattern = 3) and aggressive (Gleason Pattern \(\ge \) 4) cancer. In this work, we propose a multi-scale Decision Prediction Module (DPM), a novel lightweight false-positive reduction module that can be added to cancer detection models to reduce false positives, while maintaining high sensitivity. The module guides pixel-level predictions with local context information inferred from multi-resolution coarse labels, which are derived from ground truth pixel-level labels with patch-wise calculation. The coarse label resolution varies from a quarter size and 16 times smaller, to a single label for the whole slice, indicating that the slice is normal, indolent, or aggressive. We also propose a novel multi-scale decision loss that supervises cancer prediction at each resolution. Evaluated on an internal test set of 56 studies, our proposed model, DecNet, which adds the DPM and multi-scale loss to the baseline model SPCNet, significantly increases precision from 0.49 to 0.63 (\(p \le 0.005\) in paired t-test) while keeping the same level of sensitivity (0.90) for clinically significant cancer predictions. Our model also significantly outperforms U-Net in sensitivity and Dice coefficient (\(p \le 0.05\) and \(p \le 0.005\), respectively). As shown in the appendix, a similar trend was found when validating with an external dataset containing multi-vendor MRI exams. An ablation study on different label resolutions of the DPM shows that decision loss at all three scales achieves the best performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson, D.C., et al.: Detection of individual prostate cancer foci via multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Urol. 75(5), 712–720 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya, I., et al.: Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework. Med. Image Anal. 75, 102288 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, R., et al.: Joint prostate cancer detection and Gleason score prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(11), 2496–2506 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2901928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) Computer Vision-ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11–14 October 2016, Proceedings, Part IV 14, vol. 9908, pp. 630–645. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38

  5. Hosseinzadeh, M., Saha, A., Brand, P., Slootweg, I., de Rooij, M., Huisman, H.: Deep learning-assisted prostate cancer detection on bi-parametric MRI: minimum training data size requirements and effect of prior knowledge. Eur. Radiol. 32, 2224–2234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08320-y

  6. Hu, J., Shen, L., Sun, G.: Squeeze-and-excitation networks, pp. 7132–7141 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nyúl, L., Udupa, J., Zhang, X.: New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19(2), 143–150 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.836373

  8. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2015, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Rusu, M., et al.: Registration of presurgical MRI and histopathology images from radical prostatectomy via RAPSODI. Med. Phys. 47(9), 4177–4188 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryu, H.S., et al.: Automated Gleason scoring and tumor quantification in prostate core needle biopsy images using deep neural networks and its comparison with pathologist-based assessment. Cancers 11(12), 1860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saha, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., Huisman, H.: End-to-end prostate cancer detection in BPMRI via 3D CNNs: effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction. Med. Image Anal. 73, 102155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102155, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841521002012

  12. Seetharaman, A., et al.: Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging. Med. Phys. 48(6), 2960–2972 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2022. Cancer J. Clin. 72(1), 7–33 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonn, G.A., et al.: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging interpretation varies substantially across radiologists. Eur. Urol. Focus 5(4), 592–599 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.010, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456917302663

  15. Yu, X., et al.: False positive reduction using multiscale contextual features for prostate cancer detection in multi-parametric MRI scans. In: 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1355–1359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098338

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Departments of Radiology and Urology at Stanford University, and by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R37CA260346). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Xinran Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 174 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, C.X. et al. (2024). Improving Automated Prostate Cancer Detection and Classification Accuracy with Multi-scale Cancer Information. In: Cao, X., Xu, X., Rekik, I., Cui, Z., Ouyang, X. (eds) Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. MLMI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14348. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45673-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45673-2_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45672-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45673-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics