Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most preventable causes of death. Periodic testing, seconded by precursors such as living habits, heritage, and exposure to specific materials, help healthcare providers achieve early detection, a desirable scenario that positively correlates with survival. However, the currently available diagnosing mechanisms have a great opportunity of improvement in terms of invasiveness, sensitivity and timing before patients reach advanced stages with a significant probability of metastasis. Supervised artificial intelligence enables early diagnosis and excludes patients from unpleasant biopsies. In this work, we gathered information about methodologies, techniques, metrics, and benchmarks to accomplish early prostate cancer detection, including pipelines with associated patents and knowledge transfer mechanisms, intending to find the reasons precluding the solutions from being massively adopted in the standards of care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., et al.: Global cancer observatory: cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (2020)
Elmore, S.: Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 35(4), 495–516 (2007)
World Cancer Research Fund International: Prostate cancer statistics. Cancer Trends, Prostate cancer statistics (2023)
World Health Organization: Cancer. World Health Organization Fact Sheet, Detail, Cancer (2022)
Prostate Cancer Foundation. About prostate cancer. About Prostate Cancer (2023)
Urology Care Foundation. Prostate cancer-early-stage. Urology Health Organization (2023)
Carter, H.B., Albertsen, P.C., Barry, M.J., et al.: Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J. Urol. 190, 419 (2013)
Filella, X., et al.: Prostate cancer screening: guidelines review and laboratory issues. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 57(10), 1474–1487 (2019)
The American Cancer Society medical and editorial content team. Prostate cancer early detection, diagnosis, and staging. Cancer A-Z, Prostate Cancer, p. 10 (2019)
Humphrey, P.A.: Histopathology of prostate cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med. 7(10), a030411 (2017)
The American Cancer Society medical and editorial content team. Prostate cancer early detection, diagnosis, and staging. Cancer A-Z, Prostate Cancer, p. 24:25 (2019)
Weinreb, J.C., et al.: PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur. Urol. 69(1), 16–40 (2016)
The American Cancer Society medical and editorial content team. Prostate cancer early detection, diagnosis, and staging. Cancer A-Z, Prostate Cancer, p. 26 (2019)
Herman, G.T.: Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projections. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-723-7
The American Cancer Society medical and editorial content team. Prostate cancer early detection, diagnosis, and staging. Cancer A-Z, Prostate Cancer, p. 23 (2019)
National Cancer Institute. NCI dictionary of cancer terms. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms, p. G (2023)
Wei, Yu., Zhou, L.: Early diagnosis of prostate cancer from the perspective of Chinese physicians. J. Cancer 11(11), 3264 (2020)
Gurina, T.S., Simms, L.: Histology, Staining. SataPearls Publishing-Europe PMC (2020)
Kitchenham, B.A., Dyba, T., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 273–281. IEEE (2004)
Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., Rolland, C.: Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requirements Eng. 11(1), 102–107 (2006)
Salvador, S., Florencia, P.-C., Fernando, Y.C.: Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer using artificial intelligence. A systematic literature review. Extraction and Summary Forms (2023)
Bourbonne, V., et al.: External validation of an MRI-derived radiomics model to predict biochemical recurrence after surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Cancers 12(4), 814 (2020)
de Vente, C., Vos, P., Hosseinzadeh, M., Pluim, J., Veta, M.: Deep learning regression for prostate cancer detection and grading in bi-parametric MRI. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 68(2), 374–383 (2021)
Javadi, G., et al.: Characterizing the uncertainty of label noise in systematic ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. In: 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 424–428. IEEE (2021)
Liu, Q., Dou, Q., Yu, L., Heng, P.A.: MS-net: multi-site network for improving prostate segmentation with heterogeneous MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39(9), 2713–2724 (2020)
Jia, H., et al.: 3D APA-net: 3D adversarial pyramid anisotropic convolutional network for prostate segmentation in MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39(2), 447–457 (2019)
Schömig-Markiefka, B., et al.: Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology. Mod. Pathol. 34(12), 2098–2108 (2021)
Comelli, A., et al.: Deep learning-based methods for prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging. Appl. Sci. 11(2), 782 (2021)
Tian, Z., et al.: Graph-convolutional-network-based interactive prostate segmentation in MR images. Med. Phys. 47(9), 4164–4176 (2020)
Karimi, D., Nir, G., Fazli, L., Black, P.C., Goldenberg, L., Salcudean, S.E.: Deep learning-based Gleason grading of prostate cancer from histopathology images-role of multiscale decision aggregation and data augmentation. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24(5), 1413–1426 (2019)
Arif, M., et al.: Clinically significant prostate cancer detection and segmentation in low-risk patients using a convolutional neural network on multi-parametric MRI. Eur. Radiol. 30(12), 6582–6592 (2020)
Shirabad, J.S., Menzies, T.J.: The PROMISE repository of software engineering databases. School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada (2005)
He, K., et al.: MetricUNet: synergistic image-and voxel-level learning for precise prostate segmentation via online sampling. Med. Image Anal. 71, 102039 (2021)
Litjens, G., Debats, O., Barentsz, J., Karssemeijer, N., Huisman, H.: Cancer imaging archive wiki (2017). https://doi.org/10.7937/K9TCIA
Giger, M., Drukker, K.: SPIE-AAPM-NCI PROSTATE MR Gleason grade group challenge PROSTATEx-2: performance evaluation. American Association of Physicist in Medicine (2017)
Duran-Lopez, L., Dominguez-Morales, J.P., Conde-Martin, A.F., Vicente-Diaz, S., Linares-Barranco, A.: PROMETEO: a CNN-based computer-aided diagnosis system for WSI prostate cancer detection. IEEE Access 8, 128613–128628 (2020)
Iqbal, S., et al.: Prostate cancer detection using deep learning and traditional techniques. IEEE Access 9, 27085–27100 (2021)
Annas, G.J.: HIPAA regulations-a new era of medical-record privacy? (2003)
Yepes Calderon, F., Rea, N., McComb, J.G.: Enabling the medical applications engine. In: Florez, H., Diaz, C., Chavarriaga, J. (eds.) ICAI 2018. CCIS, vol. 942, pp. 131–143. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01535-0_10
Calderon, F.Y., McComb, J.G.: Enabling the centralization of medical derived data for artificial intelligence implementations. Technical report Patent No. US20200273551A1, Children Hospital Los Angeles (2020)
Espinosa, C., Garcia, M., Yepes-Calderon, F., McComb, J.G., Florez, H.: Prostate cancer diagnosis automation using supervised artificial intelligence. A systematic literature review. In: Florez, H., Misra, S. (eds.) ICAI 2020. CCIS, vol. 1277, pp. 104–115. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61702-8_8
Yepes-Calderon, F., et al.: EdgeRunner: a novel shape-based pipeline for tumours analysis and characterisation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.: Imaging Vis. 6(1), 84–92 (2018)
Yepes-Calderón, F., Medina, F.M., Rea, N.D., Abella, J.: Tumor malignancy characterization in clinical environments: an approach using the FYC-index of spiculation and artificial intelligence. In: Tumor Progression and Metastasis. IntechOpen (2018)
Yepes-C, F., et al.: The 3D edgerunner pipeline: a novel shape-based analysis for neoplasms characterization. In: Medical Imaging 2016: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging, vol. 9788, pp. 681–685. SPIE (2016)
Matoso, A., Epstein, J.I.: Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings. Histopathology 74(1), 135–145 (2019)
Silva-Rodríguez, J., Colomer, A., Naranjo, V.: WeGleNet: a weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 88, 101846 (2021)
Chen, C.-M., Huang, Y.-S., Fang, P.-W., Liang, C.-W., Chang, R.-F.: A computer-aided diagnosis system for differentiation and delineation of malignant regions on whole-slide prostate histopathology image using spatial statistics and multidimensional densenet. Med. Phys. 47(3), 1021–1033 (2020)
Koziarski, M., et al.: DiagSet: a dataset for prostate cancer histopathological image classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04014 (2021)
Bhattacharjee, S., et al.: Cluster analysis of cell nuclei in H &E-stained histological sections of prostate cancer and classification based on traditional and modern artificial intelligence techniques. Diagnostics 12(1), 15 (2021)
Kalapahar, A., Silva-Rodríguez, J., Colomer, A., López-Mir, F., Naranjo, V.: Gleason grading of histology prostate images through semantic segmentation via residual U-net. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2501–2505. IEEE (2020)
Pinckaers, H., Bulten, W., van der Laak, J., Litjens, G.: Detection of prostate cancer in whole-slide images through end-to-end training with image-level labels. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40(7), 1817–1826 (2021)
Wang, J., Chen, R.J., Lu, M.Y., Baras, A., Mahmood, F.: Weakly supervised prostate TMA classification via graph convolutional networks. In: 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 239–243. IEEE (2020)
To, M.N.N., et al.: Deep learning framework for epithelium density estimation in prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. In: 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 438–441. IEEE (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Soto, S., Pollo-Cattaneo, M.F., Yepes-Calderon, F. (2024). Automated Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence. A Systematic Literature Review. In: Florez, H., Leon, M. (eds) Applied Informatics. ICAI 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1874. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46813-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46813-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46812-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46813-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)