Skip to main content

To Ban or Embrace: Students’ Perceptions Towards Adopting Advanced AI Chatbots in Schools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2023)

Abstract

The launch of ChatGPT has caused a storm of reactions and debates in the academic community. These ongoing conversations have elicited mixed responses of enthusiasm, dissatisfaction, and apprehension among stakeholders in the academic spaces. However, student voices are yet to be heard. This paper analyses student responses to an opinion piece about ChatGPT published in The New York Times. Using the Theory of Reasoned Action, we interpreted students’ perceptions and dispositions towards ChatGPT. We analyzed how students’ beliefs, personal experiences with ChatGPT, and social expectations influenced their stance on adopting or banning ChatGPT in U.S. schools. We found that students perceived ChatGPT to be a valuable tool to support learning. However, they have several concerns about the potential for cheating, misinformation, and issues of fairness related to the use of ChatGPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kocaballi, A.B.: Conversational AI-Powered Design: ChatGPT as Designer, User, and Product. (February 2023) (2023). . Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07406

  2. Tlili, A., et al.: What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn. Environ. 10(1), 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychol. Bull. 82(1975), 261–277 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dolores, A., Ajzen, I.: Predicting and Changing Behavior: A Reasoned Action Approach. Prediction and Change of Health Behavior: Applying the Reasoned Action Approach, pp. 3–21. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arastoopour Irgens, G., Eagan, B.: The foundations and fundamentals of quantitative ethnography. In: Damşa, C., Barany, A. (eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: 4th International Conference, ICQE 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark 15–19 Oct 2022, Proceedings, pp. 3–16. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Conner, M., Sparks, P.: Ambivalence and Attitudes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 12(1), 37–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fishbein, M.: A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In: Funke, U.H. (ed.) Mathematical Models in Marketing, pp. 87–88. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jalilian, F., Allahverdipour, H., Moeini, B., Moghimbeigi, A.: Effectiveness of anabolic steroid preventative intervention among gym users: applying theory of planned behavior. Health Promot Perspect 1(1), 32–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5681/hpp.2011.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Javadi, M., Kadkhodaee, M., Yaghoubi, M., Maroufi, M., Shams, A.: Applying theory of planned behavior in predicting of patient safety behaviors of nurses. Materia Socio Medica 25(1), 52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2013.25.52-55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. King, M.R.: A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 16(1), 1–2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Marlo, M.: ChatGPT and the Death of Education. Harvard Independent. https://harvardindependent.com/2023/02/chatgpt-and-the-death-of-education/ (2023). Retrieved 3 May 2023

  12. Marquart, C.L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Eagan, B., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic Network Analysis (Version 1.7. 0) [Software] (2018). https://app.epistemicnetwork.org/login.html

  13. Pang, Bo., Lee, Lillian: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. FNT Inform. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saldana, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, pp. 1–440. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018667 (2021). Retrieved 1 May 2023

  15. Evenstone, A.L.S., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4(3), 123–139 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, D.R.: A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am. J. Eval. 27(2), 237–246 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, K.: Programming techniques: regular expression search algorithm. Commun. ACM 11(6), 419–422 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1145/363347.363387

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yadav, R., Pathak, G.S.: Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol. Econ. 134, 114–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, M.: New York City schools ban AI chatbot that writes essays and answers prompts. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/06/new-york-city-schools-ban-ai-chatbot-chatgpt (2023). Retrieved 8 Apr 2023

  20. Students using ChatGPT to cheat, professor warns. Retrieved May 3, 2023 from https://nypost.com/2022/12/26/students-using-chatgpt-to-cheat-professor-warns/

  21. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison, WI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolulope Famaye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Famaye, T., Adisa, I.O., Irgens, G.A. (2023). To Ban or Embrace: Students’ Perceptions Towards Adopting Advanced AI Chatbots in Schools. In: Arastoopour Irgens, G., Knight, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47013-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47014-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics