Abstract
This paper extends a developing analytic framework for political discourse that takes place over digital social media. Earlier presentations of the framework have furnished a rationale for applying the conceptual framework of epistemic frame theory and the tools of quantitative ethnography for political discourse analysis. They have provided early existence proofs of the viability of epistemic network analysis (ENA) for rudimentary models of social media threads that involve political content. The current theoretical paper moves significantly beyond this foundation. It summarizes and deepens the explanation of the constructs of discursive transactions, response grammars, and epistemic frames in political discourse. It proposes and supports three modeling tools for building a productive science of political discourse. The first modeling tool involves both ENA and a mathematical means for extending ENA’s key explanatory and predictive potential to display dyadic connections between constructs. The second involves complex adaptive system (CAS) theory. The third involves the application of artificial neural networks. Each of these three tools provides valuable modeling affordances which the other two do not. Collectively, these three approaches hold promise to contribute to the science of political discourse by deepening our understanding and supporting potential repair of profoundly disturbing trends in political conversations that are unfolding globally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hamilton, E., Hobbs, W.: Epistemic frames and political discourse modeling. in advances in quantitative ethnography. ICQE 2021. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 1312. Springer, Cham (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_3
Hamilton, E., Hurford, A.: Political discourse modeling with epistemic network analysis and quantitative ethnography: rationale and examples. In: In Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: 4th International Conference, ICQE 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 359–373. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_25
Anderson, A.A., et al.: Toxic talk: how online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 30(1), 156–168 (2018)
Leifeld, P.: Discourse network analysis. The Oxford handbook of political networks, pp. 301–326 (2017)
Ingram, M., Ingram, H., Lejano, R.: Environmental action in the Anthropocene: the power of narrative-networks. J. Environ. Planning Policy Manage. 21(5), 492–503 (2019)
Takikawa, H., Sakamoto, T.: The moral–emotional foundations of political discourse: a comparative analysis of the speech records of the US and the Japanese legislatures. Qual. Quant. 54, 547–566 (2020)
Hamilton, E.: Unpublished Catalog of US Depolarization Initiatives By URL (2023). http://bit.ly/depolarization-initiatives-2023
Lesh, R., Lester, F., Hjalmarson, M.: A models and modeling perspective on metacognitive functioning in everyday situations where problem solvers develop mathematical constructs. In: Lesh, R., Doerr, H.M. (eds.) Beyond constructivism: models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching, pp. 383–403. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2003)
Phillips, M., et al.: Professional decision making: reframing teachers’ work using epistemic frame theory. In: Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Second International Conference, ICQE 2020, Malibu, CA, USA, 1–3 February 2021, Proceedings 2. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_18
Hamilton, E., Hobbs, W.: Epistemic frames and political discourse modeling. In: International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE21). in review
Singh, R.: Perils of screen addiction. AKGEC Int. J. Technol. 13, 40–44 (2022)
Zeng, Z.: The theories and effect of gratitude: a system review. J. Educ. Hum. Soc. Sci. 8, 1158–1163 (2023)
You, S., Lee, J., Lee, Y.: Relationships between gratitude, social support, and prosocial and problem behaviors. Current Psychology, pp. 1–8 (2020)
Bowman, D., et al.: The mathematical foundations of epistemic network analysis. In: Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Second International Conference, ICQE 2020, Malibu, CA, USA, 1–3 February 2021, Proceedings 2. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_7
Phelan, S.E.: What is complexity science, really? Emergence 3(1), 120–136 (2001)
Sabelli, N.H.: Complexity, technology, science, and education. J. Learn. Sci. 15(1), 5–9 (2006)
Hurford, A.: Complexity theories and theories of learning: Literature reviews and syntheses. In: Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers, pp. 567–589. Springer (2009)
Hamilton, E.: The Issue is not the Issue: a Complex Systems Approach to Political Discourse, in Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Los Angeles, CA (2023)
Abiodun, O.I., et al.: Comprehensive review of artificial neural network applications to pattern recognition. IEEE Access 7, 158820–158846 (2019)
Brodin, E.M., Avery, H.: Cross-disciplinary collaboration and scholarly independence in multidisciplinary learning environments at doctoral level and beyond. Minerva 58(3), 409–433 (2020)
Zembylas, M.: Emotion and Traumatic Conflict: Reclaiming Healing in Education. Oxford University Press (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hamilton, E., Williamson, M., Hurford, A. (2023). Theory-Building and Tool-Building for a Science of Dysfunctional Political Discourse. In: Arastoopour Irgens, G., Knight, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47013-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47014-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)