Skip to main content

Cultural Impact on a Global Virtual STEM Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2023)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1895))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

This paper examines discourse patterns of adolescents from five countries collaborating on STEM-related projects through online videoconferencing and the impact of culture on the program. Epistemic network analysis was used to analyze cross-cultural collaboration and interactions among learners from Brazil, Cameroon, Kenya, Namibia, and the United States while participating in the International Community for Collaborative Content Creation. Guided by the transfer and adoption of universal principles theory and intergroup contact theory, the research results show evidence of cultural sensitivity as it pertains to practices, heritage, and local STEM projects in June 2017, as well as values and language in August 2020, as learners engaged in STEM-related content creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beom, K.: The influence of internet and intercultural communication apprehension on socio-cultural adaptation. In: Paper presentation. The International Communication Association, San Diego, CA, United States (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neuliep, J.W.: The relationship among intercultural communication apprehension, ethnocentrism, uncertainty reduction, and communication satisfaction during initial intercultural interaction: an extension of anxiety and uncertainty management (AUM) theory. J. Intercult. Commun. Res. 41(1), 1–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2011.623239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedwell, W.L., Wildman, J.L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W.S., Salas, E.: Collaboration at work: an integrative multilevel conceptualization. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 22(2), 128–145 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Salazar, M., Salas, E.: Reflections of cross-cultural collaboration science. J. Organ. Behav. 34(6), 910–917 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett, J., Bennett, M.: Developing intercultural sensitivity: an integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In: Landis, D., Bennett, J.M., Bennett, M.J. (Eds.) Handbook of intercultural training, pp. 147–165. SAGE Publications (2004). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452[23]1129.n6

  6. Herrington, T.K.: Crossing global boundaries: beyond intercultural communication. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 24(4), 516–539 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910371303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry, L.B., Southwell, L.: Developing intercultural understanding and skills: models and approaches. Intercult. Educ. 22(6), 453–466 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2011.644948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luiz, J.: The impact of ethno-linguistic fractionalization on cultural measures: dynamics, endogeneity and modernization. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 46(9), 1080–1098 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. United States Census Bureau: The chance that two people chosen at random are of different race or ethnicity groups has increased since 2010. (2021)https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/2020-united-states-population-more-racially-ethnically-diverse-than-2010.html

  10. Akumbu, R.V.: Culturally relevant elements for K–12 education in Kisii. Order No. 29323485. Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amfo, N.A.A., Anderson, J.: Multilingualism and language policies in the African context: lessons from Ghana. Curr. Issues Lang. Plan. 20(4), 333–337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1582945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gatimu, M.W.: Rationale for critical pedagogy of decolonization: Kenya as a unit of analysis. J. Crit. Educ. Policy Stud. 7(2), 66–97. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ868821

  13. Charles, M.: Effective teaching and learning: decolonizing the curriculum. J. Black Stud. 50(8), 731–766 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934719885631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Etieyibo, E.: Why decolonization of the knowledge curriculum in Africa? Africa Today, 67(4), 74–87 (2021). https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/794678

  15. Hammond, Z.: Culturally Responsive Teaching & the Brain: Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students. Corwin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Biraimah, K.L.: Moving beyond a destructive past to a decolonised and inclusive future: the role of Ubuntu-style education in providing culturally relevant pedagogy for Namibia. Int. Rev. Educ. 62(1), 45–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9541-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Irvine, J.J.: Culturally relevant pedagogy. Educ. Digest 75(8), 57–61 (2010). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ880896

  18. Nashon, S.M.: Decolonizing science education in Africa: curriculum and pedagogy. In: Abdi, A.A., Misiaszek, G.W. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook on Critical Theories of Education, pp. 449–464. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86343-2_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Espino, D.P., Lee, S.B., van Tress, L., Baker, T.T., Hamilton, E.R.: Analysis of U.S., Kenyan, and Finnish discourse patterns in a cross-cultural digital makerspace learning community through the IBE-UNESCO global competences framework. Res. Soc. Sci. Technol. 5(1),86–100 (2020). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1265479.pdf

  20. Allport, G.W.: The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pettigrew, T.F.: Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49(1), 65–85 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernández, J.S., Sonn, C.C., Carolissen, R., Stevens, G.: Roots and routes toward decoloniality within and outside psychology praxis. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 25(4), 354–368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211002437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adler, N.J., Aycan, Z.: Cross-cultural interaction: what we know and what we need to know. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5(1), 307–333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Césaire, A.: Discourse on Colonialism. Pinkham, J. trans. Monthly Review Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maffly-Kipp, J., Mccredie, M.N., Morey, L.C.: The self-reference effect as a behavioral indicator of identity disturbances associated with borderline personality features in a non-clinical sample. Borderline Personal. Disord. Emot. Dysregulation 9(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-022-00189-7

  26. Foronda, C.L.: A concept analysis of cultural sensitivity. J. Transcult. Nurs. 19(3), 207–212 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659608317093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrenkohl, L.R., Cornelius, L.: Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. J. Learn. Sci. 22(3), 413–461 (2013). https://https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.799475

  28. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Siebert-Evenstone, A., Arastoopour Irgens, G., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Williamson Shaffer, D.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4(3), 123–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.43.7

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to acknowledge the generous support of the US National Science Foundation (#2109443) for support of the research that this paper presents. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth V. Akumbu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akumbu, R.V., Lux, K., Schulz, D., Espino, D., Hamilton, E. (2023). Cultural Impact on a Global Virtual STEM Project. In: Arastoopour Irgens, G., Knight, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47013-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47014-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics