Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Disinformation Regulations: A Preliminary Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14319))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The spread of Fake News poses a significant threat to democracy and public discourse. Instances of disinformation have had serious consequences, such as undermining election integrity and reducing vaccine trust over the recent years. Moreover, terminological variations and digital neologisms hinder consensus among scholars. The Internet proliferation has intensified the challenge of managing false content, demanding technological tools and regulations. This study explores the complexities of Fake News and the need for regulatory measures. A comparative law methodology is used to analyze international and European regulations concerning Fake News. Social media policies and reporting methods are also investigated, aiming to find ways to combat misinformation effectively. On the one hand, a fragmented regulatory framework both at a European and International level is revealed. To cope with this scenario, a multilingual ontology to harmonize definitions and facilitate compliance is proposed. On the other hand, the crucial role of Social Media policies, their algorithms’ transparency, and educating roles are considered. This leads to the need for an enhanced regulation of social media, educational initiatives of digital media literacy, and AI-driven news apps to provide trusted sources and manage misinformation in a better way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/policies/community-standards/misinformation/

  2. 2.

    https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/crisis-misinformation; https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/manipulated-media; https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/election-integrity-policy.

  3. 3.

    https://transparency.fb.com/en-gb/features/how-fact-checking-works/

  4. 4.

    https://www.openthebox.io/

  5. 5.

    https://www.getbadnews.com/books/english/

  6. 6.

    https://artifact.news/

  7. 7.

    https://transparency.fb.com/it-it/policies/community-standards/misinformation.

  8. 8.

    https://techcrunch.com/

References

  1. Viola, C., Toma, P., Manta, F., Benvenuto, M.: The more you know, the better you act? Institutional communication in Covid-19 crisis management. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 170, 120929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berghel, H.: Oh, what a tangled web: russian hacking, fake news, and the 2016 US presidential election. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 50, 87–91 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.3571054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrieri, V., Madio, L., Principe, F.: Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. Health Econ. (United Kingdom). 28, 1377–1382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belova, G., Georgieva, G.: Fake News as a Threat to National Security. In: International conference Knowledge-based Organization, vol. 24, pp. 19–22 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2018-0002

  5. Richter, A.: Fake news and freedom of the media. J. Int. Media Entertainmet Law 8, 1–34 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg, D.: Responding to “fake news”: is there an alternative to law and regulation? Southwest Law Review. 47, 417–447 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, F., Sheng, V.S., Wang, M.: A unified perspective for disinformation detection and truth discovery in social sensing: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 1–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3477138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durach, F., Baragaoanu, A., Nastasiu, C.: Tackling dsinformation: EU regulation of the digital space. Rom. J. Eur. Aff. 20 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Falduti, M., Griffo, C.: Modeling Cybercrime with UFO: an Ontological Analysis of Non-Consensual Pornography Cases. In: Ralyté, J., Chakravarthy, S., Mohania, M., Jeusfeld, M.A., Karlapalem, K. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2022. LNCS, vol. 13607, pp. 380–394. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_27

  10. Smal, L., Lösch, A., Van Genabith, J., Giagkou, M., Declerck, T., Busemann, S.: Language Data Sharing in European Public Services-Overcoming Obstacles and Creating Sustainable Data Sharing Infrastructures (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castano, S., Falduti, M., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: The LATO knowledge model for automated knowledge extraction and enrichment from court decisions corpora. Inf. Syst. 106, 101842 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castano, S., Falduti, M., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: The CRIKE data-science process for legal knowledge extraction discussion paper. In: Italian Symposium on Advanced Database Systems: 16th–19th June (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castano, S., Falduti, M., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: Law data science and ethics: the CRIKE approach. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Processing Information Ethically co-located with 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 1–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. EPRS-ComparativeLaw, europarleuropaeu: La libertà di espressione, una prospettiva di diritto comparato Unione europea. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Longo, L., Goebel, R., Lecue, F., Kieseberg, P., Holzinger, A.: Explainable artificial intelligence: concepts, applications, research challenges and visions. In: Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A.M., Weippl, E. (eds.) CD-MAKE 2020. LNCS, vol. 12279, pp. 1–16. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57321-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Amelio, A., Bonifazi, G., Janusz, A., Briguglio, L., Morpurgo, F., Occhipinti, C.: A multilayer network-based approach for interpreting and compressing convolutional neural networks. A governance and assessment model for ethical artificial intelligence in healthcare. Cognit. Comput. 15, 1–29 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eberle, E.J.: Issue 1 Symposium: Methodological Approaches to Comparative Law Article 2 Winter (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zecca, D.: Tutela dell’integrità dell’informazione e della comunicazione in rete: obblighi per le piattaforme digitali fra fonti comunitarie e disciplina degli Stati membri. DPCE Online. 37 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Birritteri Emanuele: Punire la disinformazione. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo - Rivista Trimestrale. 304–334 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vese, D.: Governing fake news: the regulation of social media and the right to freedom of expression in the era of emergency. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 13, 477–513 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kellner, D.: Cultural Studies, Multiculturalism, and Media Culture. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaudhary, S., Gkioulos, V., Katsikas, S.: Developing metrics to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity awareness program, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac006

  23. Bitton, R., Boymgold, K., Puzis, R., Shabtai, A.: Evaluating the information security awareness of smartphone users (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Calò .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Calò, A., Longo, A., Zappatore, M. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Disinformation Regulations: A Preliminary Analysis. In: Sales, T.P., Araújo, J., Borbinha, J., Guizzardi, G. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47112-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47112-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47111-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47112-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics