Skip to main content

Dense Re-Ranking with Weak Supervision for RDF Dataset Search

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2023 (ISWC 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14265))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dataset search aims to find datasets that are relevant to a keyword query. Existing dataset search engines rely on conventional sparse retrieval models (e.g., BM25). Dense models (e.g., BERT-based) remain under-investigated for two reasons: the limited availability of labeled data for fine-tuning such a deep neural model, and its limited input capacity relative to the large size of a dataset. To fill the gap, in this paper, we study dense re-ranking for RDF dataset search. Our re-ranking model encodes the metadata of RDF datasets and also their actual RDF data—by extracting a small yet representative subset of data to accommodate large datasets. To address the insufficiency of training data, we adopt a coarse-to-fine tuning strategy where we warm up the model with weak supervision from a large set of automatically generated queries and relevance labels. Experiments on the ACORDAR test collection demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, which considerably improves the retrieval accuracy of existing sparse models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/nju-websoft/ACORDAR.

  2. 2.

    https://ckan.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://getdkan.org/.

  4. 4.

    http://dataportals.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://data.wu.ac.at/portalwatch/.

  6. 6.

    https://dev.socrata.com/.

  7. 7.

    http://cas.lod-cloud.net/.

  8. 8.

    https://huggingface.co/t5-base.

  9. 9.

    https://github.com/facebookresearch/DPR.

  10. 10.

    https://github.com/stanford-futuredata/ColBERT.

  11. 11.

    https://github.com/facebookresearch/faiss.

References

  1. Anadiotis, A.G., et al.: Graph integration of structured, semistructured and unstructured data for data journalism. Inf. Syst. 104, 101846 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjelloun, O., Chen, S., Noy, N.F.: Google dataset search by the numbers. In: ISWC 2020, vol. 12507, pp. 667–682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_41

  3. Brickley, D., Burgess, M., Noy, N.F.: Google dataset search: building a search engine for datasets in an open Web ecosystem. In: WWW 2019, pp. 1365–1375 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313685

  4. Cebiric, S., Goasdoué, F., Kondylakis, H., Kotzinos, D., Manolescu, I., Troullinou, G., Zneika, M.: Summarizing semantic graphs: a survey. VLDB J. 28(3), 295–327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-018-0528-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman, A., Simperl, E., Koesten, L., Konstantinidis, G., Ibáñez, L., Kacprzak, E., Groth, P.: Dataset search: a survey. VLDB J. 29(1), 251–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-019-00564-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, J., Wang, X., Cheng, G., Kharlamov, E., Qu, Y.: Towards more usable dataset search: From query characterization to snippet generation. In: CIKM 2019, pp. 2445–2448 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3358096

  7. Chen, J., Chen, Q., Li, D., Huang, Y.: Sedr: segment representation learning for long documents dense retrieval. CoRR abs/2211.10841 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10841

  8. Cheng, G., Jin, C., Ding, W., Xu, D., Qu, Y.: Generating illustrative snippets for open data on the Web. In: WSDM 2017, pp. 151–159 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3018661.3018670

  9. Cheng, G., Jin, C., Qu, Y.: HIEDS: a generic and efficient approach to hierarchical dataset summarization. In: IJCAI 2016, pp. 3705–3711 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: NAACL-HLT 2019, vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423

  11. Izacard, G., et al.: Unsupervised dense information retrieval with contrastive learning. CoRR abs/2112.09118 (2021). 10.48550/arXiv.2112.09118

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karpukhin, V., et al.: Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. In: EMNLP 2020, pp. 6769–6781 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550

  13. Kato, M.P., Ohshima, H., Liu, Y., Chen, H.: A test collection for ad-hoc dataset retrieval. In: SIGIR 2021, pp. 2450–2456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3463261

  14. Khattab, O., Zaharia, M.: ColBERT: efficient and effective passage search via contextualized late interaction over BERT. In: SIGIR 2020, pp. 39–48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401075

  15. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: ICLR 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koesten, L.M., Kacprzak, E., Tennison, J.F.A., Simperl, E.: The trials and tribulations of working with structured data - a study on information seeking behaviour. In: CHI 2017, pp. 1277–1289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025838

  17. Lin, J., Nogueira, R.F., Yates, A.: Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2021). https://doi.org/10.2200/S01123ED1V01Y202108HLT053

  18. Lin, T., et al.: ACORDAR: a test collection for ad hoc content-based (RDF) dataset retrieval. In: SIGIR 2022, pp. 2981–2991 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3477495.3531729

  19. Liu, D., Cheng, G., Liu, Q., Qu, Y.: Fast and practical snippet generation for RDF datasets. ACM Trans. Web 13(4), 19:1–19:38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3365575

  20. Liu, Q., Cheng, G., Gunaratna, K., Qu, Y.: Entity summarization: state of the art and future challenges. J. Web Semant. 69, 100647 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo, H., Li, S., Gao, M., Yu, S., Glass, J.R.: Cooperative self-training of machine reading comprehension. In: NAACL 2022, pp. 244–257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.18

  22. Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: ACL 2009, pp. 1003–1011 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen, T., et al.: MS MARCO: a human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. In: CoCo 2016, vol. 1773 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pietriga, E., et al.: Browsing linked data catalogs with LODAtlas. In: ISWC 2018, pp. 137–153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_9

  25. Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., Liu, P.J.: Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21, 140:1-140:67 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H.: The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 3(4), 333–389 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, X., Cheng, G., Kharlamov, E.: Towards multi-facet snippets for dataset search. In: PROFILES & SEMEX 2019, pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, X., et al.: PCSG: pattern-coverage snippet generation for RDF datasets. In: ISWC 2021, pp. 3–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_1

  29. Wang, X., Cheng, G., Pan, J.Z., Kharlamov, E., Qu, Y.: BANDAR: benchmarking snippet generation algorithms for (RDF) dataset search. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 35(2), 1227–1241 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3095309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, X., Lin, T., Luo, W., Cheng, G., Qu, Y.: CKGSE: a prototype search engine for chinese knowledge graphs. Data Intell. 4(1), 41–65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong, L., et al.: Approximate nearest neighbor negative contrastive learning for dense text retrieval. In: ICLR 2021 (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=zeFrfgyZln

  32. Zhan, J., Mao, J., Liu, Y., Guo, J., Zhang, M., Ma, S.: Optimizing dense retrieval model training with hard negatives. In: SIGIR 2021, pp. 1503–1512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3462880

  33. Zhao, W.X., Liu, J., Ren, R., Wen, J.: Dense text retrieval based on pretrained language models: a survey. CoRR abs/2211.14876 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14876

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NSFC (62072224).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gong Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, Q. et al. (2023). Dense Re-Ranking with Weak Supervision for RDF Dataset Search. In: Payne, T.R., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2023. ISWC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47240-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47240-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47239-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47240-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics