Skip to main content

Benchmarking Geospatial Question Answering Engines Using the Dataset GeoQuestions1089

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2023 (ISWC 2023)

Abstract

We present the dataset GeoQuestions1089 for benchmarking geospatial question answering engines. GeoQuestions1089 is the largest such dataset available presently and it contains 1089 questions, their corresponding GeoSPARQL or SPARQL queries and their answers over the geospatial knowledge graph YAGO2geo. We use GeoQuestions1089 to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of geospatial question answering engines GeoQA2 (an extension of GeoQA developed by our group) and the system of Hamzei et al. (2021).

This work was supported by the first call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to support faculty members and researchers and the procurement of high-cost research equipment grant (HFRI-FM17-2351). It was also partially supported by the ESA project DA4DTE (subcontract 202320239), the Horizon 2020 project AI4Copernicus (GA No. 101016798) and the Marie Skłodowska-Curie project QuAre (GA No. 101032307).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/AI-team-UoA/GeoQuestions1089.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/AI-team-UoA/GeoQA2.

  3. 3.

    https://gadm.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.usgs.gov/.

  5. 5.

    https://www.grammarly.com/.

  6. 6.

    https://quillbot.com/.

  7. 7.

    For comparison purposes, for each question category, we comment whether the search engines Google and Bing can answer such questions after having tried a few examples.

  8. 8.

    The conceptual framework of Hamzei et al. [9] is much richer than the one of GeoQA2 and it includes concepts such as events, times etc. but it has not been tested with KGs or datasets involving these concepts.

  9. 9.

    https://github.com/hamzeiehsan/Questions-To-GeoSPARQL.

  10. 10.

    https://tomko.org/demo/.

  11. 11.

    https://github.com/GiorgosMandi/DS-JedAI.

References

  1. Beydokhti, M.K., Duckham, M., Tao, Y., Vasardani, M., Griffin, A.L.: Qualitative spatial reasoning over questions (short paper). In: Ishikawa, T., Fabrikant, S.I., Winter, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2022, 5–9 September 2022, Kobe. LIPIcs, vol. 240, pp. 18:1–18:7. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2022.18

  2. Burtsev, M., et al.: Deeppavlov: open-source library for dialogue systems. ACL (4), 122–127 (2018). https://aclanthology.info/papers/P18-4021/p18-4021

  3. Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Burstein, J., Doran, C., Solorio, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, 2–7 June 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1423

  4. Dsouza, A., Tempelmeier, N., Yu, R., Gottschalk, S., Demidova, E.: WorldKG: A world-scale geographic knowledge graph. In: CIKM ’21: The 30th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Virtual Event, Queensland, 1–5 November 2021, pp. 4475–4484. ACM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubey, M., Banerjee, D., Abdelkawi, A., Lehmann, J.: LC-QuAD 2.0: a large dataset for complex question answering over wikidata and DBpedia. In: ISWC (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferragina, P., Scaiella, U.: TAGME: on-the-fly annotation of short text fragments (by wikipedia entities). In: Huang, J.X., Koudas, N., Jones, G.J.F., Wu, X., Collins-Thompson, K., An, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2010), Toronto, 26–30 October 2010, pp. 1625–1628. ACM (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1871437.1871689

  7. Hamzei, E., Li, H., Vasardani, M., Baldwin, T., Winter, S., Tomko, M.: Place questions and human-generated answers: a data analysis approach. In: Kyriakidis, P., Hadjimitsis, D., Skarlatos, D., Mansourian, A. (eds.) AGILE 2019. LNGC, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14745-7_1

  8. Hamzei, E.: Place-related question answering: from questions to relevant answers. Ph.D. thesis (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamzei, E., Tomko, M., Winter, S.: Translating place-related questions to GeoSPARQL queries. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference (WWW) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffart, J., Suchanek, F.M., Berberich, K., Weikum, G.: Yago2: a spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from wikipedia. Artif. Intell. 194, 28–61 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ioannidis, T., Garbis, G., Kyzirakos, K., Bereta, K., Koubarakis, M.: Evaluating geospatial RDF stores using the benchmark geographica 2. J. Data Semant. 10(3–4), 189–228 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-021-00118-x

  12. Janowicz, K., et al.: Know, know where, knowwheregraph: a densely connected, cross-domain knowledge graph and geo-enrichment service stack for applications in environmental intelligence. AI Mag. 43(1), 30–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v43i1.19120

  13. Joshi, V., Peters, M.E., Hopkins, M.: Extending a parser to distant domains using a few dozen partially annotated examples. In: Gurevych, I., Miyao, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, 15–20 July 2018, Volume 1: Long Papers, pp. 1190–1199. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1110

  14. Karalis, N., Mandilaras, G., Koubarakis, M.: Extending the YAGO2 knowledge graph with precise geospatial knowledge. In: Ghidini, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2019. LNCS, vol. 11779, pp. 181–197. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_12

  15. Kyzirakos, K., Karpathiotakis, M., Koubarakis, M.: Strabon: A semantic geospatial DBMS. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 295–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_19

  16. Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., Dyer, C.: Neural architectures for named entity recognition. In: Knight, K., Nenkova, A., Rambow, O. (eds.) NAACL HLT 2016, The 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, San Diego, 12–17 June 2016, pp. 260–270. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n16-1030

  17. Li, H., et al.: Neural factoid geospatial question answering. J. Spatial Inf. Sci. 23, 65–90 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J., Rhind, D.W.: Geographic Information Science and Systems, 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lukovnikov, D., Fischer, A., Lehmann, J.: Pretrained transformers for simple question answering over knowledge graphs. In: Ghidini, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2019. LNCS, vol. 11778, pp. 470–486. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_27

  20. Koubarakis, M. (ed.): Geospatial Data Science: A Hands-on Approach Based on Geospatial Technologies. ACM Books (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-5010

  22. Papadakis, G., Mandilaras, G.M., Mamoulis, N., Koubarakis, M.: Progressive, holistic geospatial interlinking. In: Leskovec, J., Grobelnik, M., Najork, M., Tang, J., Zia, L. (eds.) The Web Conference 2021, Virtual Event (WWW 2021)/Ljubljana, 19–23 April 2021, pp. 833–844. ACM/IW3C2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3449850

  23. Papamichalopoulos, M., Papadakis, G., Mandilaras, G., Siampou, M.D., Mamoulis, N., Koubarakis, M.: Three-dimensional geospatial interlinking with jedai-spatial (2022). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.01905.pdf

  24. Punjani, D., et al.: Template-based question answering over linked geospatial data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07060 (2020)

  25. Punjani, D., et al.: Template-based question answering over linked geospatial data. In: Purves, R.S., Jones, C.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, GIR@SIGSPATIAL 2018, Seattle, 6 November 2018, pp. 7:1–7:10. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3281354.3281362

  26. Regalia, B.D.: Computational Time and Space Tradeoffs in Geo Knowledge Graphs. Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Barbara (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh, K., et al.: Why reinvent the wheel: let’s build question answering systems together. In: Champin, P., Gandon, F.L., Lalmas, M., Ipeirotis, P.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2018), Lyon, 23–27 April 2018, pp. 1247–1256. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186023

  28. Stoilos, G., Papasarantopoulos, N., Vougiouklis, P., Bansky, P.: Type linking for query understanding and semantic search. In: Zhang, A., Rangwala, H. (eds.) The 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2022), Washington, 14–18 August 2022, pp. 3931–3940. ACM (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539067

  29. Vrandecic, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2629489

  30. Wallgrün, J.O., Frommberger, L., Wolter, D., Dylla, F., Freksa, C.: Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning in the SparQ-toolbox. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4387, pp. 39–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_3

  31. Younis, E.M.G., Jones, C.B., Tanasescu, V., Abdelmoty, A.I.: Hybrid geo-spatial query methods on the semantic web with a spatially-enhanced index of DBpedia. In: Xiao, N., Kwan, M.-P., Goodchild, M.F., Shekhar, S. (eds.) GIScience 2012. LNCS, vol. 7478, pp. 340–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_25

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergios-Anestis Kefalidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kefalidis, SA. et al. (2023). Benchmarking Geospatial Question Answering Engines Using the Dataset GeoQuestions1089. In: Payne, T.R., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2023. ISWC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14266. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47242-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47243-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics