Skip to main content

Exploring the Needs and Preferences of Autistic Users in Extended Reality: A Participatory and Human-Centered Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN 2023)

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) has been widely applied as a promising technology for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, most studies in the literature have been conducted by researchers who are not disabled or autistic, resulting in products that are less user-centered. To address this issue, Project PHoENIX is initiated to gather information from stakeholders, including autistic people, caregivers, and parents, about their needs and preferences when using VR. Throughout the development cycle, a variety of user-centered learning experience design methods and process were employed. To assess the usability and user experience of Project PHoENIX, a formative evaluation with multiple usability sessions was conducted across two phases: Phase I Usability Testing and Phase II Pilot Testing. In this paper, we present the co-design process of Project PHoENIX with autistic stakeholders, followed by the results of a formative evaluation on the VR environments in Project PHoENIX. Multiple usability evaluation methods were utilized in both phases. The quantitative and qualitative findings suggest that utilizing co-design and user experience design methods, Project PHoENIX was designed using an innovative approach and is perceived as a highly usable, relevant, and satisfying VR technology, with the potential to scale to serve a broader community of individuals with autism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pantelidis, V.: Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 2(1–2), 59–70 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffs, T.: Virtual reality and special needs. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 2(1–2), 253–268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, D., Gausemeier, J., Fan, X., Grafe, M.: Virtual Reality & Augmented Reality in Industry. Springer, Berlin (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17376-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T., Fromm, J., Wohlgenannt, I.: A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Comput. Educ. 147, 103778 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raskind, M., Smedley, T., Higgins, K.: Virtual technology: bringing the world into the special education classroom. Interv. Sch. Clin. 41(2), 114–119 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeLuca, R., et al.: Innovative use of virtual reality in autism spectrum disorder: a case-study. Appl. Neuropsychol. Child 10(1), 90–100 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, Y., Huang, C.L., Yang, C.S.: Using a 3D immersive virtual environment system to enhance social understanding and social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabil. 30(4), 222–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615583473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenzo, G., Lledó, A., Pomares, J., Roig, R.: Design and application of an immersive virtual reality system to enhance emotional skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Comput. Educ. 98, 192–205 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, D.J., et al.: Can youth with autism spectrum disorder use virtual reality driving simulation training to evaluate and improve driving performance? An exploratory study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47(8), 2544–2555 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3164-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., et al.: Inclusive VR through inclusive co-design with neurodiverse learners. In: 7th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN), pp. 1–5 (2011). https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN52045.2021.9459322

  11. Economou, D., Russi, M., Doumanis, I., Mentzelopoulos, M., Bouki, V., Ferguson, J.: Using serious games for learning British sign language combining video, enhanced interactivity, and VR technology. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 26(8), 996–1016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.2020.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barahona-Corrêa, J., Velosa, A., Chainho, A., Lopes, R., Oliveira-Maia, A.: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 12, 27 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C., Pellicano, E.: Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism 20(4), 442–462 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lord, C., et al.: Autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Rev. Disease Primers 6(1), 1–23 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, M., Nasir, L., Farhat, M., Kook, B., Artukoglu, B., Bloch, M.: Meta-analysis: pharmacologic treatment of restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 60(1), 35–45 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soares, E., Bausback, K., Beard, C., Higinbotham, M., Bunge, E., Gengoux, G.: Social skills training for autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis of in-person and technological interventions. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 6(1), 166–180 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karami, B., Koushki, R., Arabgol, F., Rahmani, M., Vahabie, A.: Effectiveness of virtual/augmented reality-based therapeutic interventions on individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Front. Psychiatry 12, 887 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mesa-Gresa, P., Gil-Gómez, H., Lozano-Quilis, J., Gil-Gómez, J.: Effectiveness of virtual reality for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: an evidence-based systematic review. Sensors 18(8), 2486 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons, S.: Authenticity in Virtual Reality for assessment and intervention in autism: a conceptual review. Educ. Res. Rev. 19, 138–157 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt, M., Glaser, N.: Investigating the usability and learner experience of a virtual reality adaptive skills intervention for adults with autism spectrum disorder. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 69(3), 1665–1699 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris, L., Gilmore, D., Longo, A., Hand, B.: Patterns of US federal autism research funding during 2017–2019. Autism 25(7), 2135–2139 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Josman, N., Ben-Chaim, H., Friedrich, S., Weiss, P.: Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with autism. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 7(1), 49–56 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kandalaft, M., Didehbani, N., Krawczyk, D., Allen, T., Chapman, S.: Virtual reality social cognition training for young adults with high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43(1), 34–44 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parsons, S., Cobb, S.: State-of-the-art of virtual reality technologies for children on the autism spectrum. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 26(3), 355–366 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Honebein, P.C., Honebein, C.H.: Effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal: pick any two? The influence of learning domains and learning outcomes on designer judgments of useful instructional methods. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 63(6), 937–955 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9396-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu, J., Schmidt, M., Lee, M., Huang, R.: Usability research in educational technology: a state-of-the-art systematic review. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 70(6), 1951–1992 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10152-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenzweig, E.: Successful User Experience: Strategies and Roadmaps. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, Maryland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nelsestuen, K., Smith, J.: Empathy interviews. Learn. Prof. 41(5), 59 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gray, C., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C., Gonzalez, R.: Idea generation through empathy: reimagining the cognitive walkthrough. In: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 26.871.1–26.871.29 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Strobel, J., Hess, J., Pan, R., Wachter Morris, C.: Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers. Eng. Stud. 5(2), 137–159 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sauro, J., Lewis, J.: Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge, Maryland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Foster, S., Mash, E.: Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research: issues and procedures. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67(3), 308 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Park, E., Blair, K.: Social validity assessment in behavior interventions for young children: a systematic review. Top. Early Child. Spec. Educ. 39(3), 156–169 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis, J.: Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 14(3–4), 463–488 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2002.9669130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kushniruk, A., Borycki, E., Kitson, N., Kannry, J.: Development of a video coding scheme focused on socio-technical aspects of human-computer interaction in healthcare. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 257, 236–243 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Common, E., Lane, K.: Social validity assessment. In: Applied Behavior Analysis Advanced Guidebook, pp. 73–92. Academic Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen Norman Group Articles Page. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/. Accessed 01 Feb 2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lu, J., Schmidt, M. (2024). Exploring the Needs and Preferences of Autistic Users in Extended Reality: A Participatory and Human-Centered Approach. In: Bourguet, ML., Krüger, J.M., Pedrosa, D., Dengel, A., Peña-Rios, A., Richter, J. (eds) Immersive Learning Research Network. iLRN 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1904. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47327-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47328-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics