Skip to main content

Introducing a New Technology Quality Indicator for Intervention Design in Special Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN 2023)

Abstract

There’s significant value in following a systematic methodology in educational research, not only to gain valid and reliable empirical data, but also to determine which interventions meet quality indicators and consistently generate expected results. Looking at Special Education, and in line with the necessity for methodological rigor, specific quality indicators to ensure evidence in educational empirical study designs have been developed. In this sense, digital technologies, and recently, immersive technologies are increasingly being used in educational interventions due to the positive learning outcomes seen in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Nevertheless, the affordances of the technology used in such interventions are hardly considered indicating a research gap worth investigating further. Single subject design seems to support effective instructional interventions because of the unique characteristics of every student with a specific disability. This work introduces Augmented Reality, among other quality indicators, to measure the extent of which the structure of matter is understood by students with Intellectual Disabilities. The empirical study set forth in this paper satisfactorily met all existing quality indicators, in addition to the newly introduced AR technology indicator. Findings showed that the research design of the enriched set of quality indicators increased student motivation and their understanding of abstract Physics concepts. The students with ID acquired targeted physics concepts, as well as inquiry skills thanks to their involvement in a vivid experience. These results point to the contribution of AR technology through its affordances as a new quality indicator among the existing set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seidel, T., Shavelson, R.J.: Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(4), 454–499 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., Wolery, M.: The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Except. Child. 71(2), 165–179 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kratochwill, T.R., Levin, J.R.: Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue. Psychol. Methods 15(2), 124–144 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, B.G., Cook, L.: Research designs and special education research: different designs address different questions. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 31(4), 190–198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, B.G., Love, H.R., Cook, L.: Mixed-methods approaches in special education research. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 37(4), 314–323 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Council for Exceptional Children. TEACHING Exceptional Children 46(6), 206–212 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., Richardson, V.: Qualitative studies in special education. Except. Child. 71(2), 195–207 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., Innocenti, M.S.: Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Except. Child. 71(2), 149–164 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R.H., Thompson, B., Harris, K.R.: Research in special education: scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Except. Child. 71(2), 137–148 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kratochwill, T.R., et al.: Single-case intervention research design standards. Remed. Spec. Educ. 34(1), 26–38 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Talbott, E., Maggin, D.M., Van Acker, E.Y., Kumm, S.: Quality indicators for reviews of research in special education. Exceptionality 26(4), 245–265 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Knight, V.F., Wood, L., McKissick, B.R., Kuntz, E.M.: Teaching science content and practices to students with intellectual disability and autism. Remed. Spec. Educa. 41(6), 327–340 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baragash, R.S., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A.I., Alfarraj, O.: Augmented reality in special education: a meta-analysis of single-subject design studies. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 35(3), 382–397 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández-Batanero, J.M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J.: Use of augmented reality for students with educational needs: a systematic review (2016–2021). Societies 12(2), 36 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang, Y.S., Chang, Y.J.: Using an augmented reality game to teach three junior high school students with intellectual disabilities to improve ATM use. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 33(3), 409–419 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Montoya-Rodríguez, M.M., et al.: Virtual reality and augmented reality as strategies for teaching social skills to individuals with intellectual disability: a systematic review. J. Intellect. Disabil. (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yenioglu, B.Y., Ergulec, F., Yenioglu, S.: Augmented reality for learning in special education: a systematic literature review. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–17 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mallidis-Malessas, P., Iatraki, G., Mikropoulos, T.A.: Teaching physics to students with intellectual disabilities using digital learning objects. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 37(4), 510–522 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McMahon, D.D., Cihak, D.F., Wright, R.E., Bell, S.M.: Augmented reality for teaching science vocabulary to postsecondary education students with intellectual disabilities and autism. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 48(1), 38–56 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gersten, R., Edyburn, D.: Defining quality indicators for special education technology research. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 22(3), 3–18 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carreon, A., Smith, S.J., Mosher, M., Rao, K., Rowland, A.: A review of virtual reality intervention research for students with disabilities in K–12 settings. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 37(1), 82–99 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Köse, H., Güner-Yildiz, N.: Augmented reality (AR) as a learning material in special needs education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26, 1921–1936 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mikropoulos, T.A., Iatraki, G.: Digital technology supports science education for students with disabilities: a systematic review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 3911–3935 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Delimitros, M., Stergiouli, A., Iatraki, G., Koutromanos, G., Mikropoulos, T.A.: A model for the design of immersive learning enactments for students with intellectual disabilities. In: Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion. ACM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McDermott, L.C., Shaffer, P.S., Constantinou, C.P.: Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry. Phys. Educ. 35(6), 411–416 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pedaste, M., et al.: Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 47–61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horner, R.H., Swaminathan, H., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K.: Considerations for the systematic analysis and use of single-case research. Educ. Treat. Child. 35(2), 269–290 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kay, R., Knaack, L.: Developing learning objects for secondary school students: a multi-component model. Interdisc. J. e-Skills Lifelong Learn. 1, 229–254 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Casto, G.: The Quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: methodology and validation. Rase 8(2), 24–33 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A.: How to summarize single-participant research: ideas and applications. Exceptionality 9, 227–244 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng, S.-C., Lai, C.-L.: Facilitating learning for students with special needs: a review of technology-supported special education studies. J. Comput. Educ. 7(2), 131–153 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the students for their participation in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia Iatraki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Iatraki, G., Mikropoulos, T.A. (2024). Introducing a New Technology Quality Indicator for Intervention Design in Special Education. In: Bourguet, ML., Krüger, J.M., Pedrosa, D., Dengel, A., Peña-Rios, A., Richter, J. (eds) Immersive Learning Research Network. iLRN 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1904. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47327-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47328-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics