Abstract
This study investigates the efficacy of incorporating ChatGPT (Radford et al., 2021), a cutting-edge natural language processing (NLP) tool, into higher education, specifically for an introductory statistics course. Drawing from the pedagogical framework of constructivist learning theory (Piaget, 1954; Vygotsky, 1978), the author, a statistics professor, explores the potential benefits and drawbacks of utilizing ChatGPT in the learning process. The study consists of four stages: (1) employing ChatGPT to perform preliminary data analyses and determine the appropriate statistical tests, (2) executing both parametric and nonparametric tests with ChatGPT’s assistance, (3) reviewing the output and analysis for accuracy, and (4) evaluating the potential impact on students’ understanding of statistical concepts and procedures. The findings suggest that ChatGPT offers valuable support in data analysis and interpretation, by providing students with models to compare their results and understanding against the AI-generated output in a similar manner as described by Bishop, 2006. However, potential drawbacks include the risk of students becoming overly reliant on ChatGPT, leading to diminished understanding of statistical concepts (Kirschner et al., 2006), or possessing insufficient knowledge to identify errors introduced by the AI (Hattie & Donoghue, 2016). The study concludes that, while ChatGPT can enhance the learning experience in statistics education, careful implementation and guidance are necessary to prevent potential hindrances to students’ development of a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter due to incorrect results and incorrect interpretations and citations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, Springer, New York (2006)
Hattie, J., Donoghue, G.M.: Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model. Sci. Learn. 1(1), 1–13 (2016)
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E.: Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ. Psychol. 41(2), 75–86 (2006)
Piaget, J.: The Construction of Reality in the Child. Basic Books (1954)
Li, X.: ChatGPT: an end or a new beginning for mathematics education? Cambridge Mathematics. https://www.cambridgemaths.org/blogs/ChatGPT-end-or-new-beginning-for-mathematics-education/. Accessed 30 Apr 2023
OpenAI: ChatGPT. GitHub. https://github.com/openai/chat-gpt-3. Accessed 2021
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press (1978)
Wolfram, S.: What is ChatGPT doing, and why does it work? Stephen Wolfram Blog. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-ChatGPT-doing-and-why-does-it-work/. Accessed 30 Apr 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pannu, J., Boosalis, C. (2023). A Use-Case for Implementing ChatGPT to Augment Teaching an Introductory Statistics Course. In: Arai, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2023, Volume 1. FTC 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 813. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47454-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47454-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47453-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47454-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)