Skip to main content

From Playing the Story to Gaming the System: Repeat Experiences of a Large Language Model-Based Interactive Story

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Storytelling (ICIDS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14383))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 717 Accesses

Abstract

A distinctive aspect of interactive stories is how they enable players to impact the story based on their choices, with repeated playthroughs potentially yielding different stories. While some work has been done to investigate repeat experiences of interactive stories, the focus has mainly been on simpler linear and branching narrative systems. Recent advances in large language model (LLM) systems such as ChatGPT have sparked renewed interest in how users engage with artificial intelligence systems, and how LLM systems could be used in works of entertainment such as games and interactive stories. In this paper, we detail the findings of a qualitative observational study of 10 participants playing and replaying the interactive text adventure game AI Dungeon which is based upon the natural-language-generating LLMs GPT-3 and GPT-J. The study provides insights into how the player’s mental model of the system shifts from assuming the system is a linear or branching narrative to one with seemingly limitless narrative possibilities. This study also uncovers three related sources of motivations for repeat engagement with an LLM-based interactive story, which are impacted by the player’s shifting mental model of the system: narrative closure, narrative incoherence, and expectations for variation between playthroughs. Finally, this study highlights how uncertainty in terms of both how the system works and what objectives the player has could impact the player’s choice of actions when engaging with an LLM-based interactive story such as AI Dungeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    STEM majors’ classification is based on [44].

References

  1. Călinescu, M.: Rereading. Yale University Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galef, D.: Second Thoughts: a Focus on Rereading. Wayne State University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brewer, W.: The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In: Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations. Routledge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, B., Ang, B.H., Mitchell, A.: I need to play three times before I kind of understand: Exploring player motivations for replaying interactive stories. In: Proceedings of CHI Play 2021 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell, A., Kway, L., Lee, B.J.: Storygameness: understanding repeat experience and the desire for closure in storygames. In: Digital Games Research Association DiGRA 2020, Finland (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, A., McGee, K.: Reading again for the first time: A model of rereading in interactive stories. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34851-8_20

  7. Mitchell, A.: Reflective rereading and the simcity effect in interactive stories. In: Schoenau-Fog, H., Bruni, L.E., Louchart, S., Baceviciute, S. (eds.) ICIDS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9445, pp. 27–39. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27036-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Wardrip-Furin, N., Mateas, M.: The future is in interactive storytelling, 4 May 2017. https://theconversation.com/the-future-is-in-interactive-storytelling-76772

  9. Latitude, “AI Dungeon” [interactive fiction], Latitude (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mueller, F.: “The Infinite Story” [interactive fiction], Florian Mueller (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things, Doubleday Currency (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen, J.: Mental Models, 17 October 2010. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/mental-models/

  13. Haig, K.M., Sutton, S., Whittington, J.: SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 32(3), 167–175 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rapp, D.N.: Mental models: theoretical issues for visualizations in science education. Vis. Sci. Educ. 1, 43–60 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, I., Barker, M., Jones, A.: Promoting mental model building in astronomy education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25(10), 1205–1225 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham, J., Zheng, L., Gonzalez, C.: A cognitive approach to game usability and design: mental model development in novice real-time strategy gamers. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9(3), 361–366 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Slade, D., Brooker, C.: Black Mirror: Bandersnatch [interactive film], Netflix (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weather Factory, “Cultist Simulator” [PC computer game], Humble Bundle (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gunning, D.: “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI),” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

    Google Scholar 

  20. Villareale, J., Harteveld, C., Zhu, J.: I want to see how smart this AI really is: player mental model development of an adversarial AI player. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, J., Risi, S.: “iNNk” [computer game], IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kumari, S., Deterding, S., Freeman, J.: The role of uncertainty in moment-to-moment player motivation: a grounded theory. In: Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, Barcelona (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vaassen, B.: AI, Opacity, and Personal autonomy. Philos. Technol. 35(88) 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00577-5

  24. Bourton, S., Wigley, C., Williams, S.: Embrace the uncertainty of AI, 23 July 2018. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-organization-blog/embrace-the-uncertainty-of-ai

  25. Sicart, M.: Loops and metagames: understanding game design structures. In: 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, California (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suomala, J., Kauttonen, J.: Human’s intuitive mental models as a source of realistic artificial intelligence and engineering. Front. Pyschology 13, 873289 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lox Rain, “The Shadows That Run Alongside Our Car” [computer game], Lox Rain (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carroll, N.: Narrative closure. Int. J. Philos. Anal. Tradition 135(1), 1–15 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9097-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace, The MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marr, B.: What Is GPT-3 And Why Is It Revolutionizing Artificial Intelligence?, 5 October 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2020/10/05/what-is-gpt-3-and-why-is-it-revolutionizing-artificial-intelligence/?sh=280bf241481a

  31. Sagar, R.: OpenAI Releases GPT-3, The Largest Model So Far, 3 June 2020. https://analyticsindiamag.com/open-ai-gpt-3-language-model/

  32. Forefront, “GPT-J-6B: An Introduction to the Largest Open Source GPT Model | Forefront,” 15 October 2021. https://forefrontai.medium.com/gpt-j-6b-an-introduction-to-the-largest-open-source-gpt-model-forefront-6962eccdfee1

  33. Bowers, V.A., Snyder, H.L.: Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocol for comparing window usability. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuusela, H., Paul, P.: A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am. J. Psychol. 113(3), 387–404 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Knickmeyer, R.L., Mateas, M.: Preliminary evaluation of the interactive drama façade. In: CHI EA 05, Portland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell, A., Sim, Y.T., Kway, L.: Making it unfamiliar in the “Right” way: an empirical study of poetic gameplay. In: Digital Games Research Association, Melbourne (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Herman, D.: Narrative Ways of Worldmaking,” in Narratology in the Age of Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Research, pp. 71–87. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Garfield, R.: Metagames. In: Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Essays on Roleplying, Charleston, IL, Jolly Roger Games, pp. 14–21 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Boluk, S., LeMieux, P.: Metagaming: Playing, competing, spectating, cheating, trading, making, and breaking videogames. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Ryan, J.: Curating Simulated Storyworlds, Ph.D Thesis, UC Santa Cruz (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kreminski, M.: Narrative Instruments: AI-Based Playable Media for Storytelling, Ph.D Thesis, UC Santa Cruz (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Koenitz, H.: Understanding Interactive Digital Narrative: Immersive expressions for a complex time. Routledge, New York (2023)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, K.: What Are STEM Degrees?, 29 November 2019. https://www.gcu.edu/blog/engineering-technology/what-are-stem-degrees

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded under the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 grant FY2018-FRC2–003, “Understanding Repeat Engagement with Dynamically Changing Computational Media”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Mitchell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yong, Q.R., Mitchell, A. (2023). From Playing the Story to Gaming the System: Repeat Experiences of a Large Language Model-Based Interactive Story. In: Holloway-Attaway, L., Murray, J.T. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14383. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47654-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47655-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics