Skip to main content

On Reproducible Implementations in Unsupervised Concept Drift Detection Algorithms Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence XL (SGAI 2023)

Abstract

In order to create reproducible experimentation and algorithms in machine learning and data mining research, reproducible descriptions of the algorithms are needed. These can be in the form of source code, pseudo code and prose. Efforts in academia commonly focus on accessibility of source code. Based on an internal study reproducing unsupervised concept drift detectors, this work argues that a publication’s content is equally important and highlights common issues affecting attempts at implementing unsupervised concept drift detectors. These include major issues prohibiting implementation entirely, as well as minor issues, which demand increased effort from the developer. The paper proposes the use of a checklist as a consistent tool to ensure better quality and reproducible publications of algorithms. The issues highlighted in this work could mark a starting point, although future work is required to ensure representation of more diverse areas of research in artificial intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bellamy, R.K.: What does pseudo-code do? A psychological analysis of the use of pseudo-code by experienced programmers. Hum. Comput. Interact. 9(2), 225–246 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gawande, A.: The Checklist Manifesto. Metropolitan Books, New Delhi (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heil, B.J., Hoffman, M.M., Markowetz, F., Lee, S.I., Greene, C.S., Hicks, S.C.: Reproducibility standards for machine learning in the life sciences. Nat. Meth. 18(10), 1132–1135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01256-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knuth, D.E.: Literate programming. Comput. J. 27(2), 97–111 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/27.2.97

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Licensing a Repository. https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/licensing-a-repository. Accessed 26 June 2023

  6. No License | Choose a License. https://choosealicense.com/no-permission. Accessed 26 June 2023

  7. Olorisade, B.K., Brereton, P., Andras, P.: Reproducibility of studies on text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews: evaluation and checklist. J. Biomed. Inform. 73, 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papers with Code. https://paperswithcode.com. Accessed 26 June 2023

  9. Pineau, J., et al.: Improving reproducibility in machine learning research (a report from the NeurIPS 2019 reproducibility program). J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22, 7459–7478 (2021)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pérez, Fernando, K.J.M.: Developing open-source scientific practice. In: Implementing Reproducible Research. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reproducibility Checklist | AAAI 2023 Conference. https://aaai-23.aaai.org/reproducibility-checklist. Accessed 26 June 2023

  12. Reproducibility in Machine Learning. https://sites.google.com/view/icml-reproducibility-workshop/home. Accessed 26 June 2023

  13. Shireman, E., Steinley, D., Brusco, M.J.: Examining the effect of initialization strategies on the performance of Gaussian mixture modeling. Behav. Res. Meth. 49(1), 282–293 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0697-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tips for Publishing Research Code. https://github.com/paperswithcode/releasing-research-code. Accessed 26 June 2023

  15. Wolter, K.M.: Introduction to Variance Estimation. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences, Springer, New York, NY (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35099-8

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has received partial funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101000825 (NAUTILOS).This work also received partial funding from Niedersächsisches Vorab under grant number ZN3683 (ChESS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Lukats .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lukats, D., Stahl, F. (2023). On Reproducible Implementations in Unsupervised Concept Drift Detection Algorithms Research. In: Bramer, M., Stahl, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence XL. SGAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14381. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47994-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47994-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47993-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47994-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics