Skip to main content

Developing an Online Learning Tool to Improve Financial Literacy in Older Adults: An Intergenerational Co-design Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2023)

Abstract

With aging, individuals are responsible for managing and spending their retirement assets, along with making complicated decisions on medical care, aged care, and estate planning, all while facing a decline in their cognitive performance and financial literacy. Older people are the most vulnerable groups in financial literacy and financial management. Providing older people with financial inclusion and financial literacy programs is essential. This article described an intergenerational, co-design process of developing an online interactive learning tool that could enhance financial literacy for older people and their families. Seven older adults and four law students were recruited and trained as co-designers. They interviewed 60 older individuals in Hong Kong to identify misconceptions, knowledge gaps, and suboptimal financial decisions made by them. These qualitative data were analyzed and utilized to create an online learning tool to address the greatest common misconceptions. The online learning tool consists of a self-assessment quiz and instructive animations, which are shared on a website that was open to the public. We discussed the benefits and difficulties of involving co-designers of different ages in the research and design process. This study contributes to a better understanding of how to carry out intergenerational co-design activities in the context of social and healthcare research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, X., et al.: The path to healthy ageing in China: a Peking university-lancet commission. Lancet 400, 1967–2006 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gamble, K.J., Boyle, P.A., Yu, L., Bennett, D.A.: Aging and financial decision making. Manage. Sci. 61, 2603–2610 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O.S.: Financial fraud among older Americans: evidence and implications. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 75, 861–868 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiso, H., Hershey, D.A.: Working adults’ metacognitions regarding financial planning for retirement. Work Aging Retirement 3(1), 77–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fong, J.H., Koh, B.S.K., Mitchell, O.S., Rohwedder, S.: Financial literacy and financial decision-making at older ages. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 65, 101481 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao, T.: Financial preparation and needs of older people. Asia Pac. Inst. Ageing Stud. Newsl. 6, 18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, S.Y., Chou, K.L., Chan, W.S., van Kippersluis, H.: Consumer preferences and demand for annuities: evidence from Hong Kong. J. Aging Soc. Policy 31, 170–188 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chou, K.L., Chow, N.W.S., Chi, I.: Willingness to consider applying for reverse mortgage in Hong Kong Chinese middle-aged homeowners. Habitat Int. 30, 716–727 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He, A.J., Qian, J., Chan, W.-S., Chou, K.-L.: Willingness to purchase hypothetical private long-term care insurance plans in a super-ageing society: evidence from Hong Kong. J. Aging Soc. Policy 35, 1–26 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ries, N.M., Johnston, B., McCarthy, S.: Legal education and the ageing population: building student knowledge and skills through experiential learning in collaboration with community organisations. Adel. L. Rev. 37, 495–522 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samsi, K., Manthorpe, J.: I live for today: a qualitative study investigating older people’s attitudes to advance planning. Health Soc. Care Community 19, 52–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wood, S., Lichtenberg, P.A.: Financial capacity and financial exploitation of older adults: research findings, policy recommendations and clinical implications. Clin. Gerontol. 40, 3–13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tilse, C., Setterlund, D., Wilson, J., Rosenman, L.: Minding the money: a growing responsibility for informal carers. Ageing Soc. 25, 215–227 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldwin, J.N., Napier, S., Neville, S., Wright-St Clair, V.A.: Impacts of older people’s patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a systematic review. Age Ageing 47, 801–809 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corrado, A.M., Benjamin-Thomas, T.E., McGrath, C., Hand, C., Laliberte Rudman, D.: Participatory action research with older adults: a critical interpretive synthesis. Gerontologist 60, e413–e427 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lushey, C.J., Munro, E.R.: Participatory peer research methodology: an effective method for obtaining young people’s perspectives on transitions from care to adulthood? Qual. Soc. Work. 14, 522–537 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Littlechild, R., Tanner, D., Hall, K.: Co-research with older people: perspectives on impact. Qual. Soc. Work. 14, 18–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Buffel, T.: Older coresearchers exploring age-friendly communities: an insider perspective on the benefits and challenges of peer-research. Gerontologist 59, 538–548 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrow-Howell, N., Lawlor, E.F., Macias, E.S., Swinford, E., Brandt, J.: Making the case for age-diverse universities. Gerontologist 60, 1187–1193 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pettigrew, T.F., Tropp, L.R., Wagner, U., Christ, O.: Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int. J. Intercult. Rel. 35, 271–280 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vrkljan, B., et al.: Creating an intergenerational university hub: engaging older and younger users in the shaping of space and place. Gerontol. Geriatr. Educ. 40, 244–260 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grigorovich, A., Kontos, P., Jenkins, A., Kirkland, S.: Moving toward the promise of participatory engagement of older adults in gerotechnology. Gerontologist 62, 324–331 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Righi, V., Sayago, S., Blat, J.: When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a turn to community in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 108, 15–31 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickinson, C., Bamford, C., Exley, C., Emmett, C., Hughes, J., Robinson, L.: Planning for tomorrow whilst living for today: the views of people with dementia and their families on advance care planning. Int. Psychogeriatr. 25, 2011–2021 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hershey, D.A., Jacobs-Lawson, J.M., McArdle, J.J., Hamagami, F.: Psychological foundations of financial planning for retirement. J. Adult Dev. 14, 26–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9028-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ries, N.M.: Enduring powers of attorney and financial exploitation of older people: a conceptual analysis and strategies for prevention. J. Aging Soc. Policy 34, 357–374 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mey, E., van Hoven, B.: Managing expectations in participatory research involving older people: what’s in it for whom? Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 22, 323–334 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kong, T.S.K.: Gay and grey: participatory action research in Hong Kong. Qual. Res. 18, 257–272 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bombard, Y., et al.: Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement. Sci. 13, 98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organization: Global report on ageism. World Health Organization, Geneva (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Doyle, M., Timonen, V.: Lessons from a community-based participatory research project: older people’s and researchers’ reflections. Res. Aging 32, 244–263 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (22YJC840004) and the Investor and Financial Education Council (RS190211).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, K., Lou, V. (2023). Developing an Online Learning Tool to Improve Financial Literacy in Older Adults: An Intergenerational Co-design Case Study. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Duffy, V.G., Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14055. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48041-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48041-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48040-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48041-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics