Abstract
With aging, individuals are responsible for managing and spending their retirement assets, along with making complicated decisions on medical care, aged care, and estate planning, all while facing a decline in their cognitive performance and financial literacy. Older people are the most vulnerable groups in financial literacy and financial management. Providing older people with financial inclusion and financial literacy programs is essential. This article described an intergenerational, co-design process of developing an online interactive learning tool that could enhance financial literacy for older people and their families. Seven older adults and four law students were recruited and trained as co-designers. They interviewed 60 older individuals in Hong Kong to identify misconceptions, knowledge gaps, and suboptimal financial decisions made by them. These qualitative data were analyzed and utilized to create an online learning tool to address the greatest common misconceptions. The online learning tool consists of a self-assessment quiz and instructive animations, which are shared on a website that was open to the public. We discussed the benefits and difficulties of involving co-designers of different ages in the research and design process. This study contributes to a better understanding of how to carry out intergenerational co-design activities in the context of social and healthcare research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, X., et al.: The path to healthy ageing in China: a Peking university-lancet commission. Lancet 400, 1967–2006 (2022)
Gamble, K.J., Boyle, P.A., Yu, L., Bennett, D.A.: Aging and financial decision making. Manage. Sci. 61, 2603–2610 (2015)
DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O.S.: Financial fraud among older Americans: evidence and implications. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 75, 861–868 (2020)
Kiso, H., Hershey, D.A.: Working adults’ metacognitions regarding financial planning for retirement. Work Aging Retirement 3(1), 77–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw021
Fong, J.H., Koh, B.S.K., Mitchell, O.S., Rohwedder, S.: Financial literacy and financial decision-making at older ages. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 65, 101481 (2021)
Cao, T.: Financial preparation and needs of older people. Asia Pac. Inst. Ageing Stud. Newsl. 6, 18 (2015)
Lee, S.Y., Chou, K.L., Chan, W.S., van Kippersluis, H.: Consumer preferences and demand for annuities: evidence from Hong Kong. J. Aging Soc. Policy 31, 170–188 (2019)
Chou, K.L., Chow, N.W.S., Chi, I.: Willingness to consider applying for reverse mortgage in Hong Kong Chinese middle-aged homeowners. Habitat Int. 30, 716–727 (2006)
He, A.J., Qian, J., Chan, W.-S., Chou, K.-L.: Willingness to purchase hypothetical private long-term care insurance plans in a super-ageing society: evidence from Hong Kong. J. Aging Soc. Policy 35, 1–26 (2023)
Ries, N.M., Johnston, B., McCarthy, S.: Legal education and the ageing population: building student knowledge and skills through experiential learning in collaboration with community organisations. Adel. L. Rev. 37, 495–522 (2016)
Samsi, K., Manthorpe, J.: I live for today: a qualitative study investigating older people’s attitudes to advance planning. Health Soc. Care Community 19, 52–59 (2011)
Wood, S., Lichtenberg, P.A.: Financial capacity and financial exploitation of older adults: research findings, policy recommendations and clinical implications. Clin. Gerontol. 40, 3–13 (2017)
Tilse, C., Setterlund, D., Wilson, J., Rosenman, L.: Minding the money: a growing responsibility for informal carers. Ageing Soc. 25, 215–227 (2005)
Baldwin, J.N., Napier, S., Neville, S., Wright-St Clair, V.A.: Impacts of older people’s patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a systematic review. Age Ageing 47, 801–809 (2018)
Corrado, A.M., Benjamin-Thomas, T.E., McGrath, C., Hand, C., Laliberte Rudman, D.: Participatory action research with older adults: a critical interpretive synthesis. Gerontologist 60, e413–e427 (2020)
Lushey, C.J., Munro, E.R.: Participatory peer research methodology: an effective method for obtaining young people’s perspectives on transitions from care to adulthood? Qual. Soc. Work. 14, 522–537 (2014)
Littlechild, R., Tanner, D., Hall, K.: Co-research with older people: perspectives on impact. Qual. Soc. Work. 14, 18–35 (2015)
Buffel, T.: Older coresearchers exploring age-friendly communities: an insider perspective on the benefits and challenges of peer-research. Gerontologist 59, 538–548 (2019)
Morrow-Howell, N., Lawlor, E.F., Macias, E.S., Swinford, E., Brandt, J.: Making the case for age-diverse universities. Gerontologist 60, 1187–1193 (2020)
Pettigrew, T.F., Tropp, L.R., Wagner, U., Christ, O.: Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int. J. Intercult. Rel. 35, 271–280 (2011)
Vrkljan, B., et al.: Creating an intergenerational university hub: engaging older and younger users in the shaping of space and place. Gerontol. Geriatr. Educ. 40, 244–260 (2019)
Grigorovich, A., Kontos, P., Jenkins, A., Kirkland, S.: Moving toward the promise of participatory engagement of older adults in gerotechnology. Gerontologist 62, 324–331 (2022)
Righi, V., Sayago, S., Blat, J.: When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a turn to community in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 108, 15–31 (2017)
Dickinson, C., Bamford, C., Exley, C., Emmett, C., Hughes, J., Robinson, L.: Planning for tomorrow whilst living for today: the views of people with dementia and their families on advance care planning. Int. Psychogeriatr. 25, 2011–2021 (2013)
Hershey, D.A., Jacobs-Lawson, J.M., McArdle, J.J., Hamagami, F.: Psychological foundations of financial planning for retirement. J. Adult Dev. 14, 26–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9028-1
Ries, N.M.: Enduring powers of attorney and financial exploitation of older people: a conceptual analysis and strategies for prevention. J. Aging Soc. Policy 34, 357–374 (2022)
Mey, E., van Hoven, B.: Managing expectations in participatory research involving older people: what’s in it for whom? Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 22, 323–334 (2019)
Kong, T.S.K.: Gay and grey: participatory action research in Hong Kong. Qual. Res. 18, 257–272 (2018)
Bombard, Y., et al.: Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement. Sci. 13, 98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z
World Health Organization: Global report on ageism. World Health Organization, Geneva (2021)
Doyle, M., Timonen, V.: Lessons from a community-based participatory research project: older people’s and researchers’ reflections. Res. Aging 32, 244–263 (2010)
Funding
This work was supported by the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (22YJC840004) and the Investor and Financial Education Council (RS190211).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, K., Lou, V. (2023). Developing an Online Learning Tool to Improve Financial Literacy in Older Adults: An Intergenerational Co-design Case Study. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Duffy, V.G., Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14055. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48041-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48041-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48040-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48041-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)