Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring User Engagement in Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality Interventions for Stress Reduction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14055))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

Stress affects individuals across the world, posing significant challenges on the mental and physical states and overall quality of life. These detrimental consequences may include increased risk of mental disorders, such as anxiety, depression, and higher risk to physical ailments. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective interventions which can reduce stress. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) videos and Biofeedback techniques offer supportive approaches in alleviating stress. CBT provides cognitive restructuring and behavioral strategies to modify negative patterns, while Biofeedback utilizes physiological measurements to provide real-time feedback for stress symptom regulation. Integrating CBT, Biofeedback, and immersive technology, such as immersive technologies, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), enhances the effectiveness of stress reduction interventions through immersive and engaging experiences. This paper proposes a solution that combines the principles of CBT videos and Biofeedback techniques within immersive environments. CBT videos within immersive environments provide engaging and immersive therapeutic content, while Biofeedback interventions enable users to regulate their physiological responses in an immersive environment but in real-time, empowering the users to regulate stress levels effectively. Building upon this premise, the study aims to comprehensively assess user engagement and evaluate the effectiveness of immersive interventions in stress reduction across VR, AR, and MR platforms. In addition to measuring user engagement, the study also aims to investigate factors such as user presence, immersion, emotion, and perceived usability to identify the most conducive immersive environment for stress reduction interventions. The research seeks to contribute to the development of personalized and effective stress reduction interventions, providing valuable insights into the potential of immersive technologies for stress minimization. The expected outcome of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of immersive interventions in minimizing stress and promoting wellness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R.C., Schilling, E.A.: Effects of daily stress on negative mood. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57, 808–818 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khansari, D.N., Murgo, A.J., Faith, R.E.: Effects of stress on the immune system. Immunol. Today 11, 170–175 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5699(90)90069-l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elzeiny, S., Qaraqe, M.: Stress classification using photoplethysmogram-based spatial and frequency domain images. Sensors 20, 5312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu, Q., Zheng, F., Xie, Y.: Respiratory training biofeedback system (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/icecc.2011.6067578

  5. Crosswell, A.D., Lockwood, K.G.: Best practices for stress measurement: how to measure psychological stress in health research. Health Psychol. Open 7, 205510292093307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920933072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prabhu, V.G., Stanley, L.M., Linder, C., Morgan, R.: Analyzing the efficacy of a restorative virtual reality environment using HRV biofeedback for pain and anxiety management (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ichms49158.2020.9209432

  7. Suh, A., Prophet, J.: The state of immersive technology research: a literature analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 86, 77–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suh, A., Cheung, C.M., Lin, Y.Q.: Revisiting user engagement: concepts, themes, and opportunities. Presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information System (PACIS), p. 150 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien, H.L., Cairns, P., Hall, M.: A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 112, 28–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., Orús, C.: Impacts of technological embodiment through virtual reality on potential guests’ emotions and engagement. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 30, 1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1770146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kukkakorpi, M., Pantti, M.: A sense of place: VR journalism and emotional engagement. J. Pract. 15, 785–802 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1799237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dow, S., Mehta, M., Harmon, E., MacIntyre, B., Mateas, M.: Presence and engagement in an interactive drama. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240847

  13. Jenkins, H.: Game design as narrative architecture. Computer 44(3), 118–130 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schuemie, M.J., van der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., van der Mast, C.A.P.G.: Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 4, 183–201 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300117884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ 1, 120–126 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120

  16. Sukoco, B.M., Wu, W.-Y.: The effects of advergames on consumer telepresence and attitudes: a comparison of products with search and experience attributes. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 7396–7406 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiore, A.M., Kim, J., Lee, H.-H.: Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. J. Interact. Mark. 19, 38–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, H., Cai, T., Luo, D., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z.: Immersive virtual reality news: a study of user experience and media effects. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 147, 102576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan, S., et al.: Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy on opiate use and retention in methadone maintenance treatment in China: a randomised trial. PLoS ONE 10, e0127598 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Popa, C.O., et al.: Standard CBT versus integrative and multimodal CBT assisted by virtual-reality for generalized anxiety disorder. Front. Psychol. 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008981

  21. Kiluk, B.D., Nich, C., Babuscio, T., Carroll, K.M.: Quality versus quantity: acquisition of coping skills following computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use disorders 105, 2120–2127 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03076.x

  22. Carroll, K.M., et al.: Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy: efficacy and durability of CBT4CBT among cocaine-dependent individuals maintained on methadone. AJP 171, 436–444 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Perciavalle, V., et al.: The role of deep breathing on stress. Neurol. Sci. 38, 451–458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2790-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prabhu, V.G., Linder, C., Stanley, L.M., Morgan, R.: An affective computing in virtual reality environments for managing surgical pain and anxiety (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/aivr46125.2019.00049

  25. Steffen, P.R., et al.: Integrating breathing techniques into psychotherapy to improve HRV: which approach is best? Front. Psychol. 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624254

  26. Jänig, W.: The autonomic nervous system and its coordination by the brain. In: Davidson, R.J. (ed.) Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waxenbaum, J.A., Reddy, V., Varacallo, M.: Anatomy, autonomic nervous system (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Narvaez Linares, N.F., Charron, V., Ouimet, A.J., Labelle, P.R., Plamondon, H.: A systematic review of the trier social stress test methodology: issues in promoting study comparison and replicable research. Neurobiol. Stress 13, 100235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Amon, K.L., Campbell, A.: Can children with AD/HD learn relaxation and breathing techniques through biofeedback video games? Aust. J. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 8, 72–84 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aritzeta, A., Soroa, G., Balluerka, N., Muela, A., Gorostiaga, A., Aliri, J.: Reducing anxiety and improving academic performance through a biofeedback relaxation training program. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 42, 193–202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9367-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K.-M., Hellhammer, D.H.: The ‘trier social stress test’ – a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology 28, 76–81 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen, S., Williamson, G.: Perceived stress in a probability sample of the united states. In: Spacapan, S., Oskamp, S. (eds.) The Social Psychology of Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, pp. 31–67 (1988). Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 10, 266–281 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603

  35. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale, 207–212 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35

Download references

Acknowledgement

This project is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and The National Science Foundation. The award no is 2013651.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA

    Nishu Nath, Apostolos Kalatzis & Laura Stanley

Authors
  1. Nishu Nath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Apostolos Kalatzis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Stanley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nishu Nath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Qin Gao

  2. Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Jia Zhou

  3. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Vincent G. Duffy

  4. Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Margherita Antona

  5. University of Crete and Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Constantine Stephanidis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nath, N., Kalatzis, A., Stanley, L. (2023). Measuring User Engagement in Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality Interventions for Stress Reduction. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Duffy, V.G., Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14055. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48041-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48041-6_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48040-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48041-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation