Abstract
This paper investigates the suitability of different speech features in measuring and monitoring speech quality in order to fulfil the expected level of human perceived quality of experience (QoE) while using applications, such as Microsoft Skype, and Apple FaceTime to name a few. To this end, two speech features, namely; line spectral frequencies (LSF), and multi-resolution auditory model (MRAM) are extracted from the speech signal after processing it through a voice activity detector (VAD). A series of deep neural network (DNN)-based objective no-reference speech quality models (SQMs) are then developed employing a single speech feature and combining both speech features. Two noisy speech datasets, namely; Supplement-23 and NOIZEUS-2240 are used for the experiment. Simulation results demonstrate that the SQM developed using combined speech features results in a better speech quality prediction as compared to the SQM developed using a single speech feature, when tested with distinct types of speech degradations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ITU-T recommendation P.800: Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality (1996)
ITU-T Coded-Speech Database. Series P, Supplement 23 (1998)
Alim, S.A., Rashid, N.K.A.: Some commonly used speech feature extraction algorithms. In: IntechOpen (2018)
Bruhn, S., Grancharov, V., Kleijn, W.B.: Low-complexity, non-intrusive speech quality assessment. US Patent 8,195,449 (2012)
Brunnström, K., Beker, S.A., De Moor, K., Dooms, A., Egger, S.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience (2013)
De Rooij, M., Weeda, W.: Cross-validation: a method every psychologist should know. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 3(2), 248–263 (2020)
Dubey, R.K., Kumar, A.: Non-intrusive speech quality assessment using several combinations of auditory features. Int. J. Speech Technol. 16(1), 89–101 (2013)
Dubey, R.K., Kumar, A.: Comparison of subjective and objective speech quality assessment for different degradation/noise conditions. In: IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication, pp. 261–266 (2015)
Falk, T.H., Xu, Q., Chan, W.Y.: Non-intrusive GMM-based speech quality measurement. In: IEEE ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 125–128 (2005)
Hines, A., Gillen, E., Harte, N.: Measuring and monitoring speech quality for voice over IP with POLQA, ViSQOL and P.563. In: Interspeech, pp. 438–442 (2015)
Hirsch, H.G., Pearce, D.: The Aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions. In: ASR2000-Automatic Speech Recognition: Challenges for the New Millenium ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) (2000)
Hu, Y., Loizou, P.C.: Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Commun. 49(7–8), 588–601 (2007)
Jaiswal, R.: Influence of silence and noise filtering on speech quality monitoring. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), pp. 109–113 (2021)
Jaiswal, R.: Performance analysis of voice activity detector in presence of non-stationary noise. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Robotics, Vision, Signal Processing and Power Applications. LNEE, vol. 829, pp. 59–65. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8129-5_10
Jaiswal, R., Dubey, R.K.: CAQoE: a novel no-reference context-aware speech quality prediction metric. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 19(1s), 1–23 (2023)
Jaiswal, R., Hines, A.: The sound of silence: how traditional and deep learning based VAD influences speech quality monitoring. In: 26th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (2018)
Jaiswal, R., Romero, D.: Implicit wiener filtering for speech enhancement in non-stationary noise. In: 11th International Conference on Information Science and Technology, pp. 39–47. IEEE (2021)
Karmakar, A., Kumar, A., Patney, R.: Design of optimal wavelet packet trees based on auditory perception criterion. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 14(4), 240–243 (2007)
Kim, D.S., Tarraf, A.: ANIQUE+: a new American National Standard for non-intrusive estimation of narrow-band speech quality. Bell Labs Tech. J. 12(1), 221–236 (2007)
Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2015)
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)
Malfait, L., et al.: The ITU-T standard for single-ended speech quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14(6), 1924–1934 (2006)
Naik, G.R.: Advances in Principal Component Analysis: Research and Development. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6704-4
Schroeder, M.R.: Computer Speech: Recognition, Compression, Synthesis. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03861-1
Soni, M.H., Patil, H.A.: Non-intrusive quality assessment of noise-suppressed speech using unsupervised deep features. Speech Commun. 130, 27–44 (2021)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? a new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process. Maga. 26(1), 98–117 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jaiswal, R., Priya, A. (2023). Deep Learning Based Speech Quality Assessment Focusing on Noise Effects. In: Karpov, A., Samudravijaya, K., Deepak, K.T., Hegde, R.M., Agrawal, S.S., Prasanna, S.R.M. (eds) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48312-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48312-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48311-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48312-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)