Skip to main content

Deep Learning Based Speech Quality Assessment Focusing on Noise Effects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14339))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the suitability of different speech features in measuring and monitoring speech quality in order to fulfil the expected level of human perceived quality of experience (QoE) while using applications, such as Microsoft Skype, and Apple FaceTime to name a few. To this end, two speech features, namely; line spectral frequencies (LSF), and multi-resolution auditory model (MRAM) are extracted from the speech signal after processing it through a voice activity detector (VAD). A series of deep neural network (DNN)-based objective no-reference speech quality models (SQMs) are then developed employing a single speech feature and combining both speech features. Two noisy speech datasets, namely; Supplement-23 and NOIZEUS-2240 are used for the experiment. Simulation results demonstrate that the SQM developed using combined speech features results in a better speech quality prediction as compared to the SQM developed using a single speech feature, when tested with distinct types of speech degradations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ITU-T recommendation P.800: Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ITU-T Coded-Speech Database. Series P, Supplement 23 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alim, S.A., Rashid, N.K.A.: Some commonly used speech feature extraction algorithms. In: IntechOpen (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruhn, S., Grancharov, V., Kleijn, W.B.: Low-complexity, non-intrusive speech quality assessment. US Patent 8,195,449 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brunnström, K., Beker, S.A., De Moor, K., Dooms, A., Egger, S.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Rooij, M., Weeda, W.: Cross-validation: a method every psychologist should know. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 3(2), 248–263 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubey, R.K., Kumar, A.: Non-intrusive speech quality assessment using several combinations of auditory features. Int. J. Speech Technol. 16(1), 89–101 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubey, R.K., Kumar, A.: Comparison of subjective and objective speech quality assessment for different degradation/noise conditions. In: IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication, pp. 261–266 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Falk, T.H., Xu, Q., Chan, W.Y.: Non-intrusive GMM-based speech quality measurement. In: IEEE ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 125–128 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hines, A., Gillen, E., Harte, N.: Measuring and monitoring speech quality for voice over IP with POLQA, ViSQOL and P.563. In: Interspeech, pp. 438–442 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hirsch, H.G., Pearce, D.: The Aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions. In: ASR2000-Automatic Speech Recognition: Challenges for the New Millenium ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu, Y., Loizou, P.C.: Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Commun. 49(7–8), 588–601 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaiswal, R.: Influence of silence and noise filtering on speech quality monitoring. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), pp. 109–113 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaiswal, R.: Performance analysis of voice activity detector in presence of non-stationary noise. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Robotics, Vision, Signal Processing and Power Applications. LNEE, vol. 829, pp. 59–65. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8129-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaiswal, R., Dubey, R.K.: CAQoE: a novel no-reference context-aware speech quality prediction metric. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 19(1s), 1–23 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaiswal, R., Hines, A.: The sound of silence: how traditional and deep learning based VAD influences speech quality monitoring. In: 26th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaiswal, R., Romero, D.: Implicit wiener filtering for speech enhancement in non-stationary noise. In: 11th International Conference on Information Science and Technology, pp. 39–47. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karmakar, A., Kumar, A., Patney, R.: Design of optimal wavelet packet trees based on auditory perception criterion. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 14(4), 240–243 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, D.S., Tarraf, A.: ANIQUE+: a new American National Standard for non-intrusive estimation of narrow-band speech quality. Bell Labs Tech. J. 12(1), 221–236 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malfait, L., et al.: The ITU-T standard for single-ended speech quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14(6), 1924–1934 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naik, G.R.: Advances in Principal Component Analysis: Research and Development. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6704-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Schroeder, M.R.: Computer Speech: Recognition, Compression, Synthesis. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03861-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Soni, M.H., Patil, H.A.: Non-intrusive quality assessment of noise-suppressed speech using unsupervised deep features. Speech Commun. 130, 27–44 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? a new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process. Maga. 26(1), 98–117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rahul Jaiswal or Anu Priya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jaiswal, R., Priya, A. (2023). Deep Learning Based Speech Quality Assessment Focusing on Noise Effects. In: Karpov, A., Samudravijaya, K., Deepak, K.T., Hegde, R.M., Agrawal, S.S., Prasanna, S.R.M. (eds) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48312-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48312-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48311-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48312-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics