Skip to main content

Self-directed Learning in Chemistry Laboratory via Simulations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications (ICTERI 2023)

Abstract

Self-directed learning is seen as a key competence for survival in the twenty-first century. Self-directed learning is not about learning; instead, it is a meta-theory about learning how to learn. During the pandemic process, many theoretical and applied courses were conducted via distance education. One of these courses is the general chemistry laboratory. While the laboratory course was conducted with distance education, simulation applications were used. For the general chemistry laboratory experiments, first of all, theoretical lectures were made over zoom. Afterwards, the students performed experiments using simulation. The aim of this research is to determine the effect of the general chemistry laboratory conducted with distance education and simulations on the chemistry laboratory self-efficacy. The research was designed in a quasi-experimental design model. The sample group of the research consists of 25 pre-service chemistry teachers studying at a state university. Data were collected with the chemistry laboratory self-efficacy scale. The data obtained from the chemistry laboratory self-efficacy scale were analyzed. As a result of the research, it was determined that the simulation-supported laboratory application had a significant effect on the psychomotor self-efficacy and cognitive self-efficacy of the pre-service teachers. According to the results of the research, pre-service teachers are worried and afraid that they will not be able to do the experiment in the laboratory, so simulations are effective in increasing psychomotor and cognitive self-efficacy as they are very useful for preparation for the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rüschenpöhler, L., Markic, S.: Secondary school students’ acquisition of science capital in the field of chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 21, 220–236 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mujtaba, T., Sheldrake, R., Reiss, M.J.: Chemistry for all. Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes. Royal Society of Chemistry, England (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gatsby. Key indicators in STEM education. The Gatsby Charitable Foundation, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T.: Children’s aspirations towards science-related careers. Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 20, 7–26 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Özmen, H.: Learning theories and technology supported constructivist learning in science teaching. Turk. Online J. Technol. 3(1), 100–111 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Özden, M.: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of chemistry teachers’ problems encountered during chemistry teaching: samples of Adıyaman and Malatya Pamukkale university. J. Educ. 22, 40–53 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pickering, A.: Constructing Quarks. A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saint-Jean, M.: L’apprentissage par problèmes dans l’enseignement supérieur. Service d’aide à l’enseignement, Université de Montréal, Québec (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Broman, K., Ekborg, M., Johnels, D.: Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemistry in Swedish upper secondary schools. Nordic Stud. Sci. Educ. 7(1), 43–60 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, H.: Problem-solving laboratory exercises. J. Chem. Educ. 64(10), 895–897 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, S.A., et al.: NMC horizon report: 2018 higher education edition (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Giesinger, H.C., Ananthanarayanan, V.: NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sat, M., Ilhan, F., Yukselturk, E.: Comparison and evaluation of augmented reality technologies for designing interactive materials. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smarkola, C.: Efficacy of a planned behavior model: beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(3), 1196–1215 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yilmaz, R.M., Baydas, O.: Pre-service teachers’ behavioral intention to make educational animated movies and their experiences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 41–49 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Honey, M., Hilton, M. (eds.): Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wuttke, H.D., Henke, K., Ludwig, N.: Remote labs versus virtual labs for teaching digital system design. In: International Conference on Compute Systems and Technologies- CompSysTech 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. İnce, E.Y., Kutlu, A.: Web based laboratories [Web Tabanlı Laboratuvarlar] (2016). http://ab.org.tr/ab14/bildiri/34.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2020

  19. Cranmer, G.: One-group pretest–posttest design. In: Allen, M. (ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, pp. 1125–1126. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mertler, C.A.: Chapter 7 quantitative research methods. In: Introduction to Educational Research, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H.H.: How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th edn. Mc Graw HIll, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H.: Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 9th edn., pp. 110–122. Seçkin Press, Ankara (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alkan, F.: Development of chemistry laboratory self-efficacy beliefs scale. J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 15, 350–359 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chin, R., Lee, B.Y.: Analysis of data. In: Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine, pp. 325–359. Academic Press publications, Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Green, S.B., Salkind, N.J.: Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh (Analyzing and Understanding Data), 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., Morgan, G.A.: SPSS for Intermediate Statistics, Use and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abbott, M.L.: Understanding Educational Statistics Using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Wiley, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ghasemi, A., Zahediasl, S.: Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 10(2), 486–489 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kirk, R.E.: Statistics an Introduction, 5th edn. Thomson Higher Education, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Büyüköztürk, Ş.: Manual of data analysis for social sciences. [Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı]. PegemA Yayınları, Ankara (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Y.: Effects of augmented reality game-based learning on students’ engagement. Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B 12(3), 254–270 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nikimaleki, M., Rahimi, M.: Effects of a collaborative AR-enhanced learning environment on learning gains and technology implementation beliefs: evidence from a graduate teacher training course. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38(3), 758–769 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arici, F., Yilmaz, M.: An examination of the effectiveness of problem-based learning method supported by augmented reality in science education. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 39, 446–476 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baabdullah, A.M., Alsulaimani, A.A., Allamnakhrah, A., Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Usage of augmented reality (AR) and development of e-learning outcomes: an empirical evaluation of students’ e-learning experience. Comput. Educ. 177, 104383 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Çetin, H., Ulusoy, M.: The effect of augmented reality-based reading environments on retelling skills: formative experiment. Educ. Inform. Technol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11415-8

  36. Mihindo, W.J., Wachanga, G.B., Anditi, Z.O.: Effects of computer-based simulations teaching approach on learners’ achievement in the learning of chemistry among secondary school learners in Nakuru sub county, Kenya. J. Educ. Pract. 8(5), 65–75 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alkan, F., Koçak, C.: Chemistry laboratory applications supported with simulation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 970–976 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kocak, A.C., Alkan, F.: Technology-supported teaching of volumetric analysis. Cumhuriyet Int. J. Educ. 5(1), 1–9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nkemakolam, O.E., Chinelo, O.F., Jane, M.C.: Effect of computer simulations on secondary school students’ academic achievement in chemistry in Anambra state. Asian J. Educ. Train. 4(4), 284–289 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eckhardt, M., Urhahne, D., Harms, U.: Instructional support for intuitive knowledge acquisition when learning with an ecological computer simulation. Educ. Sci. 8, 94 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hannel, S.L., Cuevas, J.: A study on science achievement and motivation using computer-based simulations compared to traditional hands-on manipulation. Georgia Educ. Res. 15(1), 40–55 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Barba, L.A.: Engineers Code: reusable open learning modules for engineering computations. Comput. Sci. Eng. 22, 26–35 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cascales-Martínez, A., Martínez-Segura, M.-J., Pérez-López, D., Contero, M.: Using an augmented reality enhanced tabletop system to promote learning of mathematics: a case study with students with special educational needs. Eur. J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13(2), 355–380 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K.H., Gräbe, C.: The use of mobile learning in science: a systematic review. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(2), 149–160 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin, Y.-N., Hsia, L.-H., Hwang, G.-J.: Fostering motor skills in physical education: a mobile technology-supported ICRA flipped learning model. Comput. Educ. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Grazioli, G., Ingwerson, A., Santiago, D., Jr., Regan, P., Cho, H.: Foregrounding the code: computational chemistry instructional activities using a highly readable fluid simulation code. J. Chem. Educ. 100(3), 1155–1163 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gerard, L., Linn, M.C., Berkeley, U.C.: Computer-based guidance to support students’ revision of their science explanations. Comput. Educ. 176, 104351 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sus, M., Hadeed, M.: Theory-infused and policy-relevant: on the usefulness of scenario analysis for international relations. Contemp. Secur. Policy 41, 1–24 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Minaslı, E.: Fen ve teknoloji dersi maddenin yapısı ve özellikleri ünitesinin öğretilmesinde simülasyon ve model kullanılmasının başarıya, kavram öğrenmeye ve hatırlamaya etkisi (Tez No: 250817) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü] YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Alkan, F.: Self-directed learning in the analytical chemistry laboratory: examining ınquiry skills. In: Advancing Self-Directed Learning in Higher Education, pp. 43–76. IGI Global Publications (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatma Alkan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alkan, F. (2023). Self-directed Learning in Chemistry Laboratory via Simulations. In: Antoniou, G., et al. Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications. ICTERI 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1980. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48325-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48325-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48324-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48325-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics