Abstract
Self-directed learning is seen as a key competence for survival in the twenty-first century. Self-directed learning is not about learning; instead, it is a meta-theory about learning how to learn. During the pandemic process, many theoretical and applied courses were conducted via distance education. One of these courses is the general chemistry laboratory. While the laboratory course was conducted with distance education, simulation applications were used. For the general chemistry laboratory experiments, first of all, theoretical lectures were made over zoom. Afterwards, the students performed experiments using simulation. The aim of this research is to determine the effect of the general chemistry laboratory conducted with distance education and simulations on the chemistry laboratory self-efficacy. The research was designed in a quasi-experimental design model. The sample group of the research consists of 25 pre-service chemistry teachers studying at a state university. Data were collected with the chemistry laboratory self-efficacy scale. The data obtained from the chemistry laboratory self-efficacy scale were analyzed. As a result of the research, it was determined that the simulation-supported laboratory application had a significant effect on the psychomotor self-efficacy and cognitive self-efficacy of the pre-service teachers. According to the results of the research, pre-service teachers are worried and afraid that they will not be able to do the experiment in the laboratory, so simulations are effective in increasing psychomotor and cognitive self-efficacy as they are very useful for preparation for the experiment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rüschenpöhler, L., Markic, S.: Secondary school students’ acquisition of science capital in the field of chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 21, 220–236 (2020)
Mujtaba, T., Sheldrake, R., Reiss, M.J.: Chemistry for all. Reducing inequalities in chemistry aspirations and attitudes. Royal Society of Chemistry, England (2020)
Gatsby. Key indicators in STEM education. The Gatsby Charitable Foundation, London (2018)
Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T.: Children’s aspirations towards science-related careers. Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 20, 7–26 (2019)
Özmen, H.: Learning theories and technology supported constructivist learning in science teaching. Turk. Online J. Technol. 3(1), 100–111 (2004)
Özden, M.: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of chemistry teachers’ problems encountered during chemistry teaching: samples of Adıyaman and Malatya Pamukkale university. J. Educ. 22, 40–53 (2007)
Pickering, A.: Constructing Quarks. A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1984)
Saint-Jean, M.: L’apprentissage par problèmes dans l’enseignement supérieur. Service d’aide à l’enseignement, Université de Montréal, Québec (1994)
Broman, K., Ekborg, M., Johnels, D.: Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemistry in Swedish upper secondary schools. Nordic Stud. Sci. Educ. 7(1), 43–60 (2011)
Wilson, H.: Problem-solving laboratory exercises. J. Chem. Educ. 64(10), 895–897 (1987)
Becker, S.A., et al.: NMC horizon report: 2018 higher education edition (2018)
Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Giesinger, H.C., Ananthanarayanan, V.: NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition (2017)
Sat, M., Ilhan, F., Yukselturk, E.: Comparison and evaluation of augmented reality technologies for designing interactive materials. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2023)
Smarkola, C.: Efficacy of a planned behavior model: beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(3), 1196–1215 (2008)
Yilmaz, R.M., Baydas, O.: Pre-service teachers’ behavioral intention to make educational animated movies and their experiences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 41–49 (2016)
Honey, M., Hilton, M. (eds.): Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2011)
Wuttke, H.D., Henke, K., Ludwig, N.: Remote labs versus virtual labs for teaching digital system design. In: International Conference on Compute Systems and Technologies- CompSysTech 2005 (2005)
İnce, E.Y., Kutlu, A.: Web based laboratories [Web Tabanlı Laboratuvarlar] (2016). http://ab.org.tr/ab14/bildiri/34.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2020
Cranmer, G.: One-group pretest–posttest design. In: Allen, M. (ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, pp. 1125–1126. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2017)
Mertler, C.A.: Chapter 7 quantitative research methods. In: Introduction to Educational Research, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2022)
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H.H.: How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th edn. Mc Graw HIll, New York (2012)
Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H.: Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 9th edn., pp. 110–122. Seçkin Press, Ankara (2013)
Alkan, F.: Development of chemistry laboratory self-efficacy beliefs scale. J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 15, 350–359 (2016)
Chin, R., Lee, B.Y.: Analysis of data. In: Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine, pp. 325–359. Academic Press publications, Elsevier (2008)
Green, S.B., Salkind, N.J.: Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh (Analyzing and Understanding Data), 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2008)
Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., Morgan, G.A.: SPSS for Intermediate Statistics, Use and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (2005)
Abbott, M.L.: Understanding Educational Statistics Using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Wiley, USA (2011)
Ghasemi, A., Zahediasl, S.: Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 10(2), 486–489 (2012)
Kirk, R.E.: Statistics an Introduction, 5th edn. Thomson Higher Education, USA (2008)
Büyüköztürk, Ş.: Manual of data analysis for social sciences. [Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı]. PegemA Yayınları, Ankara (2006)
Wang, Y.: Effects of augmented reality game-based learning on students’ engagement. Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B 12(3), 254–270 (2022)
Nikimaleki, M., Rahimi, M.: Effects of a collaborative AR-enhanced learning environment on learning gains and technology implementation beliefs: evidence from a graduate teacher training course. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 38(3), 758–769 (2022)
Arici, F., Yilmaz, M.: An examination of the effectiveness of problem-based learning method supported by augmented reality in science education. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 39, 446–476 (2022)
Baabdullah, A.M., Alsulaimani, A.A., Allamnakhrah, A., Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Usage of augmented reality (AR) and development of e-learning outcomes: an empirical evaluation of students’ e-learning experience. Comput. Educ. 177, 104383 (2022)
Çetin, H., Ulusoy, M.: The effect of augmented reality-based reading environments on retelling skills: formative experiment. Educ. Inform. Technol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11415-8
Mihindo, W.J., Wachanga, G.B., Anditi, Z.O.: Effects of computer-based simulations teaching approach on learners’ achievement in the learning of chemistry among secondary school learners in Nakuru sub county, Kenya. J. Educ. Pract. 8(5), 65–75 (2017)
Alkan, F., Koçak, C.: Chemistry laboratory applications supported with simulation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 970–976 (2015)
Kocak, A.C., Alkan, F.: Technology-supported teaching of volumetric analysis. Cumhuriyet Int. J. Educ. 5(1), 1–9 (2016)
Nkemakolam, O.E., Chinelo, O.F., Jane, M.C.: Effect of computer simulations on secondary school students’ academic achievement in chemistry in Anambra state. Asian J. Educ. Train. 4(4), 284–289 (2018)
Eckhardt, M., Urhahne, D., Harms, U.: Instructional support for intuitive knowledge acquisition when learning with an ecological computer simulation. Educ. Sci. 8, 94 (2018)
Hannel, S.L., Cuevas, J.: A study on science achievement and motivation using computer-based simulations compared to traditional hands-on manipulation. Georgia Educ. Res. 15(1), 40–55 (2018)
Barba, L.A.: Engineers Code: reusable open learning modules for engineering computations. Comput. Sci. Eng. 22, 26–35 (2020)
Cascales-MartÃnez, A., MartÃnez-Segura, M.-J., Pérez-López, D., Contero, M.: Using an augmented reality enhanced tabletop system to promote learning of mathematics: a case study with students with special educational needs. Eur. J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13(2), 355–380 (2017)
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K.H., Gräbe, C.: The use of mobile learning in science: a systematic review. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(2), 149–160 (2016)
Lin, Y.-N., Hsia, L.-H., Hwang, G.-J.: Fostering motor skills in physical education: a mobile technology-supported ICRA flipped learning model. Comput. Educ. (2021)
Grazioli, G., Ingwerson, A., Santiago, D., Jr., Regan, P., Cho, H.: Foregrounding the code: computational chemistry instructional activities using a highly readable fluid simulation code. J. Chem. Educ. 100(3), 1155–1163 (2023)
Gerard, L., Linn, M.C., Berkeley, U.C.: Computer-based guidance to support students’ revision of their science explanations. Comput. Educ. 176, 104351 (2021)
Sus, M., Hadeed, M.: Theory-infused and policy-relevant: on the usefulness of scenario analysis for international relations. Contemp. Secur. Policy 41, 1–24 (2020)
Minaslı, E.: Fen ve teknoloji dersi maddenin yapısı ve özellikleri ünitesinin öğretilmesinde simülasyon ve model kullanılmasının başarıya, kavram öğrenmeye ve hatırlamaya etkisi (Tez No: 250817) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü] YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. (2009)
Alkan, F.: Self-directed learning in the analytical chemistry laboratory: examining ınquiry skills. In: Advancing Self-Directed Learning in Higher Education, pp. 43–76. IGI Global Publications (2023)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alkan, F. (2023). Self-directed Learning in Chemistry Laboratory via Simulations. In: Antoniou, G., et al. Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications. ICTERI 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1980. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48325-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48325-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48324-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48325-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)