Abstract
This paper examines 17 case studies from the Open Data Research Network with the objective of identifying capacity of using open (government) data. The method used was a literature review of relevant concepts leading to the construction of a typology checklist to determine the capacity level of data use of each case. The findings are summarised in a stairs of open data capacity with nine of the case studies found to be in the intermediate category and the others in the advanced cluster. The findings have implications for identifying local capacity, capacity building needs, and areas for intervention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, J.M., Sandoval-Ballesteros, I.E.: The global explosion of freedom of information laws. Admin. L. Rev. 58, 85–130 (2006)
Alexander, K., Hausenblas, M.: Describing linked datasets-on the design and usage of void, the’vocabulary of interlinked datasets. In: Linked Data on the Web Workshop (LDOW 09), in Conjunction with 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 09): Citeseer (2009)
Auer, S., et al.: Managing the life-cycle of linked data with the lod2 stack. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7650, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35173-0_1
Berg, E.J.: Rethinking Technical Cooperation: Reforms for Capacity Building in Africa. United Nations Development Programme (1993)
Berners-Lee, T., et al.: Tabulator: exploring and analyzing linked data on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web User Interaction Workshop: Athens, Georgia (2006)
Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data-the Story So Far (2009)
Coglianese, C.: The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Governance 22(4), 529–544 (2009)
Cretu, V., Manolea, B.: The Influence of the Open Government Partnership (Ogp) on the Open Data Discussions, Epsi, Topic Report (2013)
Davies, T.: Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform. A look at open government data use from data. gov. uk) 2010
Davies, T.: Open Data Barometer: 2013 Global Report,” World Wide Web Foundation and Open Data Institute (2013). http://www.opendataresearch.org/dl/odb2013/Open-Data-Barometer-2013-Global-Report.pdf
Davies, T., Frank, M.: There’s no such thing as raw data’: exploring the socio-technical life of a government dataset. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 75–78 ACM (2013)
Davies, T., Perini, F., Alonso, J.: Researching the emerging impacts of open data. World Wide Web foundation (2013). http://www.opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Researching%20the%20emerging%20impacts%20of(20)
Doty, D.H., Glick, W.H.: Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19(2), 230–251 (1994)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(1), 57–74 (1989)
Foerstel, H.N.: Freedom of Information and the Right to Know: The Origins and Applications of the Freedom of Information Act. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport (1999)
Fountain, J.E.: Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press (2004)
Fountain, J.E.: Challenges to Organizational Change: Multi-Level Integrated Information Structures (Miis),” Governance and Information Technology: from Electronic Government to Information Government), pp. 63–83 (2007)
Fraunhofer. The Open Data Platform (2013). http://open-data.fokus.fraunhofer.de/en/platform/
Hartig, O., Langegger, A.: A database perspective on consuming linked data on the web. Datenbank-Spektrum 10(2), 57–66 (2010)
Hawe, P., Noort, M., King, L., Jordens, C.: Multiplying health gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs. Health Policy 39(1), 29–42 (1997)
Hendler, J., Holm, J., Musialek, C., Thomas, G.: Us government linked open data: semantic. data. gov. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27(3), 0025–0031 (2012)
Höchtl, J., Reichstädter, P.: Linked open data-a means for public sector information management. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds.) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2011. LNCS, vol.6866, pp. 330–343 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22961-9_26
Janev, V., Mijović, V., Paunović, D., Milošević, U.: Modeling, fusion and exploration of regional statistics and indicators with linked data tools. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8650, pp. 208–221. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_17
Jänicke, M., Weidner, H.: National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Janssen, K.: The influence of the psi directive on open government data: an overview of recent developments. Gov. Inf. Q. 28(4), 446–456 (2011)
Laffont, J.-J., Martimort, D.: The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)
Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H.: An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 492–503 (2012)
Manolea, B., Cretu, V.: Topic Report No. 2013/10: The Influence of the Open Government Partnership (Ogp) on the Open Data Discussions. European Public Sector Information Platform (2013). http://epsiplatform.eu/topicreports
Mansell, R., Wehn, U.: Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sustainable Development. United Nations Publications (1998)
Marienfeld, F., Schieferdecker, I., Lapi, E., and Tcholtchev, N.: Metadata aggregation at govdata. De: An Experience Report. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, p. 21 ACM (2013)
Marradi, A.: Classification, typology, taxonomy. Qual. Quant. 24(2), 129–157 (1990)
Matheus, R., and Janssen, M. 2013. “Transparency of Civil Society Websites: Towards a Model for Evaluation Websites Transparency,” in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM, pp. 166–169
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M.M., Vaz, J.C.: New perspectives for electronic government in Brazil: the adoption of open government data in national and subnational governments of brazil. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 22–29. ACM (2012)
Matheus, R., Janssen, M.: Transparency dimensions of big and open linked data. In: Janssen, M., Mäntymäki, M., Hidders, J., Klievink, B., Lamersdorf, W., van Loenen, B., Zuiderwijk, A. (eds.) I3E 2015. LNCS, vol. 9373, pp. 236–246. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25013-7_19
Matheus, R., Janssen, M.: How to become a smart city?: Balancing ambidexterity in smart cities. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM (2017)
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., Maheshwari, D.: Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 37(3), 101284 (2020)
Mutuku, L., Mahihu, C.M.: Open Data in Developing Countries
Obama, B.: Transparency and Open Government Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies 2009
Obama, B.: Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information. Washington DC, Executive Order (2013)
Preskill, H., Boyle, S.: Insights into evaluation capacity building: motivations, strategies, outcomes, and lessons learned. Can. J. Program Eval. 23(3), 147–174 (2008)
Preskill, H., Boyle, S.: A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. Am. J. Eval. 29(4), 443–459 (2008)
Rich, P.: The organizational taxonomy: definition and design. Acad. Manag. Rev. 17(4), 758–781 (1992)
Scholl, H.J.: Motives, strategic approach, objectives & focal areas in e-gov-induced change. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. (IJEGR) 1(1), 59–78 (2005)
Sokal, R.R.: Typology and empiricism in taxonomy. J. Theor. Biol. 3(2), 230–267 (1962)
Waterman, R.W., Meier, K.J.: Principal-agent models: an expansion? J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 8(2), 173–202 (1998)
Winn, J.: Open Data and the Academy: An Evaluation of Ckan for Research Data Management (2013)
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: a socio-technical view. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (ed.) Open Government. PAIT, vol. 4, pp. 115–135. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_8
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Open data policies, their implementation and impact: a framework for comparison. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(1), 17–29 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
1 Case study reports are available through each of the case studies on http://www.opendataresearch.org/emergingimpacts.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pinheiro, L., Vaz, J.C., Vieira, R., Hora, L. (2023). Data Use and Capacities Across the Global South: Implications for Open Data Policies and Practice. In: Janssen, M., et al. New Sustainable Horizons in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Solutions. I3E 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50040-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50040-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50039-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50040-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)