Skip to main content

Creating Demand for AI-Based Subscription of Physical Goods: A Consumer Perspective in the Food Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Sustainable Horizons in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Solutions (I3E 2023)

Abstract

Subscription platforms based on artificial intelligence (AI) that offer the delivery of physical goods represent a new frontier in retailing. Therefore, empirical investigation into consumers’ views on the factors driving their motivation to use such platforms is necessary. Considering the lack of research on this front, this study aims to examine consumers’ insights into the enabling and constraining technological affordances of platforms that inhibit or facilitate subscription motivation. Drawing on Regulatory Focus Theory, this study tests the effects of situational prevention-focused and promotion-focused factors on subscription intention. Based on data from 290 respondents, we found that intention is positively influenced by perceived functional congruity, which is determined by perceived service personalization and ease of use. In contrast, the effect of psychological reactance associated with perceived lack of control over service delivery is negative. These findings advance our understanding of the features of platforms offering physical goods subscription services that drive the predisposition to use such platforms, thus informing retailers on how AI can support platform expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pasirayi, S., Fennell, P.B.: The effect of subscription-based direct-to-consumer channel additions on firm value. J. Bus. Res. 123, 355–366 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerschbaumer, R.H., et al.: Subscription commerce: an attachment theory perspective. Int. Rev. Retail, Distrib. Consum. Res. 33(1), 92–115 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roy, A., Ortiz, M.: Is it risky to subscribe? Perceived control and subscription choice. Psychol. Market. 40(2), 365–372 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagner, L., Pinto, C., Amorim, P.: On the value of subscription models for online grocery retail. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 294(3), 874–894 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pantano, E., Stylos, N.: The Cinderella moment: exploring consumers’ motivations to engage with renting as collaborative luxury consumption mode. Psychol. Market. 37(5), 740–753 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhatt, D., Kim, H.-S., Bhatt, S.: Shopping motivations of fashion subscription service consumers. Int. Rev. Retail, Distrib. Consum. Res. 31(5), 549–565 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tao, Q., Xu, Y.: Fashion subscription retailing: an exploratory study of consumer perceptions. J. Fashion Market. Manag.: An Int. J. 22(4) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bray, J., et al.: Thinking inside the box: an empirical exploration of subscription retailing. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 58, 102333 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bischof, S.F., Boettger, T.M., Rudolph, T.: Curated subscription commerce: a theoretical conceptualization. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 54, 101822 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niculescu, M.F., Shin, H., Whang, S.: Underlying consumer heterogeneity in markets for subscription-based IT services with network effects. Inform. Syst. Res. 23(4), 1322–1341 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, N., et al.: Designing subscription menu for software products: whether to release a long-length option. Inform. Manag. 59(6), 103665 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pantano, E., Scarpi, D.: I, robot, you, consumer: measuring artificial intelligence types and their effect on consumers emotions in service. J. Serv. Res. 25(4), 583–600 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wirtz, J., et al.: Corporate digital responsibility in service firms and their ecosystems. J. Serv. Res. 26(2), 173–190 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kopalle, P.K., et al.: Examining artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in marketing via a global lens: current trends and future research opportunities. Int. J. Res. Market. 39(2), 522–540 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins, E.T.: Regulatory focus theory. In: Van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A., Higgins, E. (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Vol. 1, pp. 483–504. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom (2012). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kronemann, B., et al.: How AI encourages consumers to share their secrets? The role of anthropomorphism, personalisation, and privacy concerns and avenues for future research. Spanish J. Market.-ESIC 27(1), 2–19 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nawaz, I.Y.: Characteristics of millennials and technology adoption in the digital age. In: Dadwal, S.S. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Innovations in Technology and Marketing for the Connected Consumer, pp. 241–262. IGI Global (2020). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0131-3.ch012

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, B., Sundar, S.S.: Proactive vs. reactive personalization: can customization of privacy enhance user experience? Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 128, 86–99 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Childers, T.L., et al.: Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J. Retail. 77(4), 511–535 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marikyan, D., et al.: Working in a smart home environment: examining the impact on productivity, well-being and future use intention. Internet Res. (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E.: A systematic review of the smart home literature: a user perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 138, 139–154 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, L., Ota, K., Dong, M.: Humanlike driving: empirical decision-making system for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 67(8), 6814–6823 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Endsley, M.R.: From here to autonomy: lessons learned from human–automation research. Hum. Factors 59(1), 5–27 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins, E.T.: Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 52(12), 1280 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brockner, J., Higgins, E.T.: Regulatory focus theory: implications for the study of emotions at work. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes 86(1), 35–66 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zimmermann, R., et al.: Enhancing brick-and-mortar store shopping experience with an augmented reality shopping assistant application using personalized recommendations and explainable artificial intelligence. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 17(2), 273–298 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sirgy, M.J., Johar, J.: Toward an integrated model of self-congruity and functional congruity. ACR Eur. Adv. 4, 252–256 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brehm, S.S., Brehm, J.W.: Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sirgy, M.J., et al.: Self-congruity versus functional congruity: predictors of consumer behavior. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 19, 363–375 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marikyan, D., et al.: “Alexa, let’s talk about my productivity”: the impact of digital assistants on work productivity. J. Bus. Res. 142, 572–584 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Balakrishnan, J., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Conversational commerce: entering the next stage of AI-powered digital assistants. Ann. Operat. Res. 1–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04049-5

  32. Pansari, A., Kumar, V.: Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 45, 294–311 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Barth, S., De Jong, M.D.: The privacy paradox–Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior–A systematic literature review. Telematics Inform. 34(7), 1038–1058 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inform. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 38(3), 475–487 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Papagiannidis, S., Davlembayeva, D.: Bringing smart home technology to peer-to-peer accommodation: exploring the drivers of intention to stay in smart accommodation. Inform. Syst. Front. 24(4), 1189–1208 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, H., So, K.K.F., Wirtz, J.: Service robots: Applying social exchange theory to better understand human–robot interactions. Tourism Manag. 92, 104537 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Papagiannidis, S., Marikyan, D.: Smart offices: a productivity and well-being perspective. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 51, 102027 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inform. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wnuk, A., Oleksy, T., Maison, D.: The acceptance of Covid-19 tracking technologies: the role of perceived threat, lack of control, and ideological beliefs. PloS one 15(9), e0238973 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Straub, D.W., Welke, R.J.: Coping with systems risk: Security planning models for management decision making. MIS Q. 22(4), 441 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/249551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Clee, M.A., Wicklund, R.A.: Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. J. Consum. Res. 6(4), 389–405 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sirgy, M.J., Samli, A.C.: A path analytic model of store loyalty involving self-concept, store image, geographic loyalty, and socioeconomic status. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 13, 265–291 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Suh, K.-S., Kim, H., Suh, E.K.: What if your avatar looks like you? Dual-congruity perspectives for avatar use. MIS Q. 35, 711–729 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu, S., et al.: Self-image congruence, functional congruence, and mobile app intention to use. Mobile Inform. Syst. 2020, 1–17 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Su, N., Reynolds, D.: Effects of brand personality dimensions on consumers’ perceived self-image congruity and functional congruity with hotel brands. Int. J. Hospitality Manag. 66, 1–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jing, R.: A brief analysis of the influencing mechanism of Internet financial behavior: based on congruity perspective. In: 2018 International Conference on Economics, Business, Management and Corporate Social Responsibility (EBMCSR 2018). Atlantis Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar, V., Nayak, J.K.: The role of self-congruity and functional congruity in influencing tourists’ post visit behaviour. Adv. Hospitality Tourism Res. (AHTR) 2(2), 24–44 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Gupta, A.S., Mukherjee, J.: Decoding revenge buying in retail: role of psychological reactance and perceived stress. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 50(11), 1378–1394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2022-0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brehm, J.W.: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rosenberg, B.D., Siegel, J.T.: A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: do not read this article. Motiv. Sci. 4(4), 281 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Veloutsou, C., McAlonan, A.: Loyalty and or disloyalty to a search engine: the case of young Millennials. J. Consum. Market. 29(2), 125–135 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Dec. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sop, S.A., Kozak, N.: Effects of brand personality, self-congruity and functional congruity on hotel brand loyalty. J. Hospitality Market. Manag. 28(8), 926–956 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang, P., Meng, F., So, K.K.F.: Cocreation experience in peer-to-peer accommodations: conceptualization and scale development. J. Travel Res. 60(6), 1333–1351 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee, G., Lee, J., Sanford, C.: The roles of self-concept clarity and psychological reactance in compliance with product and service recommendations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1481–1487 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hair, J.F., et al.: Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New, International Pearson Education Limited, Essex (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Podsakoff, P.M., et al.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinara Davlembayeva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Davlembayeva, D., Marikyan, D., Pantano, E., Serravalle, F., Babayan, D. (2023). Creating Demand for AI-Based Subscription of Physical Goods: A Consumer Perspective in the Food Industry. In: Janssen, M., et al. New Sustainable Horizons in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Solutions. I3E 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50040-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50040-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50039-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50040-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics