Skip to main content

Reflections on Post Hoc Theorization of ICT4D Action Research Projects

Research-In-Progress

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
After Latour: Globalisation, Inequity and Climate Change (IFIPJWC 2023)

Abstract

Action research is thought to be a useful methodology for knowledge creation in ICT4D research. Researchers applying this methodology may use post hoc theorization, that is, applying theoretical lenses to make sense of the out-comes of the action research interventions after the research is done. In this paper we compare two alternative approaches to the process of post hoc theorizing using a case study of an action research project based in Africa that focuses on developing robust research infrastructures for open science. We employ both actor-network theory concepts used in ICT4D research on large scale infrastructure projects and Activity Theory concepts for the analysis. Separately and complementarily, they are found to offer the potential to theorize the case study’s “theory of change” and approach to action research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bon, A., Akkermans, H.: Digital development: elements of a critical ICT4D theory and praxis. In: Nielsen, P., Kimaro, H.C. (eds.) ICT4D 2019. IAICT, vol. 552, pp. 26–38. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19115-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. de Vries, E.: Rigorously relevant action research in information systems. All Sprouts Content 7(4) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davison, R., Martinsons, M.G., Kock, N.: Principles of canonical action research. Inf. Syst. J. 14(1), 65–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Phelps, R., Hase, S.: Complexity and action research: exploring the theoretical and methodological connections. Educ. Action Res. 10(3), 507–524 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790200200198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aanestad, M., Jolliffe, B., Mukherjee, A., Sahay, S.: Infrastructuring work: building a state-wide hospital information infrastructure in India. Inf. Syst. Res. 25(4), 834–845 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., Shaw, V.: Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Q. 31(2), 381–402 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Braa, J., Monteiro, E., Sahay, S.: Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries. MIS Q. 28(3), 337 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Latifov, M.A., Sahay, S.: Challenges in moving to “health information for action”: an infrastructural perspective from a case study in Tajikistan. Inf. Technol. Dev. 19(3), 215–229 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2012.751575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahay, S., Sæbø, J., Braa, J.: Scaling of HIS in a global context: same, same, but different. Inf. Organ. 23(4), 294–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., Andersson, A.: Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Inf. Technol. Dev. 24(1), 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1396020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsham, G.: Health information systems in developing countries: some reflections on information for action. Inf. Technol. Dev. 26(1), 194–200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1586632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shidende, N.H.: Challenges in implementing patient-centred information systems in Tanzania: an activity theory perspective. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 64(1), 1–20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00455.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LIBSENSE: LIBSENSE; The Power of Open Access and Science. https://libsense.ren.africa/en/. Accessed 26 June 2023

  14. AfricaConect: Africaconnect. https://archive.geant.org/projects/africaconnect/ac1/Pages/Home.html. Accessed 26 June 2023

  15. Harle, J.: Data, dialogue and development – why the last kilometre matters. https://blog.inasp.info/data-dialogue-development-kilometre-matters/. Accessed 30 June 2022

  16. Foley, M.: What is an NREN-2. https://casefornrens.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/What-is-an-NREN.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2023

  17. WACREN: Home - WACREN. https://wacren.net/en/. Accessed 26 June 2023

  18. EIFL: EIFL. https://www.eifl.net/. Accessed 26 June 2023

  19. COAR: Home. https://www.coar-repositories.org/. Accessed 26 June 2023

  20. LIBSENSE Working Group on Open Science policies, governance and leadership: LIBSENSE Statement on Open Science in Africa (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4017999

  21. LIBSENSE: LIBSENSE Regional Open Science Policy Development Workshop (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6467216

  22. LIBSENSE-RUFORUM – LIBSENSE. https://libsense.ren.africa/en/ruforum/. Accessed 30 June 2023

  23. WACREN: LIBSENSE initiates conversation on research assessment reforms in Africa. https://wacren.net/en/libsense-initiates-conversation-on-research-assessment-reforms-in-africa/. Accessed 30 June 2023

  24. IFLA: Guest Article: Connectivity and Cooperation: How RENs, Libraries and Universities Are Combining to Accelerate Open Science « Library Policy and Advocacy Blog. http://blogs.ifla.org/lpa/2021/04/07/guest-article-connectivity-and-cooperation-how-rens-libraries-and-universities-are-combining-to-accelerate-open-science/. Accessed 29 June 2022

  25. Abbott, P., Cox, A.: Perceptions of Rwanda’s research environment in the context of digitalization: reflections on deficit discourses. In: Bandi, R.K., Ranjini, C.R., Klein, S., Madon, S., Monteiro, E. (eds.) IFIPJWC 2020. IAICT, vol. 601, pp. 50–64. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64697-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Reilly, K.: Designing research for the emerging field of open development. Inf. Technol. 7(1), 47 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abbott, P., Appiah, K., Oaiya, O.: Barriers and Enablers to Open Access Repository (OAR) Development and Management in African HLIs: Research from the LIBSENSE OAR Workshops in the UA, WACREN and ASREN Regions. Zenodo (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3884974

  28. Monteiro, E.: Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. In: Ciborra, C. (ed.) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, pp. 71–83. Oxford University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E.: Understanding Information Infrastructure (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hanseth, O., Aanestad, M., Berg, M.: Guest editors’ introduction: actor‐network theory and information systems. What’s so special? Inf. Technol. People. 17(2), 116–123 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840410542466

  31. Walsham, G.: Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research. ITIFIP, pp. 466–480. Springer, Boston, MA (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Callon, M.: Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Law, J. (ed.) Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Routledge, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social [electronic resource]: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., Hatling, M.: Developing information infrastructure: the tension between standardization and flexibility. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values. 21(4), 407–426 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Karanasios, S., Allen, D.: ICT for development in the context of the closure of Chernobyl nuclear power plant: an activity theory perspective. Inf. Syst. J. 23(4), 287–306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Karanasios, S., Nardi, B., Spinuzzi, C., Malaurent, J.: Moving forward with activity theory in a digital world. Mind Cult. Act. 28(3), 234–253 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2021.1914662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karanasios, S., Allen, D.: Activity theory in information systems research. Inf. Syst. J. 28(3), 439–441 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Engeström, Y.: Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In: Punamäki, R.-L., Miettinen, R., and Engeström, Y. (eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 377–404. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.025

  39. Karanasios, S., Allen, D.: Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(5), 529–542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wagg, S.: An investigation of digital inclusion in UK rural communities (2021). https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/thesis/An_investigation_of_digital_inclusion_in_UK_rural_communities/17026574/1

  41. Vassilakopoulou, P., Hustad, E.: Bridging digital divides: a literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Front. 25(3), 955–969 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mervyn, K., Simon, A., Allen, D.K.: Digital inclusion and social inclusion: a tale of two cities. Inf. Commun. Soc. 17(9), 1086–1104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.877952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wagg, S., Simeonova, B.: A policy-level perspective to tackle rural digital inclusion. Inf. Technol. People 35(7), 1884–1911 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2020-0047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Allen, D.K., Irnazarow, A., McLauglin, F.: Practice, information and the development of a digital platform. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56(1), 597–598 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Abbott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abbott, P., Wagg, S. (2023). Reflections on Post Hoc Theorization of ICT4D Action Research Projects. In: Jones, M.R., Mukherjee, A.S., Thapa, D., Zheng, Y. (eds) After Latour: Globalisation, Inequity and Climate Change. IFIPJWC 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 696. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50153-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50154-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics