Abstract
Ciardelli et al. (2018b) adopt the framework of inquisitive semantics to provide a novel semantics for counterfactuals. They argue in favour of adopting inquisitive semantics based on experimental evidence that De Morgan’s law, which fails in inquisitive semantics, is invalid in counterfactual antecedents. We show that a unique feature of inquisitive semantics—the fact that its meanings are downward closed—leads to difficulties for Ciardelli et al.’s semantic account of their data. The scenarios we consider suggest either adopting a semantic framework other than inquisitive semantics, or developing a non-semantic explanation of the phenomena Ciardelli et al. (2018b) seek to explain.
Thanks to Ivano Ciardelli, Alexandre Cremers, Morwenna Hoeks, Hana Möller Kalpak, Jonathan Pesetsky, Floris Roelofsen, Katrin Schulz and Zhuoye Zhao for very helpful comments. Thanks also to the participants of the ILLC inquisitive semantics seminar.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aloni, M., Ciardelli, I.: A semantics for imperatives. Unpublished manuscript (2011). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9cdd/fb56130329b403ff5240dbeb5ef3e3f2ccaa.pdf
Alonso-Ovalle, L.: Disjunction in alternative semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst (2006). http://people.linguistics.mcgill.ca/luis.alonso-ovalle/papers/alonso-ovalle-diss.pdf
Alonso-Ovalle, L.: Counterfactuals, correlatives, and disjunction. Linguist. Philos. 32(2), 207–244 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9059-0
Briggs, R.: Interventionist counterfactuals. Philos. Stud. 160(1), 139–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9908-5
Chierchia, G.: Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In: Structures and Beyond, pp. 39–103. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Ciardelli, I.: Lifting conditionals to inquisitive semantics. Semant. Linguist. Theory 26, 732–752 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3811
Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F.: Hurford’s constraint, the semantics of disjunction, and the nature of alternatives. Nat. Lang. Semant. 25(3), 199–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9134-y
Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F., Theiler, N.: Composing alternatives. Linguist. Philos. 40(1), 1–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9195-2
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive Semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018a)
Ciardelli, I., Zhang, L., Champollion, L.: Two switches in the theory of counterfactuals. Linguist. Philos. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-018-9232-4
Fine, K.: Counterfactuals without possible worlds. J. Philos. 109(3), 221–246 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201210938
Fine, K.: Truth-maker semantics for intuitionistic logic. J. Philos. Log. 43(2), 549–577 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9281-7
Fine, K.: Truthmaker semantics. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, chapter 22, pp. 556–577. Wiley, Hoboken (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118972090.ch22
Güngör, H.: Counterfactuals, hyperintensionality and hurford disjunctions. Linguist. Philos. 1–27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09360-3
Hamblin, C.L.: Questions in Montague English. In: Montague Grammar, pp. 247–259. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-545850-4.50014-5
Hurford, J.R.: Exclusive or inclusive disjunction. Found. Lang. 11, 409–411 (1974)
Katzir, R., Singh, R.: Hurford disjunctions: embedded exhaustification and structural economy. Proc. Sinn und Bedeuting 18, 201–216 (2013). https://semanticsarchive.net/sub2013/SeparateArticles/Katzir &Singh.pdf
Kratzer, A., Shimoyama, J.: Indeterminate pronouns: the view from Japanese. In: Otsu, Y. (ed.) The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp. 1–25 (2002). https://people.umass.edu/partee/RGGU_2004/Indeterminate%20Pronouns.pdf
Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Wiley, Hoboken (1973)
Meyer, M.-C.: Ignorance and grammar. Ph.D. thesis, MIT (2013)
Meyer, M.-C.: Deriving Hurford’s constraint. Semant. Linguist. Theory 24, 577–596 (2014)
Partee, B.: Topic, focus and quantification. Semant. Linguist. Theory 1, 159–188 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v1i0.2918
Roelofsen, F., van Gool, S.: Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highlighting. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds.) Logic, Language and Meaning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6042, pp. 384–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_39
Romoli, J., Santorio, P., Wittenberg, E.: Alternatives in counterfactuals: what is right and what is not. J. Semant. 39(2), 213–260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab023
Santorio, P.: Alternatives and truthmakers in conditional semantics. J. Philos. 115(10), 513–549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20181151030
Santorio, P.: Interventions in premise semantics. Philosophers’ Imprint (2019). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0019.001
Schulz, K.: The similarity approach strikes back: negation in counterfactuals. In: Sauerland, U., Solt, S. (eds.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, volume 2 of ZASPiL, vol. 61, pp. 343–360. Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics, Berlin (2018). https://semanticsarchive.net/sub2018/Schulz.pdf
Simons, M.: Disjunction and alternativeness. Linguist. Philos. 24(5), 597–619 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017597811833
Stalnaker, R.: A theory of conditionals. In: Harper, W.L., Stalnaker, R., Pearce, G. (eds.) Ifs, pp. 41–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9117-0_2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
McHugh, D. (2024). A Problem for Downward Closure in the Semantics of Counterfactuals. In: Pavlova, A., Pedersen, M.Y., Bernardi, R. (eds) Selected Reflections in Language, Logic, and Information. ESSLLI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50628-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50628-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50627-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50628-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
