Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-Way Conflict Analysis for Three-Valued Situation Tables with Rankings and Reference Tuples

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rough Sets (IJCRS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14481))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, the researches of conflict analysis are increasing with the development of three-way decisions, and three-way decisions with rankings and reference tuples provides new perspectives for conflict analysis. In this paper, we first divide a whole set of issues into a bundle of supported issues and a bundle of non-supported issues, and a bundle of opposed issues and a bundle of non-opposed issues, respectively, from the perspectives of support and opposition. Accordingly, we give two ranking orders and two reference tuples. Then, we put forward alliance and conflict measures by considering weights of issues, and develop models of three-way conflict analysis with ideas of rankings and reference tuples. Finally, we show how to compute the alliance, neutral and conflict coalitions with the proposed models. It provides an attempt to study conflict problems with thoughts of rankings and reference tuples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deja, R.: Conflict Analysis, Rough Set Methods and Applications, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pp. 491–520 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Du, J.L., Liu, S.F., Liu, Y., Yi, J.H.: A novel approach to three-way conflict analysis and resolution with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 584, 65–88 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng, X.F., Yang, H.L., Guo, Z.L.: Three-way conflict analysis in dual hesitant fuzzy situation tables. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 154, 109–132 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, M.J.: Modeling relationships in three-way conflict analysis with subsethood measures. Knowl.-Based Syst. 260, 110131 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang, C.M., Duan, Y., Guo, D.D.: Effectiveness measure in change-based three-way decision. Soft. Comput. 27, 2783–2793 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, C.M., Xu, R.Y., Wang, P.X.: Measuring effectiveness of movement-based three-way decision using fuzzy Markov model. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 152, 456–469 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang, G.M., Yao, Y.Y.: New measures of alliance and conflict for three-way conflict analysis. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 132, 49–69 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang, G.M., Yao, Y.Y.: Formal concept analysis perspectives on three-way conflict analysis. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 152, 160–182 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, T.B., Qiao, J.S., Ding, W.P.: Three-way conflict analysis and resolution based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 638, 118959 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo, J.F., Hu, M.J., Lang, G.M., Qin, K.Y.: Three-way conflict analysis based on alliance and conflict functions. Inf. Sci. 594, 322–359 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlak, Z.: On conflicts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 21, 127–134 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts. Inf. Sci. 109, 65–78 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, B.Z., Chen, X.T., Zhang, L.Y., Ma, W.M.: Three-way decision making approach to conflict analysis and resolution using probabilistic rough set over two universes. Inf. Sci. 507, 809–822 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, B.Z., Ma, W.M., Zhao, H.Y.: Rough set-based conflict analysis model and method over two universes. Inf. Sci. 372, 111–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suo, L.W.Q., Yang, H.L.: Three-way conflict analysis based on incomplete situation tables: a tentative study. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 145, 51–74 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, T.X., Huang, B., Li, H.X., Liu, D., Yu, H.: Three-way decision for probabilistic linguistic conflict analysis via compounded risk preference. Inf. Sci. 631, 65–90 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, L., Pei, Z., Qin, K.: A novel conflict analysis model based on the formal concept analysis. Appl. Intell. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04051-9

  18. Xu, W.Y., Jia, B., Li, X.N.: A two-universe model of three-way decision with ranking and reference tuple. Inf. Sci. 581, 808–839 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, W.Y., Jia, B., Li, X.N.: A generalized model of three-way decision with ranking and reference tuple. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 144, 51–68 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, W.Y., Yan, Y.C., Li, X.N.: Three-way decision with ranking and reference tuple on information tables. Inf. Sci. 613, 682–716 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao, J.T., Medina, J., Zhang, Y., Slezak, D.: Formal concept analysis, rough sets, and three-way decisions. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 140, 1–6 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, H.L., Wang, Y., Guo, Z.L.: Three-way conflict analysis based on hybrid situation tables. Inf. Sci. 628, 522–541 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 180, 341–353 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way conflict analysis: reformulations and extensions of the Pawlak model. Knowl.-Based Syst. 180, 26–37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way granular computing, rough sets, and formal concept analysis. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 116, 106–125 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, H., Wang, X.C., Wang, G.Y., Zeng, X.H.: An active three-way clustering method via low-rank matrices for multi-view data. Inf. Sci. 507, 823–839 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhan, J.M., Wang, J.J., Ding, W.P., Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way behavioral decision making with hesitant fuzzy information systems: survey and challenges. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 10(2), 330–350 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, X.Y., Chen, J.: Three-hierarchical three-way decision models for conflict analysis: a qualitative improvement and a quantitative extension. Inf. Sci. 587, 485–514 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, H.Y., Yang, S.Y.: Three-way group decisions with interval-valued decision-theoretic rough sets based on aggregating inclusion measures. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 110, 31–45 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhi, H.L., Li, J.H., Li, Y.N.: Multi-level conflict analysis based on fuzzy formal contexts. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 30(12), 5128–5142 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62076040), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2020JJ3034), the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (No. 22A0233), the Scientific Research Fund of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Computational Intelligence (No. 2020FF04), the Graduate Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province (No. CX20220952).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, 410114, Hunan, China

    Shuting Liu & Guangming Lang

  2. Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, B3H 3C3, Canada

    Mengjun Hu

  3. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China

    Zhifei Zhang

Authors
  1. Shuting Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengjun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhifei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guangming Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangming Lang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy

    Andrea Campagner

  2. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Oliver Urs Lenz

  3. Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China

    Shuyin Xia

  4. University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Dominik Ślęzak

  5. AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

    Jarosław Wąs

  6. University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada

    JingTao Yao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, S., Hu, M., Zhang, Z., Lang, G. (2023). Three-Way Conflict Analysis for Three-Valued Situation Tables with Rankings and Reference Tuples. In: Campagner, A., Urs Lenz, O., Xia, S., Ślęzak, D., Wąs, J., Yao, J. (eds) Rough Sets. IJCRS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14481. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50958-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50959-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation