Abstract
Psychological safety, a pivotal factor in team dynamics, has been proposed as a crucial determinant of success in agile software development (ASD) teams and learning. However, the extent of its influence within the domain of large-scale agile (LSA) software development teams remains underexplored. This research investigates the multifaceted dimensions of psychological safety within LSA teams, examining both its precursors and outcomes. This study conducted semi-structured interviews with software professionals actively involved in LSA projects within a Swedish software consultancy company. The findings underscore the intricate nature of establishing a psychologically safe environment within LSA teams, revealing it as a multidimensional construct necessitating a proactive leadership approach, fostering open communication, and cultivating an ecosystem of constructive feedback. The study highlights the critical importance of intentionally shaping teams to facilitate continuous learning, ensuring remuneration safety, and implementing a comprehensive onboarding process for incoming team members. By fostering psychologically safe settings, LSA teams enhanced teamwork dynamics, heightened job satisfaction, and facilitation continuous learning and development. Notably, the absence of such an environment exacerbates the phenomenon of brain drain, exposing the tangible consequences of overlooking this fundamental aspect of organizational culture. This study proposes avenues for future research directions, aiming to further unravel the nuances of psychological safety and its cascading effects within the realm of contemporary LSA software development context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beecham, S., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H., Sharp, H.: Motivation in software engineering: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(9–10), 860–878 (2008)
Ahmad, M.O., Gustavsson, T.: The pandora’s box of social, process, and people debts in software engineering. J. Software Evol. Process (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2516
Lenberg, P., Feldt, R.: Psychological safety and norm clarity in software engineering teams. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (2018)
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 87–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
Kalenda, M., Hyna, P., Rossi, B.: Scaling agile in large organizations: Practices, challenges, and success factors. J. Software Evol. Process 30(10), e1954 (2018)
Edmondson, A.: Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(2), 350–383 (1999)
Gustavsson, T.: Team performance in large-scale agile software development. In: Insfran, E., González, F., Abrahão, S., Fernández, M., Barry, C., Lang, M., Linger, H., Schneider, C. (eds.) Advances in Information Systems Development. LNISO, vol. 55, pp. 237–254. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95354-6_14
Ahmad, M.O.: psychological safety, leadership and non-technical debt in large-scale agile software development. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, pp. 327–334 (2023)
Newman, A., Donohue, R., Eva, N.: Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 27(3), 521–535 (2017)
Delizonna, L.: High-performing teams need psychological safety: here’s how to create it (2017). https://hbr.org/2017/08/high-performing-teams-need-psychological-safety-heres-how-to-create-it
Safdar, U., Badir, Y.F., Afsar, B.: Who can I ask? how psychological safety affects knowledge sourcing among new product development team members. J. High Technol. Managem. Res. 28(1), 79–92 (2017)
Manifesto, A.: Manifesto for agile software development (2001). https://agilemanifesto.org/
Edison, H., Wang, X., Conboy, K.: Comparing methods for large-scale agile software development: a systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 48(8), 2709–2731 (2021)
Dreesen, T., Hennel, P., Rosenkranz, C., Kude, T.: The second vice is lying, the first is running into debt. Antecedents and Mitigating Practices of Social Debt: An Exploratory Study in Distributed Software Development Teams. HICSSA. (2021)
Detert, J.R., Burris, E.R.: Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Acad. Manag. J. 50(4), 869–884 (2007)
Edmondson, A.C., Kramer, R.M., Cook, K.S.: Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. Trust Distrust Organ. Dilemmas Approaches 12(2004), 239–272 (2004)
Baer, M., Frese, M.: Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. Int. J. Ind. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 24(1), 45–68 (2003)
Carmeli, A., Gittell, J.H.: High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 30(6), 709–729 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.565
Nembhard, I.M., Edmondson, A.C.: Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. Int. J. Ind. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 27(7), 941–966 (2006)
Hennel, P., Rosenkranz, C.: Investigating the “Socio” in socio-technical development: the case for psychological safety in agile information systems development. Proj. Manag. J. 52(1), 11–30 (2021)
Valentine, M.A., Edmondson, A.C.: Team scaffolds: how mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2), 405–422 (2015)
O’Neill, O.A.: Workplace expression of emotions and escalation of commitment 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 39(10), 2396–2424 (2009)
Glaser, B.G.: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs Forcing. Sociology press (1992)
Stol, K.-J., Ralph, P., Fitzgerald, B.: Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 120–131 (2016)
Adolph, S., Kruchten, P.: Summary for scrutinizing agile practices or shoot-out at process corral! In: Companion of the 30th International Conference on Software engineering, pp. 1031–1032 (2008)
James, N., Busher, H.: Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing. Qual. Res. 6(3), 403–420 (2006)
Kakar, A.K.: How do team cohesion and psychological safety impact knowledge sharing in software development projects? Knowl. Process. Manag. 25(4), 258–267 (2018)
Verwijs, C., Russo, D.: The double-edged sword of diversity: how diversity, conflict, and psychological safety impact agile software teams. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12954 (2023)
Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., Dutton, J.E.: Learning behaviours in the workplace: the role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. Official J. Int. Fed. Syst. Res. 26(1), 81–98 (2009)
Gittell, J.H.: A theory of relational coordination. In: Cameron, K.S., Dutton ve RE Quinn, J.E., (Ed.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, pp. 279–295. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers (2003)
Gittell, J.H.: Relational coordination: coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies: A Research Companion, pp. 74–94 (2006)
Kahn, W.A.: Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 33(4), 692–724 (1990)
Alami, A., Zahedi, M., Krancher, O.: Antecedents of psychological safety in agile software development teams. Inf. Softw. Technol. 162, 107267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107267
Edmondson, A.C., Lei, Z.: Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1(1), 23–43 (2014)
Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE Softw. 22(5), 30–39 (2005)
Jehn, K.A., Mannix, E.A.: The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Manag. J. 44(2), 238–251 (2001)
Thorgren, S., Caiman, E.: The role of psychological safety in implementing agile methods across cultures. Res. Technol. Manag. 62(2), 31–39 (2019)
Alami, A., Krancher, O., Paasivaara, M.: The journey to technical excellence in agile software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 150, 106959 (2022)
Cunningham, W.: The WyCash portfolio management system. ACM Sigplan Oops Messenger 4(2), 29–30 (1992)
McConnell, S.: Managing Technical Debt. Construx Software Builders, Inc., pp. 1–14 (2008)
Avgeriou, P., Kruchten, P., Nord, R.L., Ozkaya, I., Seaman, C.: Reducing friction in software development. IEEE Softw. 33(1), 66–73 (2015)
Lenarduzzi, V., Besker, T., Taibi, D., Martini, A., Fontana, F.A.: A systematic literature review on technical debt prioritization: strategies, processes, factors, and tools. J. Syst. Softw. 171, 110827 (2021)
Williams, L., Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: it’s about feedback and change. Computer 36(6), 39–43 (2003)
Dingsøyr, T., Fægri, T.E., Itkonen, J.: What Is large in large-scale? a taxonomy of scale for agile software development. In: Jedlitschka, A., Kuvaja, P., Kuhrmann, M., Männistö, T., Münch, J., Raatikainen, M. (eds.) PROFES 2014. LNCS, vol. 8892, pp. 273–276. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_20
Tkalich, A., Šmite, D., Andersen, N.H., Moe, N.B.: What happens to psychological safety when going remote?. IEEE Software (2022)
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C.K., Homan, A.C.: Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(6), 1008 (2004)
Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M.C.: Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 515–541 (2007)
Przybylek, A., Albecka, M., Springer, O., Kowalski, W.: Game-based Sprint retrospectives: multiple action research. Empir Software Eng 27, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10043-z
Kowalczyk, M., Marcinkowski, B., Przybyłek, A.: Scaled agile framework. dealing with software process-related challenges of a financial group with the action research approach. J. Softw. Evol. Process 34(6), e2455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2455
Joskowski, A., Przybyłek, A., Marcinkowski, B.: Scaling scrum with a customized nexus framework: a report from a joint industry‐academia research project. Softw. Pract. Experience 53(7), 1525–1542 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3201
Ahmad, M.O., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., Oivo, M.: Kanban in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 137, 96–113 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.045
Ahmad, M.O., Lwakatare, L.E., Kuvaja, P., Oivo, M., Markkula, J.: An empirical study of portfolio management and Kanban in agile and lean software companies. J. Softw. Evol. Process 29(6), e1834 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1834
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Knowledge Foundation, Sweden, through the NODLA project and Helge Ax:son Johnsons Stiftelse.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ahmad, M.O., Gustavsson, T. (2024). Nexus Between Psychological Safety and Non-Technical Debt in Large-Scale Agile Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Development. In: Jarzębowicz, A., Luković, I., Przybyłek, A., Staroń, M., Ahmad, M.O., Ochodek, M. (eds) Software, System, and Service Engineering. KKIO 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 499. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51075-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51075-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51074-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51075-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)