Abstract
Identification of an Orthopaedic Implant before a revision surgery is very important. Failure to identify an implant causes surgical planning delays, inability to plan for the correct equipment requirements, and can result in poorer patient outcomes. This paper proposes a framework to identify, make and model of two different reverse shoulder implants from X-ray images using Deep Learning Techniques. Both Anterior Posterior and Lateral views of X-rays were used in the study and a comparison was made to identify which view enables better results in identification. Various pre-trained deep learning models such as VGG16, VGG19 and InceptionV3 were used for classification of implants. The proposed methodology identifies both the make and model of the implant with an accuracy of 95% using both Anterior Posterior and Lateral Views and an accuracy of 86.67% using only the Anterior view.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Urban, G., Porhemmat, S., Stark, M., Feeley, B., Okada, K., Baldi, P.: Classifying shoulder implants in X-ray images using deep learning. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 967–972 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.04.005
Sultan, H., Owais, M., Park, C., Mahmood, T., Haider, A., Park, K.R.: Artificial intelligence-based recognition of different types of shoulder implants in X-ray scans based on dense residual ensemble-network for personalized medicine. J. Personalized Med. 11(6), 482 (2021)
Hermena, S., Rednam, M.: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 1 October 2022. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; PMID: 34662059, January 2023
Harrison, A.K., Knudsen, M.L., Braman, J.P.: Hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 13, 501–508 (2020)
Farley, K.X., Wilson, J.M., Daly, C.A., Gottschalk, M.B., Wagner, E.R.: The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared to hip and knee arthroplasty. JSES Open Access 3(4), 244 (2019)
Klug, A., Herrmann, E., Fischer, S., Hoffmann, R., Gramlich, Y.: Projections of primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty until 2040: facing a massive rise in fracture-related procedures. J. Clin. Med. 10(21), 5123 (2021)
Villatte, G., Erivan, R., Barth, J., Bonnevialle, N., Descamps, S., Boisgard, S.: Progression and projection for shoulder surgery in France, 2012–2070: epidemiologic study with trend and projection analysis. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 106(6), 1067–1077 (2020)
Padegimas, E.M., Maltenfort, M., Lazarus, M.D., Ramsey, M.L., Williams, G.R., Namdari, S.: Future patient demand for shoulder arthroplasty by younger patients: national projections. Clin. Orthopaedics Relat. Res. 473, 1860–1867 (2015)
Fossati, C., Vitale, M., Forin Valvecchi, T., Gualtierotti, R., Randelli, P.S.: Management of painful shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review. Pain Ther. 9, 427–439 (2020)
Borjali, A., Chen, A.F., Muratoglu, O.K., Morid, M.A., Varadarajan, K.M.: Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network. J. Orthopaedic Res. 38(7), 1465–1471 (2020)
Olczak, J., et al.: Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs: deep learning algorithms—are they on par with humans for diagnosing fractures? Acta Orthop. 88(6), 581–586 (2017)
Borjali, A., et al.: Comparing the performance of a deep convolutional neural network with orthopedic surgeons on the identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs. Med. Phys. 48(5), 2327–2336 (2021)
Takahashi, T., Nozaki, K., Gonda, T., Mameno, T., Wada, M., Ikebe, K.: Identification of dental implants using deep learning—pilot study. Int. J. Implant Dent. 6, 1–6 (2020)
Tiulpin, A., Thevenot, J., Rahtu, E., Lehenkari, P., Saarakkala, S.: Automatic knee osteoarthritis diagnosis from plain radiographs: a deep learning-based approach. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–10 (2018)
Yi, P.H., et al.: Automated detection and classification of shoulder arthroplasty models using deep learning. Skeletal Radiol. 49, 1623–1632 (2020)
Vo, M.T., Vo, A.H., Le, T.: A robust framework for shoulder implant X-ray image classification. Data Technol. Appl. 56(3), 447–460 (2022)
Mikołajczyk, A., Grochowski, M.: Data augmentation for improving deep learning in image classification problem. In: 2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW), pp. 117–122. IEEE (2018)
Khalifa, N.E., Loey, M., Mirjalili, S.: A comprehensive survey of recent trends in deep learning for digital images augmentation. Artif. Intell. Rev. 55, pp. 1–27 (2022)
Sarker, I.H.: Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2(6), 420 (2021)
Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)
Bansal, M., Kumar, M., Sachdeva, M., Mittal, A.: Transfer learning for image classification using VGG19: Caltech-101 image data set. J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput. 14, 1–12 (2021)
Wang, C., et al.: Pulmonary image classification based on inception-v3 transfer learning model (2019)
Sistaninejhad, B., Rasi, H., Nayeri, P.: A review paper about deep learning for medical image analysis. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2023, 1 (2023)
Vakili, M., Ghamsari, M., Rezaei, M.: Performance analysis and comparison of machine and deep learning algorithms for IoT data classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.09636 (2020)
Ramanathan, A., Christy Bobby, T.: Classification of corpus callosum layer in mid-saggital MRI images using machine learning techniques for autism disorder. In: Modeling, Machine Learning and Astronomy: First International Conference, MMLA 2019, Bangalore, India, 22–23 November 2019, Revised Selected Papers, vol. 1, pp. 78–91. Springer Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6463-9_7
Lydia, A., Francis, S.: AdaGrad—an optimizer for stochastic gradient descent. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 6(5), 566–568 (2019)
Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
Ruder, S.: An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747 (2016)
Yılmaz, A.: Shoulder implant manufacturer detection by using deep learning: proposed channel selection layer. Coatings 11(3), 346 (2021)
Geng, E.A., et al.: Development of a machine learning algorithm to identify total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implants from X-ray images. J. Orthop. 35, 74–78 (2023)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dubey, V.P. et al. (2024). Automated Make and Model Identification of Reverse Shoulder Implants Using Deep Learning Methodology. In: Santosh, K., et al. Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. RTIP2R 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53085-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53085-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53084-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53085-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)