Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Driving Behaviour Models with Newly Collected Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI Approaches for Designing and Evaluating Interactive Intelligent Systems (ROCHI 2022)

Abstract

Driving behaviour analysis is an actual research subject as cities and, more especially, roads become full of cars and ride-sharing applications are more and more popular. Interactive intelligent systems have started to become more and more part of our lives being used in our homes, cars, at school, at shopping, and almost everywhere. The driving behaviour system presented in this chapter is one of those intelligent systems that use AI to detect driving styles seamlessly and to provide feedback for both the driver and the driver’s employer. In this chapter, we present a new dataset along with its design and evaluation based on a set of experiments for estimating driving behaviour. Our method aims to provide a simple-to-use and efficient solution targeting a wide variety of scenarios for collecting data and providing results. We consider that an easy-to-use application which doesn’t get the user involved too much is the key to a usable car application because the user should focus mainly on driving. The method used for building the dataset is based on a mobile application which collects gyroscope and accelerometer data from a smartphone’s integrated sensors. The experiments are conducted using both machine learning and deep learning building models trained on different data configurations. Our experiments present a good and robust accuracy on both the first set of datasets and even after adding a new one. The results show that the application can be used for the estimation of specific driving behaviour and can be integrated into a larger system for further usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Driving Behavior competition, https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/driving-behaviour.

  2. 2.

    Driving Behavior, https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/outofskills/driving-behavior.

References

  1. I. Cojocaru, P.-S. Popescu, Building a driving behaviour dataset, in RoCHI 2022, Craiova, Romania (6-7 Oct 2022), pp. 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Cojocaru, P.-S. Popescu, C. Mihaescu, Driver behaviour analysis based on deep learning algorithms, in RoCHI 2022, Craiova, Romania (6-7 Oct 2022), pp. 108–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Peppes, T. Alexakis, E. Adamopoulou, K. Demestichas, Driving behaviour analysis using machine and deep learning methods for continuous streams of vehicular data. Sensors 21(14), 4704 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.M. Hankey, M.A. Perez, J.A. McClafferty, Description of the shrp 2 naturalistic database and the crash, near-crash, and baseline data sets. Technical report, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.V. Moniaga, S.R. Manalu, D.A. Hadipurnawan, F. Sahidi, Diagnostics vehicle’s condition using obd-ii and raspberry pi technology: study literature. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 978, 012011 (2018). (IOP Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.-Y. Tsai, A. Majumdar, Y. Wang, W.-H. Hsu, J.-H. Kang, K.-Y. Lee, C.-H. Tseng, Y.-C. Kuan, H.-C. Lee, C.-J. Wu, et al., Machine learning model for aberrant driving behaviour prediction using heart rate variability: a pilot study involving highway bus drivers. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 1–11 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Breiman, Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D.R. Cox, The regression analysis of binary sequences. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 20(2), 215–232 (1958)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Cortes, V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G.I. Webb, E. Keogh, R. Miikkulainen, Naïve Bayes. Encycl. Mach. Learn. 15(1), 713–714 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Chung, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, Y. Bengio, Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling (2014). arXiv:1412.3555

  12. Z.E. Abou Elassad, H. Mousannif, H. Al Moatassime, A. Karkouch, The application of machine learning techniques for driving behavior analysis: a conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103312 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Q.-T.-A. Khan, S. Abbas, M.A. Khan, A. Fatima, S. Alanazi, N.S. Elmitwally, Modelling intelligent driving behaviour using machine learning. Comput. Mater. Continua 68(3) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Talebloo, E.A. Mohammed, B. Far, Deep learning approach for aggressive driving behaviour detection (2021). arXiv:2111.04794

  15. A. Noor, B. Benjdira, A. Ammar, A. Koubaa, Driftnet: aggressive driving behaviour detection using 3d convolutional neural networks, in 2020 First International Conference of Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies (SMARTTECH) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 214–219

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Zahid, Y. Chen, S. Khan, A. Jamal, M. Ijaz, T. Ahmed, Predicting risky and aggressive driving behavior among taxi drivers: do spatio-temporal attributes matter? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(11), 3937 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Wang, Adaboost for feature selection, classification and its relation with svm, a review. Phys. Proc. 25, 800–807 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A.C. Nica, M. Trsăcău, A.A. Rotaru, C. Andreescu, A. Sorici, A.M. Florea, V. Bacue, Collecting and processing a self-driving dataset in the upb campus, in 2019 22nd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 202–209

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Aksjonov, P. Nedoma, V. Vodovozov, E. Petlenkov, M. Herrmann, A novel driver performance model based on machine learning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(9), 267–272 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Wang, X. Wang, J. Han, H. Xiang, H. Li, Y. Zhang, S. Li, A recognition method of aggressive driving behavior based on ensemble learning. Sensors 22(2), 644 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Carballo, J. Lambert, A. Monrroy, D. Wong, P. Narksri, Y. Kitsukawa, E. Takeuchi, S. Kato, K. Takeda, Libre: the multiple 3d lidar dataset, in: 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1094–1101

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. Vasile, E. Tudor, I.-C. Sburlan, M.-A. Gheti, G. Popa, Experimental validation of lidar sensors used in vehicular applications by using a mobile platform for distance and speed measurements. Sensors 21(23), 8147 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.M. Martinez, M. Heucke, F.-Y. Wang, B. Gao, D. Cao, Driving style recognition for intelligent vehicle control and advanced driver assistance: a survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19(3), 666–676 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Liu, Y. Liu, D. Li, H. Wang, X. Huang, L. Song, Dsdcla: Driving style detection via hybrid cnn-lstm with multi-level attention fusion. Appl. Intell. 1–18 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. O’Shea, R. Nash, An introduction to convolutional neural networks (2015). arXiv:1511.08458

  26. S. Hochreiter, J. Schmidhuber, Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Goutte, E. Gaussier, A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and f-score, with implication for evaluation, in European Conference on Information Retrieval (Springer, 2005), pp. 345–359

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Zhang, W. Cui, N. Cui, Deep reinforcement learning based multi-objective energy management strategy for a plug-in hybrid electric bus considering driving style recognition, in 2022 6th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  29. Q. Han, X. Hu, S. He, L. Zeng, L. Ye, X. Yuan, Evaluate good bus driving behavior with lstm, in Internet of Vehicles. Technologies and Services Towards Smart City: 5th International Conference, IOV 2018, Paris, France, Nov 20–22, 2018, Proceedings, vol. 5 (Springer, 2018), pp. 122–132

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Joshi, J.A. Owens, S. Shah, T. Munasinghe, Analysis of preprocessing techniques, keras tuner, and transfer learning on cloud street image data, in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (IEEE, 2021), pp. 4165–4168

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Patel, D.S. Kushwaha, A hybrid cnn-lstm model for predicting server load in cloud computing. J. Supercomput. 78(8), 1–30 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. X. Chen, X. Xie, D. Teng, Short-term traffic flow prediction based on convlstm model, in 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 846–850

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ştefan Popescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Popescu, P.Ş., Cojocaru, I., Mihăescu, M.C. (2024). Evaluation of the Driving Behaviour Models with Newly Collected Data. In: Kolski, C., Mihăescu, M.C., Rebedea, T. (eds) AI Approaches for Designing and Evaluating Interactive Intelligent Systems. ROCHI 2022. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53957-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics