Abstract
E-participation refers to the use of digital technologies and online platforms to engage citizens and other stakeholders in democratic and government decision-making processes. Recent research work has explored the application of recommender systems to e-participation, focusing on the development of algorithmic solutions to be effective in terms of personalized content retrieval accuracy, but ignoring underlying societal issues, such as biases, fairness, privacy and transparency. Motivated by this research gap, on a public e-participatory budgeting dataset, we measure and analyze recommendation fairness metrics oriented to several minority, vulnerable and NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) groups of citizens. Our empirical results show that there is a strong popularity bias (especially for the minority groups) due to how content is presented and accessed in a reference e-participation platform; and that hybrid algorithms exploiting user geolocation information in a collaborative filtering fashion are good candidates to satisfy the proposed fairness conceptualization for the above underrepresented citizen collectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
NIMBY phenomenon: residents’ opposition to certain development projects, facilities or infrastructures that they believe could have a negative impact on their immediate surroundings.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
We discarded using the proposals’ descriptions since they entailed information noise and ambiguities on the proposals’ main topics.
- 12.
References
Al-Hassan, M., Lu, H., Lu, J.: A semantic enhanced hybrid recommendation approach: a case study of e-government tourism service recommendation system. Decis. Supp. Syst. 72, 97–109 (2015)
Barile, F., et al.: ICT solutions for the OR.C.HE.STRA project: from personalized selection to enhanced fruition of cultural heritage data. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems, pp. 501–507. IEEE (2014)
Boratto, L., Fenu, G., Marras, M.: Interplay between upsampling and regularization for provider fairness in recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 31(3), 421–455 (2021)
Cantador, I., Bellogín, A., Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Gil, O.: Personalized recommendations in e-participation: offline experiments for the ‘Decide Madrid’ platform. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Citizens, pp. 1–6. ACM (2017)
Cantador, I., Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Fernández, M.: Exploiting open data to analyze discussion and controversy in online citizen participation. Inf. Process. Manag. 57(5), 102301 (2020)
Cantador, I., Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Fernández, M., Alani, H.: What’s going on in my city? recommender systems and electronic participatory budgeting. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 219–223. ACM (2018)
Casino, F., Batista, E., Patsakis, C., Solanas, A.: Context-aware recommender for smart health. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Smart Cities Conference, pp. 1–2. IEEE (2015)
Church, J., Saunders, D., Wanke, M., Pong, R., Spooner, C., Dorgan, M.: Citizen participation in health decision-making: past experience and future prospects. J. Public Health Policy 23, 12–32 (2002)
Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Cantador, I., Gil, O.: Recommender systems for e-governance in smart cities: state of the art and research opportunities. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Citizens, pp. 1–6. ACM (2017)
Deldjoo, Y., Anelli, V.W., Zamani, H., Bellogín, A., Di Noia, T.: A flexible framework for evaluating user and item fairness in recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 31, 457–511 (2021)
Deldjoo, Y., Jannach, D., Bellogín, A., Difonzo, A., Zanzonelli, D.: Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. (2023)
Dyczkowski, K., Stachowiak, A.: A recommender system with uncertainty on the example of political elections. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2012. CCIS, vol. 298, pp. 441–449. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31715-6_47
Ekstrand, M.D., et al.: All the cool kids, how do they fit in?: popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, vol. 81, pp. 172–186. PMLR (2018)
Eranti, V.: Re-visiting NIMBY: from conflicting interests to conflicting valuations. Sociol. Rev. 65(2), 285–301 (2017)
Gunawardana, A., Shani, G.: Evaluating recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 265–308. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_8
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., Moldan, B.: Sustainable Development Goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecol. Ind. 60, 565–573 (2016)
Kavanaugh, A., Ahuja, A., Pérez-Quiñones, M., Tedesco, J., Madondo, K.: Encouraging civic participation through local news aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 172–179. ACM (2013)
Lujak, M., Billhardt, H., Dunkel, J., Fernández, A., Hermoso, R., Ossowski, S.: A distributed architecture for real-time evacuation guidance in large smart buildings. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 14(1), 257–282 (2017)
Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 10. IEEE (2004)
Macintosh, A.: E-democracy and e-participation research in Europe. In: Chen, H., et al. (eds.) Digital Government: e-Government Research, Case Studies, and Implementation, vol. 17, pp. 85–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71611-4_5
Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L., de la Rosa-Esteva, J.-L.: The representation for all model: an agent-based collaborative method for more meaningful citizen participation in urban planning. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7973, pp. 324–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_24
Nelimarkka, M., et al.: Comparing three online civic engagement platforms using the “spectrum of public participation” framework. In: Oxford Internet, Policy & Politics Conference, pp. 1–22 (2014)
Nguyen, T.T., Hui, P.M., Harper, F.M., Terveen, L., Konstan, J.A.: Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 677–686. ACM (2014)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: OECD guidelines for citizen participation processes. OECD Publishing (2022)
Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. Penguin (2011)
Peixoto, T.: Beyond theory: e-participatory budgeting and its promises for eParticipation. Eur. J. ePract. 7(5), 1–9 (2009)
Peroni, L., Timmer, A.: Vulnerable groups: the promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. Int. J. Constitut. Law 11(4), 1056–1085 (2013)
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Cantador, I., Cortés-Cediel, M.E., Gil, O.: Recommender systems for smart cities. Inf. Syst. 92, 101545 (2020)
de Sousa Santos, B.: Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy. Polit. Soc. 26(4), 461–510 (1998)
Terán, L., Meier, A.: A fuzzy recommender system for eElections. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds.) EGOVIS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6267, pp. 62–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15172-9_6
Vargas, S., Castells, P.: Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 109–116. ACM (2011)
Wang, Y., Ma, W., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Ma, S.: A survey on the fairness of recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 41(3), 1–43 (2023)
Yang, Z., Feng, J.: Explainable multi-task convolutional neural network framework for electronic petition tag recommendation. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 59, 101263 (2023)
Yavari, A., Jayaraman, P.P., Georgakopoulos, D.: Contextualised service delivery in the internet of things: parking recommender for smart cities. In: Proceedings of the 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things, pp. 454–459. IEEE (2016)
Zheng, Y., Schachter, H.L.: Explaining citizens’ e-participation use: the role of perceived advantages. Public Organ. Rev. 17, 409–428 (2017)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grant PID2019-108965GB-I00 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and Grant PID2022-139131NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alonso-Cortés, M., Cantador, I., Bellogín, A. (2024). Recommendation Fairness in eParticipation: Listening to Minority, Vulnerable and NIMBY Citizens. In: Goharian, N., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14611. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56065-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56066-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)