Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Can Innovation Systems be Sustainable? An Approach for Organizations in Times of Crises, Alongside Economic and Information Technology Issues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 502))

  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Although information technology is widely considered in innovation processes, environmental, social, and political issues are commonly neglected in times of crisis. This is especially unwelcome since these issues require scarce time and resources due to the instability and vulnerability of organizations in these times. When treated in terms of Innovation Systems (IS), these issues culminate in dedicated IS (DIS) to sustainability. This article presents the theoretical foundations of DIS through a Systematic Literature Review (RSL) based on the Templier and Paré protocol, which analyzed 44 studies. This study examines how DIS behaves to meet environmental, social, political, and economic aspects in crisis times. The results reveal a predominance of governmental institutions as protagonists in promoting IS in times of crisis. We also observed recurrent cooperation between different actors, demonstrating the importance of partnerships. Our study fosters discussion on the behavior of IS dedicated to sustainability in times of crisis and highlights the main elements of their functioning. Finally, this paper provides a research agenda for future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dahlke, J., Bogner, K., Becker, M., Schlaile, M.P., Pyka, A., Ebersberger, B.: Crisis-driven innovation and fundamental human needs: a typological framework of rapid-response COVID-19 innovations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 169, 120799 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zartha Sossa, J.W., Lopez Montoya, O.H., Acosta Prado, J.C.: Determinants of a sustainable innovation system. Bus Strategy Environ. 30(2), 1345–1356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2689

  3. Zhu, B., Nguyen, M., Siri, N.S., Malik, A.: Towards a transformative model of circular economy for SMEs. J. Bus. Res. 144, 545–555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.093

  4. Pearson, C.M., Clair, J.A.: Reframing crisis management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(1), 59–76 (1998). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.192960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oborn, E., Pilosof, N.P., Hinings, B., Zimlichman, E.: Institutional logics and innovation in times of crisis: telemedicine as digital ‘PPE.’ Inf. Organ. 31(1), 100340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., Rickne, A.: Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Res. Policy 31(2), 233–245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cassiolato, J.E., Pessoa de Matos, M.G., Lastres, H.M.M.: Innovation systems and development. Int. Develop. 566–581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671656.003.0034

  8. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S.: In search of useful public policies—key lessons and issues for policy makers, 299–315 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6133-0_11

  9. Pyka, A.: Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Market Complexity 3(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7

  10. Markard, J.: The life cycle of technological innovation systems. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 153(July 2018), 119407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045

  11. Ghazinoory, S., Nasri, S., Ameri, F., Montazer, G.A., Shayan, A.: Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’ for solving macro-level societal problems?,” Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 150(October 2018), 119749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119749

  12. Hekkert, M.P., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., Smits, R.E.H.M.: Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 74(4), 413–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, T.A., Gruber, D.A., Sutcliffe, K.M., Shepherd, D.A., Zhao, E.Y.: Organizational response to adversity: fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Acad. Manag. Ann. 11(2), 733–769 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Filho, W.L., Brandli, L.L., Salvia, A.L., Rayman-Bacchus, L., Platje, J.: COVID-19 and the UN sustainable development goals: threat to solidarity or an opportunity? Sustain. (Switz.) 12(13), 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ranjbari, M., et al.: Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: a systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 297, 126660 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ONU, “United nations general assembly. Int. J. Marine Coastal Law 25(2), 271–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1163/157180910X12665776638740

  17. Hundscheid, L., Wurzinger, M., Gühnemann, A., Melcher, A.H., Stern, T.: Rethinking meat consumption – How institutional shifts affect the sustainable protein transition. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 31, 301–312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho, J.Y., Yoon, S.: Ambiguous roles of intermediaries in social entrepreneurship: the case of social innovation system in South Korea. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121324

  19. Klerkx, L., Begemann, S.: Supporting food systems transformation: the what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agric. Syst. 184, Sep (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901

  20. Nair, R., Viswanathan, P.K., Bastian, B.L.: Reprioritising sustainable development goals in the post-covid-19 global context: will a mandatory corporatesocial responsibility regime help? Adm. Sci. 11(4) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040150

  21. Yin, X., Chen, J., Li, J.: Rural innovation system: revitalize the countryside for a sustainable development. J. Rural. Stud. 93, 471–478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernandez, R.R., Jordaan, S.M., Kaldunski, B., Kumar, N.: Aligning climate change and sustainable development goals with an innovation systems roadmap for renewable power. Front. Sustain. 1, 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2020.583090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kilkiş, Ş: Sustainability-oriented innovation system analyses of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey and Singapore. J. Clean. Prod. 130, 235–247 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis, K.: How will extension contribute to the sustainable development goals? A global strategy and operational plan. J. Int. Agric. and Exten. Educ. 23(1), 7–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2016.23101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Forrester, J.W.: Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 3(C), 1–22 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80001-X

  26. Schlaile, M.P., Urmetzer, S., Ehrenberger, M.B., Brewer, J.: Systems entrepreneurship: a conceptual substantiation of a novel entrepreneurial ‘species.’ Sustain. Sci. 16(3), 781–794 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00850-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dahlke, J., Bogner, K., Becker, M., Schlaile, M.P., Pyka, A., Ebersberger, B.: Crisis-driven innovation and fundamental human needs: a typological framework of rapid-response COVID-19 innovations. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 169 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pan, S.L., Zhang, S.: From fighting COVID-19 pandemic to tackling sustainable development goals: an opportunity for responsible information systems research. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 55(July), 102196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102196

  29. Mangas-Vega, A., Dantas, T., Sánchez-Jara, J.M., Gómez-Díaz, R.: Systematic literature reviews in social sciences and humanities a case study. J. Inf. Technol. Res. 11(1), 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2018010101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Denyer, D., Neely, A.: Introduction to special issue: innovation and productivity performance in the UK. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 5–6(3–4), 131–135 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00100.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Briner, R.B., Denyer, D.: Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management, no. November 2015 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007

  32. Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F.: The Third Mission of the university: a systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 161(March), 120284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

  33. Pinto, A.C., de Andrade, J.B.: Fator de impacto de revistas científicas: qual o significado deste parâmetro? Quim. Nova 22(3), 448–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-40421999000300026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garfield, E.: The meaning of the Impact Factor. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 3(2), 363–369 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., Sutton, A.: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 10(1), 45–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819052801804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D.: Producing a Systematic Review. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, pp. 671–689 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wesche, J.P., Negro, S.O., Dütschke, E., Raven, R.P.J.M., Hekkert, M.P.: Configurational innovation systems – Explaining the slow German heat transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 52, 99–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., Porto Gómez, I., Aguirre Larracoechea, U.: Technological diversification: a matter of related or unrelated varieties?. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 155 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119997

  39. Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Cañón-de-Francia, J.: The relevance of complementarities in the study of the economic consequences of environmental proactivity: analysis of the moderating effect of innovation efforts. Ecol. Econ. 142, 21–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kroll, H., Tagscherer, U.: Chinese regional innovation systems in times of crisis: the case of Guangdong. Asian J. Technol. Innov. 17(2), 101–128 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2009.9668675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Komninos, N., Musyck, B., Reid, A.I.: Smart specialisation strategies in south Europe during crisis. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 17(4), 448–471 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2013-0118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sampat, B.N., Shadlen, K.C.: The covid-19 innovation system. Health Aff. 40(3), 400–409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Anderson, C.R., McLachlan, S.M.: Exiting, enduring and innovating: farm household adaptation to global zoonotic disease. Glob. Environ. Chang. 22(1), 82–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2011.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Janssen, M., van der Voort, H.: Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2020.102180

  45. Lennox, J., Reuge, N., Benavides, F.: UNICEF’s lessons learned from the education response to the COVID-19 crisis and reflections on the implications for education policy. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2021.102429

  46. Park, J., Chung, E.: Learning from past pandemic governance: early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea. World Dev. 137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2020.105198

  47. Kuziemski, M., Misuraca, G.: AI governance in the public sector: three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecomm. Policy 44(6) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.101976

  48. Labunska, S., Gavkalova, N., Pylypenko, A., Prokopishyna, O.: Cognitive instruments of public management accountability for development of national innovation system|Viešojo valdymo atskaitomybės pažintiniai instrumentai kuriant nacionalinę inovacijų sistemą. Public Policy Adm. 19(3), 114–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.3.24727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ghazinoory, S., Khosravi, M., Nasri, S.: A systems-based approach to analyze environmental issues: problem-oriented innovation system for water scarcity problem in Iran. J. Environ. Dev. 30(3), 291–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965211019084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huff, T.: Malaysia’s multimedia super corridor and its first crisis of confidence. Asian J Soc Sci 30(2), 248–270 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1163/156853102320405843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Papon, P.: Research institutions in France: between the Republic of science and the nation-state in crisis. Res. Policy 27(8), 771–780 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00089-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ballantyne, P.: Accessing, sharing and communicating agricultural information for development: emerging trends and issues. Inf. Dev. 25(4), 260–271 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666909351634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bauner, D.: International private and public reinforcing dependencies for the innovation of automotive emission control systems in Japan and USA. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45(5), 375–388 (Jun.2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2010.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Brooks, S., Loevinsohn, M.: Shaping agricultural innovation systems responsive to food insecurity and climate change. Nat. Resour. Forum. 35(3), 185–200 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01396.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Hara, S., Toussaint, E.C.: Food access in crisis: food security and COVID-19. Ecolog. Econ. 180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2020.106859

  56. Stern, N., Valero, A.: Research policy, Chris Freeman special issue innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Res. Policy 50(9) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2021.104293

  57. Prosser, L., Thomas Lane, E., Jones, R.: Collaboration for innovative routes to market: COVID-19 and the food system. Agric. Syst. 188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2020.103038

  58. Binder, S., et al.: African national public health institutes responses to COVID-19: innovations, systems changes, and challenges. Health Secur. 19(5), 498–507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2021.0094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Balázs, K.: Innovation potential embodied in research organizations in Central and Eastern Europe. Soc. Stud. Sci. 25(4), 655–683 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025004004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Furlan, C., Mortarino, C.: Forecasting the impact of renewable energies in competition with non-renewable sources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1879–1886 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.05.284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Palma, I.P., Toral, J.N., Vázquez, M.R. P., Fuentes, N.F., Hernández, F.G.: Historical changes in the process of agricultural development in Cuba. J. Clean Prod. 96, 77–84 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.11.078

  62. Qureshi, T.M., Ullah, K., Arentsen, M.J.: Factors responsible for solar PV adoption at household level: a case of Lahore, Pakistan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 754–763 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Etzkowitz, H.: An innovation strategy to end the second great depression. Eur. Plan. Stud. 20(9), 1439–1453 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. S. Ghazinoory, S. Nasri, F. Ameri, G. A. Montazer, and A. Shayan, “Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’’ for solving macro-level societal problems?,’” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 150, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119749

  65. Knox, D., Castles, S.: Education with production-learning from the third world. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2(1), 1–14 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-0593(82)90062-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Chung, S.: Innovation in Korea (2003).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50062-0

  67. Stern, N., Valero, A.: Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Res. Policy 50(9), 104293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Taalbi, J.: Innovation in the long run: perspectives on technological transitions in Sweden 1908–2016. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit 40, 222–248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2021.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sharif, N.: Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept. Res. Policy 35(5), 745–766 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Trinugroho, I., Law, S.H., Lee, W.C., Wiwoho, J., Sergi, B.S.: Effect of financial development on innovation: roles of market institutions. Econ. Model 103 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2021.105598

  71. Tulum, Ö., Lazonick, W.: Financialized corporations in a national innovation system: the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Int. J. Polit. Econ. 47(3–4), 281–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2018.1549842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Friz, K., Günther, J.: Innovation and economic crisis in transition economies. Eurasian Bus. Rev. 11(4), 537–563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-021-00192-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kapetaniou, C., Samdanis, M., Lee, S.H.S.H.: Innovation policies of Cyprus during the global economic crisis: aligning financial institutions with National Innovation System. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 133, 29–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sharif, N.: An examination of recent developments in Hong Kong’s innovation system: 1990 to the present. Sci. Public Policy 33(7), 505–518 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yang, C.: Government policy change and evolution of regional innovation systems in China: evidence from strategic emerging industries in Shenzhen. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 33(3), 661–682 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1068/C12162r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Knight, P.T., Routti, J.: E-Development and consensus formation in Finland. J. Knowl. Econ. 2(1), 117–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0023-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Květoň, V., Horák, P.: The effect of public R&D subsidies on firms’ competitiveness: regional and sectoral specifics in emerging innovation systems. Appl. Geogr. 94, 119–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOG.2018.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ranga, M.: Stimulating R&D and innovation to address Romania’s Economic Crisis: a bridge too far? Eur. Plan. Stud. 20(9), 1497–1523 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Rho, S., Lee, K., Kim, S.H.S.H.: Limited catch-up in China’s semiconductor industry: a sectoral innovation system perspective. Millennial Asia 6(2), 147–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399615590514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Gkypali, A., Kokkinos, V., Bouras, C., Tsekouras, K.: Science parks and regional innovation performance in fiscal austerity era: Less is more? Small Bus. Econ. 47(2), 313–330 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Filippetti, A., Archibugi, D.: Innovation in times of crisis: national systems of innovation, structure, and demand. Res. Policy 40(2), 179–192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2010.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Khan, H.A.: Technology and economic development: the case of Taiwan. J. Contemp. China 13(40), 507–521 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1067056042000213373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kurniati, A., Rosskam, E., Afzal, M.M., Suryowinoto, T.B., Mukti, A.G.: Strengthening Indonesia’s health workforce through partnerships. Public Health 129(9), 1138–1149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUHE.2015.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M.: A trans-Keynesian vision of innovation for the contemporary economic crisis: ‘picking winners’ revisited. Sci. Public Policy 36(10), 799–808 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X481950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Greeson, J.K., Gyourko, J., Ortiz, A.J., Coleman, D., Cancel, S.: ‘One hundred and ninety-four got licensed by Monday’: application of design thinking for foster care innovation and transformation in Rhode Island. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2021.106166

  86. Sourdin, T., Li, B., McNamara, D.M.: Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy Technol. 9(4), 447–453 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HLPT.2020.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Caniato, M., Carliez, D., Thulstrup, A.: Challenges and opportunities of new energy schemes for food security in humanitarian contexts: a selective review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 22, 208–219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2017.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Schlaile et al., M.P.: Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustain. (Switz.) 9(12) (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253

  89. Urmetzer, S., Schlaile, M.P., Bogner, K.B., Mueller, M., Pyka, A.: Exploring the dedicated knowledge base of a transformation towards a sustainable bioeconomy. Sustain. (Switz.) 10(6), 16–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Bardin, L.: Análise de Conteúdo (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil

    Rafael Antunes Fidelis, Antonio Carlos dos Santos, Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo, Diogo Bernardino de Oliveira Lima Bezerra & Rafael Barreiros Porto

Authors
  1. Rafael Antunes Fidelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Carlos dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diogo Bernardino de Oliveira Lima Bezerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rafael Barreiros Porto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. British University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Maria Papadaki

  2. University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Marinos Themistocleous

  3. British University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Khalid Al Marri

  4. Dubai Blockchain Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Marwan Al Zarouni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fidelis, R.A., dos Santos, A.C., de Souza Bermejo, P.H., de Oliveira Lima Bezerra, D.B., Porto, R.B. (2024). How Can Innovation Systems be Sustainable? An Approach for Organizations in Times of Crises, Alongside Economic and Information Technology Issues. In: Papadaki, M., Themistocleous, M., Al Marri, K., Al Zarouni, M. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 502. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56481-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56481-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56480-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56481-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation