Skip to main content

Opportunities and Limitations of AI in Human-Centered Design a Research Preview

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2024)

Abstract

[Context and motivation] AI has significantly increased its capabilities and popularity since the emergence of Large Language Models. Generative AI, in particular, shows potential to support a variety of RE activities. [Question/problem] While the opportunities of AI in RE are being discussed, there is little reflection on the limitations and concerns regarding the use of AI. Moreover, holistic investigations of these aspects within the software engineering lifecycle are sparse. [Principal ideas/results] We propose a research agenda that aims to systematically investigate the potential of AI within a human-centered design (HCD) process to derive meaningful application scenarios and recommendations for AI. [Contribution] In this research preview, we share initial results of workshop sessions conducted with RE and UX experts to determine opportunities and limitations of AI within the HCD process and provide insights into ongoing research activities on the example of “persona agents”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalpiaz, F., Niu, N.: Requirements engineering in the days of artificial intelligence. IEEE Softw. 37(4), 7–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.2986047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao, L., et al.: Natural language processing for requirements engineering: a systematic mapping study. ACM Comput. Surv. 54(3), 1–41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3444689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, K., Reddivari, S., Reddivari, K.: Artificial intelligence in software requirements engineering: state-of-the-art. In: IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI), San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 106–111 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma, S., Pandey, S.K.: Integrating AI techniques in requirements elicitation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advancements in Computing & Management (ICACM) 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3462954

  5. Lim, S., Henriksson, A., Zdravkovic, J.: Data-driven requirements elicitation: a systematic literature review. SN Comput. Sci. 2(1) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00416-4

  6. Lunarejo, M.I.L.: Requirements prioritization based on multiple criteria using artificial intelligence techniques. In IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), Notre Dame, IN, USA, pp. 480–485 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qayyum, S., Qureshi, A.: A survey on machine learning based requirement prioritization techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems, Phuket Thailand, pp. 51–55 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes, J.H., Payne, J., Leppelmeier, M.: Toward improved artificial intelligence in requirements engineering: metadata for tracing datasets. In: IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), Jeju Island, Korea (South), pp. 256–262 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sinpang, J.S., Sulaiman, S., Idris, N.: Detecting ambiguity in requirements analysis using mamdani fuzzy inference. J. Telecommun. Electr. Comput. Eng. (JTEC) 9, (3–4), 157–162 (2017). https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/2936

  10. Arora, C., Grundy, J., Abdelrazek, M.: Advancing requirements engineering through generative AI: assessing the role of LLMs (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13976

  11. White, J., Hays, S., Fu, Q., Spencer-Smith, J., Schmidt, D.C.: ChatGPT prompt patterns for improving code quality, refactoring, requirements elicitation, and software design (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07839

  12. Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Niu, N., Wang, Y., Liu, C.: Empirical evaluation of ChatGPT on requirements information retrieval under zero-shot setting (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.12562

  13. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241–210:2019 Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Standard (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karolita, D., McIntosh, J., Kanij, T., Grundy, J., Obie, H.O.: Use of personas in requirements engineering: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 162, 107264 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, W.: AI in HCI Design and User Experience (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00987

  16. Emmanuel, G.S., Polito, F.: How related are designers to the personas they create? In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A., Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Practice in Contemporary and Emerging Technologies. Springer International Publishing, pp. 3–13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05906-3_1

  17. Salminen, J., Jansen, B.J., An, J., Kwak, H., Jung, S.-G.: Are personas done? Evaluating their usefulness in the age of digital analytics. Persona Stud. 4(2), 47–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2018vol4no2art737

  18. Salminen, J., Guan, K., Jung, S.-G., Jansen, B.J.: A survey of 15 years of data-driven persona development. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 37(18), 1685–1708 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1908670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, J.S., O'Brien, J.C., Cai, C.J., Morris, M.R., Liang, P., Bernstein, M.S.: Generative agents: interactive simulacra of human behavior (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03442

  20. Zhang, X., et al.: PersonaGen: a tool for generating personas from user feedback (2023). http://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.00390v2

  21. Kocaballi, A.B.: Conversational AI-Powered Design: ChatGPT as designer, user, and product (2023). http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.07406v1

  22. Qian, C., et al.: Communicative agents for software development (2023). http://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.07924v4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Hess .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hess, A., Immich, T., Tamanini, J., Biedenbach, M., Koch, M. (2024). Opportunities and Limitations of AI in Human-Centered Design a Research Preview. In: Mendez, D., Moreira, A. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14588. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57327-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57327-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57326-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57327-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics