Skip to main content

An Exploratory Study to Identify Research Interests and Analysis Approaches in German Art History with a Potential for Digital Support

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win (iConference 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((volume 14597))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative analysis of scholarly abstracts from art history. The abstracts support insight into current research interests and analysis approaches for the discipline. Digital humanities is involved in creating technology for art historical research; with the growing amount of digitized data available, research without any technological support becomes almost impossible. There are many research scenarios in art history which can benefit from technological advancements. Libraries, archives, and museums are the institutions that develop and adapt their platforms, features, and data to ensure the needs and requirements of scholars are met. A list of research approaches and steps is a good starting point to see where developments can be helpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Näslund Dahlgren, A., Wasielewski, A.: Cultures of digitization: a historiographic perspective on digital art history. Vis. Resour. 36(4), 339–359 (2021).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2021.1928864

  2. Rodriguez-Ortega, N.: Digital art history: the questions that need to be asked. Vis. Resour. 35(1–2), 6–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2019.1553832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Drucker, J.: Is there a “digital” art history? Vis. Resour. 29(1–2), 5–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2013.761106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barni, M., Pelagotti, A., Piva, A.: Image processing for the analysis and conservation of paintings: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 22(5), 141–144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2005.1511835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Boer, J.V.A.: Infrared reflectography: a method for the examination of paintings. Appl. Opt. 7(9), 1711–1714 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.7.001711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinemann, C.: Evaluation der Streifenprojektion zur Zustandsanalyse und zum Monitoring von Veränderungsprozessen bei Gemälden. (2023). https://doi.org/10.11588/artdok.00008137

  7. Pouli, P., et al.: Recent studies of laser science in paintings conservation and research. Acc. Chem. Res. 43(6), 771–781 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900224n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moran, T.C., et al.: The roles of X rays and other types of electromagnetic radiation in evaluating paintings for forgery and restoration. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging 5, 38–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2016.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zujovic, J., et al.: Classifying paintings by artistic genre: an analysis of features & classifiers. In: 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. IEEE (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2009.5293271

  10. Madhu, P., et al.: Recognizing characters in art history using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Structuring and Understanding of Multimedia heritAge Contents. (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3347317.3357242

  11. Surapaneni, S.,  Syed, S., Lee, L.Y.: Exploring themes and bias in art using machine learning image analysis. In: 2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). IEEE (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106656

  12. Castellano, G., Vessio, G.: Deep learning approaches to pattern extraction and recognition in paintings and drawings: an overview. Neural Comput. Appl. 33(19), 12263–12282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05893-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sigaki, H.Y., Perc, M., Ribeiro, H.V.: History of art paintings through the lens of entropy and complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(37), E8585–E8594 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800083115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, S., et al.: Novel features for art movement classification of portrait paintings. Image Vis. Comput. 108, 104121 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seguin, B., Striolo, C., diLenardo, I., Kaplan, F.: Visual link retrieval in a database of paintings. In: Hua, G., Jégou, H. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9913, pp. 753–767. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46604-0_52

  16. Li, J., Wang, J.Z.: Studying digital imagery of ancient paintings by mixtures of stochastic models. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(3), 340–353 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.821349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, R.P., et al.: Authenticating Pollock paintings using fractal geometry. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 28(6), 695–702 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2006.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Milani, F., Fraternali, P.: A dataset and a convolutional model for iconography classification in paintings. J. Comput. Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 14(4), 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3458885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenberg, R., Klein, C.: The moving eye of the beholder: eye tracking and the perception of paintings (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670000.003.0005

  20. Amirshahi, S.A., Hayn-Leichsenring, G.U., Denzler, J., Redies, C.: Jenaesthetics subjective dataset: analyzing paintings by subjective scores. In: Agapito, L., Bronstein, M.M., Rother, C. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8925, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16178-5_1

  21. Amirshahi, S.A., et al.: Evaluating the rule of thirds in photographs and paintings. Art & Perception 2(1–2), 163–182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Münster, S.,  Friedrichs, K., Hegel, W.: 3D Reconstruction Techniques as a Cultural Shift in Art History? Inter. J. Digital Art History: Issue 3, 2018: Digital Space and Architect. 3,  39 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Porras, S.: Keeping our eyes open: Visualizing networks and art history. Artl@ s Bull. 6(3), 3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hutson, J. and T. Olsen, Digital humanities and virtual reality: a review of theories and best practices for art history. Inter. J. Technol. Educ. (IJTE) 4(3), 491–500 (2021).  https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.150

  25. Panciroli, C., Macauda, A., Russo, V.:  Educating about art by augmented reality: new didactic mediation perspectives at school and in museums. In: Proceedings, MDPI (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1091107

  26. Krö, C.: German art history students’ use of digital repositories: an insight. In: Toeppe, K., Yan, H., Chu, S.K.W. (eds.) iConference 2021. LNCS, vol. 12646, pp. 176–192. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71305-8_14

  27. Tagungsband, XXXV. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag: Göttingen - Zu den Dingen! Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag. In: Kirschbaum, C., Gaeta, M. (eds.), Bonn: Verband Deutscher Kunsthistoriker e.V., vol. 35 (2019).  https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/6644/

  28. Tagungsband XXXI. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag, Würzburg - Genius Loci. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag. In:  Gaeta, M., Kleines, C. (eds.)  Bonn: Verband Deutscher Kunsthistoriker e., vol. 31 (2011). https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/2105/

  29. Tagungsband XXXII. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag, Greifwald - Ohne Grenzen. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag. In:  Gaeta, M. (ed.)  Bonn: Verband Deutscher Kunsthistoriker e.V., vol. 32. (2013)  https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/2762/

  30. Tagungsband, XXXIII. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag, Mainz - Der Wert der Kunst. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag. In: Gaeta,  M., Kirschbaum, C. (eds.)  Bonn: Verband Deutscher Kunsthistoriker e.V., vol. 33 (2015).  https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/3303/

  31. Tagungsband, XXXIV. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag, Dresden - Kunst lokar - Kunst global. In: Kunsthistorikertag, D., Kirschbaum, C. (eds.) Bonn: Verband Deutscher Kunsthistorik e.V., vol. 34 (2017). https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/5245/

  32. Tagungsband, XXXVI. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag, Stuttgart - Form Fragen. Deutscher Kunsthistorikertag, ed. M. Gaeta and C. Kirschbaum. Vol. 36. 2022, Bonn: Verband Deutscher Kunsthistoriker e.V. Available from: https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/7909/

  33. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

  34. Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S.:  Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Springer (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8

  35. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T.: Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15(3), 398–405 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aronson, J.: A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qualitative Report 2(1), 1–3 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1995.2069

  37. Saldaña, J.: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, H., et al.:  QualiGPT: GPT as an easy-to-use tool for qualitative coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07061, (2023).  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.07061

  39. Gamieldien, Y., Case, J.M., Katz, A.: Advancing Qualitative Analysis: An Exploration of the Potential of Generative AI and NLP in Thematic Coding. Available at SSRN 4487768 (2023).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4487768

  40. Bruschke, J., et al.: Towards querying multimodal annotations using graphs. In: Workshop on Research and Education in Urban History in the Age of Digital Libraries. Springer (2023).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38871-2_16

  41. Kamposiori, C.: The role of Research Libraries in the creation, archiving, curation, and preservation of tools for the Digital Humanities, pp. 1–38. Research Libraries UK  (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mattmann, B., Regenass, N.: Eine neue Form der Recherche in Bibliotheken. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 45(2), 304–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2021-0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liang, S., He, D., Wu, D., Hu, H.: Challenges and opportunities of acm digital library: a preliminary survey on different users. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K.I. (eds.) iConference 2020. LNCS, vol. 12051, pp. 278–287. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_22

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research upon which this paper is based is part of the research project HistKI (History Infrastructure applying AI), which has received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under grant identifier 01UG2120A.

Disclosure of Interests.

The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy Kröber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kröber, C. (2024). An Exploratory Study to Identify Research Interests and Analysis Approaches in German Art History with a Potential for Digital Support. In: Sserwanga, I., et al. Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57860-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57860-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57859-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57860-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics