Skip to main content

Exploring Media Framing of the Monkeypox Pandemic in Mainstream and Social Media: A Framing Theory Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win (iConference 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((volume 14598))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

This study investigates the application of framing theory in the context of media coverage of the monkeypox outbreak, analyzing the divergent approaches adopted by mainstream and social media. Utilizing six framing models, the research methodically examined a corpus of 100 media items, comprising news articles and social media posts, collected from January to December 2022. The content was categorized under four principal themes: symptoms and transmission, prevention and treatment, public opinion and attitudes, and social strategies. The analysis elucidated a notable differentiation in framing preferences. Mainstream media predominantly utilized ‘Framing of Situations’ and ‘Framing of Attributes,’ denoting a tendency towards narrative and descriptive reporting. In contrast, social media exhibited a proclivity for ‘Framing of Actions’ and ‘Framing of Issues,’ reflective of an interactive and dynamic communicative style. A Chi-square statistical analysis yielded a significant association between the types of media and the employed framing models (Chi-square = 25.38, p < 0.0001). The computed Cramér's V value of 0.316 indicated a moderate degree of association, suggesting nuanced variances in framing strategies between mainstream and social media. This study contributes to the scholarly understanding of media framing in the milieu of a global health crisis. The findings underscore the distinct ways in which different media platforms engage audiences and shape public perceptions during health emergencies. These insights are instrumental for the formulation of effective public health communication strategies, highlighting the pivotal role of media framing in the dissemination and reception of health-related information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mpox in the U.S., https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/symptoms/index.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2023

  2. Entman, R.M.: Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C.H.: News Framing Effects, 1st edn. Routledge, London (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Guenther, L., et al.: Framing as a concept for health communication: a systematic review. Health Commun. 36(7), 891–899 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D'angelo, P.: Framing Theory and Journalism. 1–10 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bullock, O.M., Shulman, H.C.: Utilizing framing theory to design more effective health messages about tanning behavior among college women. 72(3), 319–332 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hallahan, K.: Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations. 11(3), 205–242 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bao, H., et al.: Digital Media’s Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic. 8(9), e20156 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olagoke, A.A., et al.: Exposure to coronavirus news on mainstream media: the role of risk perceptions and depression. Br. J. Health Psychol. 25(4), 865–874 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Widmann, T.: Fear, Hope, and COVID‐19: emotional elite rhetoric and its impact on the public during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. 43(5), 827–850 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schnell, F., et al.: Ageism and perceptions of vulnerability: framing of age during the Covid-19 pandemic. Innov. Aging 8(2), 170–177 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barnes, K., Colagiuri, B.: Positive attribute framing increases COVID-19 booster vaccine intention for unfamiliar vaccines. 10(6), 962 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dobrowolski, Z.: The strategy of vaccination and global pandemic: how framing may thrive on strategy during and after Covid-19. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 24(1), 532–541 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolsen, T., et al.: Framing the Origins of COVID-19. Sci. Commun. 42(5), 562–585 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020953603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hameleers, M.: Prospect theory in times of a pandemic: the effects of gain versus loss framing on risky choices and emotional responses during the 2020 coronavirus outbreak - evidence from the US and the Netherlands. Mass Commun. Soc. 24(4), 479–499 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gamson, W.A.: Hiroshima, the holocaust, and the politics of exclusion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60(1), 1–20 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogbodo, J., et al.: Communicating health crisis: a content analysis of global media framing of COVID-19. Health Promot. Perspect. 10(3), 257–269 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, H., et al.: A content analysis of Chinese news coverage on COVID-19 and tourism. Curr. Issues Tourism 25(2), 198–205 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mutua, S.N., Ong'ong'a, D.O.: Online News Media Framing of COVID-19 Pandemic: Probing the Initial Phases of the Disease Outbreak in International Media. 1(2), e02006 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ali, S.M.A., Sherman-Morris, K.: Pandemic and health reporting: a content analysis of New York times coverage of COVID-19 from January 01, 2020, to August 31, 2022. Soc. Sci. Hum. Open 8(1), 100739 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barnes, M.D., et al.: Analysis of media agenda setting during and after Hurricane Katrina: implications for emergency preparedness, disaster response, and disaster policy. Am. J. Public Health 98(4), 604–610 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hussain, A., et al.: Artificial intelligence–enabled analysis of public attitudes on Facebook and twitter toward COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: observational study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23(4), e26627 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/26627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malik, A., et al.: Public health agencies outreach through Instagram during the COVID-19 pandemic: crisis and emergency risk communication perspective. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 61, 1–9 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laws, R.L., et al.: Symptoms and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among children - Utah and Wisconsin, March-May 2020. Pediatrics 147(1), 1–15 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, Y., et al.: Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7(373), 1–22 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meo, S.A. et al.: Public perceptions of the emerging human monkeypox disease and vaccination in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. 10(9), 1534 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silva, P.C.L. et al.: COVID-ABS: an agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions. Chaos, Solitons Fract. 139, 110088 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gamson, W.A., Modigliani, A.: Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am. J. Sociol. 95(1), 1–37 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Girum, T., et al.: Optimal strategies for COVID-19 prevention from global evidence achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown: a systematic review. Arch. Public Health 79, 150 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. As Fauci warns monkeypox needs to be taken more seriously, former FDA commissioner says the window to control it ‘probably has closed’. https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/17/health/monkeypox-cases-undercounted-fauci/index.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2022

  31. What is monkeypox, and how can you stay safe as it spreads? https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/14/health/monkeypox-questions-update/index.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2022

  32. Deshmukh, P., et al.: Monkeypox: what do we know so far? A short narrative review of literature. J. Assoc. Phys. India 70(7), 87–90 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Webb, E.M., et al.: Availability, scope, and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: a systematic review. BMJ Glob. Health 7(8), e009838 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tusabe, F., et al.: Lessons Learned from the Ebola Virus Disease and COVID-19 Preparedness to Respond to the Human Monkeypox Virus Outbreak in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Infect. Drug Resist. 15, 6279–6286 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar, N. et al.: The 2022 outbreak and the pathobiology of the monkeypox virus. 131, 102855 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lazard, A.J., Scheinfeld, E., Bernhardt, J.M., Wilcox, G.B., Suran, M.: Detecting themes of public concern: a text mining analysis of the centers for disease control and prevention’s Ebola live Twitter chat. Am. J. Infect. Control 43(10), 1109–1111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wicke, P., Bolognesi, M.M.: Framing COVID-19: how we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE 15(9), e0240010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ophir, Y., et al.: The framing of COVID-19 in Italian media and its relationship with community mobility: a mixed-method approach. J. Health Commun. 26(3), 161–173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1899344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Boot, A.B., Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R.A.: Correction: the processing and evaluation of news content on social media is influenced by peer-user commentary. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8(1), 209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00901-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Porat, T., et al.: Public health and risk communication during COVID-19-enhancing psychological needs to promote sustainable behavior change. 8, 1–15 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Framing of the Covid-19 pandemic and its organizational predictors. 50, 91–112 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nwakpu, E.S., Ezema, V.O., Ogbodo, J.N.: Nigeria media framing of coronavirus pandemic and audience response. Health Promot. Perspect. 10(3), 192–199 (2020). https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2020.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bahtar, A.Z., Muda, M.: The impact of user – generated content (UGC) on product reviews towards online purchasing – a conceptual framework. Procedia Econ. Finance 37, 337–342 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van Ruler, B.: Communication theory: an underrated pillar on which strategic communication rests. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 12(4), 367–381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gao, R., et al.: The effects of health behaviours and beliefs based on message framing among patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open 12(1), e055329 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mohammed, F., Al-Kumaim, N.H., Alzahrani, A.I., Fazea, Y.: The impact of social media shared health content on protective behavior against COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20(3), 1775 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031775

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yang, L. (2024). Exploring Media Framing of the Monkeypox Pandemic in Mainstream and Social Media: A Framing Theory Analysis. In: Sserwanga, I., et al. Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14598. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57867-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57867-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57867-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics