Skip to main content

DUXAIT NG: A Software for the Planning and Execution of User Experience Evaluations and Experiments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI-COLLAB 2023)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, conducting UX evaluations was difficult, increasing the pressure to develop usable software. For this objective, different methods and tools for the evaluation of usability were delivered, but no clear process or method to use in a determinate context was found in the literature. In that sense, previous studies showed interest in a formal process to conduct Usability evaluations. First, a formal process to conduct Heuristic Evaluation was proposed by Lecaros, A. followed by the process to conduct Tree Testing, proposed by Tapia A., both proposals were integrated into a process to conduct generic UX evaluations. In this study, we developed a software tool that supports the integrated process previously proposed by the authors, DUXAIT-NG, which is an academic software for usability and User Experience Evaluation. This tool is intended to support the evaluation process, from gathering the participants to performing the evaluation and interpreting the results.

DUXAIT NG is capable of handling different types of UX Evaluation and Testing methods. This software allows us to perform complete usability testing, not only the stage of design or planning, which was the problem evidenced in the literature with other software used in the Usability area. The first approach was software that supported a formal process for the Heuristic Evaluation, continued by another software for Tree Testing. As a team, we decided to develop a more general software to create a standard and support a unified process that allows the researchers to conduct any usability evaluation focused in a collaborative and remote environment. The first version is available on www.duxait-ng.net.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Munim, K.M., Islam, I., Khatun, M., Karim, M.M., Islam, M.N.: Towards developing a tool for UX evaluation using facial expression. In: 2017 3rd International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT), pp. 1–6. Khulna, Bangladesh (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/EICT.2017.8275227

  2. Pinto Corredor, J.D., Agredo Delgado, V., Collazos, C.A.: Construyendo una guía para la evaluación de la usabilidad en EVAs. Campus Virtuales, 7(2), 93–104 (2018). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6681861

  3. Paz, F., Lecaros, A., Falconi, F., Tapia, A., Aguirre, J., Moquillaza, A.: A process to support heuristic evaluation and tree testing from a UX integrated perspective. In: Latifi, S. (eds) ITNG 2023. AISC, vol. 1445, pp. 369–377. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28332-1_42

  4. Ferre, X., Bevan, N.: Usability planner: a tool to support the process of selecting usability methods. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 652–655. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lecaros, A., Moquillaza, A., Falconi, F., Aguirre, J., Tapia, A., Paz, F.: Selection and modeling of a formal heuristic evaluation process through comparative analysis. In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A. (eds.) Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research, Design, and Assessment. HCII 2022 LNCS, vol. 13321, pp. 28–46. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05897-4_3

  6. Tapia, A., Moquillaza, A., Aguirre, J., Falconi, F., Lecaros, A., Paz, F.: A process to support the remote tree testing technique for evaluating the information architecture of user interfaces in software projects. In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A. (eds.) Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research, Design, and Assessment. HCII 2022. LNCS, vol. 13321, pp. 75–92. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05897-4_6

  7. Paz, F., Paz, F.A., Pow-Sang, J.A., Collazos, C.: A formal protocol to conduct usability heuristic evaluations in the context of the software development process. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7, 10–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14419/IJET.V7I2.28.12874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonastre, L., Granollers, T.: A set of heuristics for user experience evaluation in e-commerce websites. In: International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction (2014). https://www.thinkmind.org/articles/achi_2014_2_10_20126.pdf

  9. Granollers, T.: Experimental validation of a set of heuristics for user experience evaluations in e-commerce websites. 2016 IEEE 11th Colombian Computing Conference, CCC 2016 - Conference Proceedings. 27–34 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/COLUMBIANCC.2016.7750783

  10. Laubheimer, P.: Tree testing: fast, iterative evaluation of menu labels and categories (2023). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tree-testing/

  11. Borisova, L.: How startups should evaluate their websites’ UX? Comparison of UX evaluation methods through evaluation of UX of the prototype of a matching platform for the rental housing market in Finland – Sopia. Master’s thesis, Aalto University School of Business. International Design Business Management (2019). https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/42377?locale-attribute=en

  12. Castro, J.W., Garnica, I., Rojas, L.A.: Automated tools for usability evaluation: a systematic mapping study. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact. HCII 2022. LNCS, vol. 13315, pp. 28–46. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_3

  13. Liu, Z., Chen, C., Wang, J., Huang, Y., Hu, J., Wang, Q.: Owl eyes: spotting UI display issues via visual understanding. In: Proceedings - 2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2020, pp. 398–409 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3324884.3416547

  14. Lecaros, A.: Implementación de una aplicación web de soporte al proceso formal de evaluaciones heurísticas. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Departamento de Ingeniería (2022). https://tesis.pucp.edu.pe/repositorio/handle/20.500.12404/22388

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the research project “Virtualización del proceso de evaluación de experiencia de usuario de productos de software para escenarios de no presencialidad” (virtualization of the user experience evaluation process of software products for non-presential scenarios), developed by HCI-DUXAIT research group. HCI-DUXAIT is a research group that belongs to the PUCP (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú). This work was funded by the Dirección de Fomento a la Investigación at the PUCP through grant 2021-C-0023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Aguirre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aguirre, J., Lecaros, A., Ramos, C., Falconi, F., Moquillaza, A., Paz, F. (2024). DUXAIT NG: A Software for the Planning and Execution of User Experience Evaluations and Experiments. In: Ruiz, P.H., Agredo-Delgado, V., Mon, A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCI-COLLAB 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57982-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics