Skip to main content

That’s All Folks: A KG of Values as Commonsense Social Norms and Behaviors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Value Engineering in Artificial Intelligence (VALE 2023)

Abstract

Values, as intended in ethics, determine the shape and validity of moral and social norms, grounding our everyday individual and community behavior on commonsense knowledge. Formalising latent moral content in human interaction is an appealing perspective that would enable a deeper understanding of both social dynamics and individual cognitive and behavioral dimension. To tackle this problem, several theoretical frameworks offer different values models, and organize them into different taxonomies. The problem of the most used theories is that they adopt a cultural-independent perspective while many entities that are considered “values” are grounded in commonsense knowledge and expressed in everyday life interaction. We propose here two ontological modules, FOLK, an ontology for values intended in their broad sense, and That’s All Folks, a module for lexical and factual folk value triggers, whose purpose is to complement the main theories, providing a method for identifying the values that are not contemplated by the major value theories, but which nonetheless play a key role in daily human interactions, and shape social structures, cultural biases, and personal beliefs. The resource is tested via performing automatic detection of values from text with a frame-based approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://etna.istc.cnr.it/framester2/sparql.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/StenDoipanni/ValueNet/tree/main/ThatsAllFolks.

  3. 3.

    Here you can find the QUOKKA GitHub repository: https://github.com/StenDoipanni/QUOKKA.

  4. 4.

    The Framester endpoint is available at http://etna.istc.cnr.it/framester2/sparql.

  5. 5.

    All the URLs of the online resources used to gather the complete list of Folk Values are available here: https://github.com/StenDoipanni/ValueNet/blob/main/ThatsAllFolks/URLs.txt.

  6. 6.

    It is possible to test a beta version of the value detector available online here: http://framester.istc.cnr.it/semanticdetection/values, this version uses only triggers from MFT module, but the full frame-based value detector tool will be released with the camera ready.

  7. 7.

    All the graphs generated by FRED and labeled with the value detector are available on the TAF repository: https://github.com/StenDoipanni/ValueNet/tree/main/ThatsAllFolks/MFRC_1k_graphs.

  8. 8.

    The full graph is available here: https://github.com/StenDoipanni/ValueNet/blob/main/ThatsAllFolks/eswc_thin_folk.png.

References

  1. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Curry, O.S., Alfano, M., Brandt, M.J., Pelican, C.: Moral molecules: morality as a combinatorial system. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 1–20 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Giorgis, S., Gangemi, A., Damiano, R.: Basic human values and moral foundations theory in ValueNet ontology. In: Corcho, O., Hollink, L., Kutz, O., Troquard, N., Ekaputra, F.J. (eds.) EKAW 2022. LNCS, vol. 13514, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_1

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Giorgis, S., Gangemi, A., Gromann, D.: Imageschemanet: formalizing embodied commonsense knowledge providing an imageschematic layer to framester. Semant. Web J. (2022, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fillmore, C.J.: Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in the Morning Calm, pp. 111–138. Hanshin, Seoul (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gangemi, A.: Closing the loop between knowledge patterns in cognition and the semantic web. Semant. Web 11(1), 139–151 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gangemi, A., Alam, M., Asprino, L., Presutti, V., Recupero, D.R.: Framester: a wide coverage linguistic linked data hub. In: Blomqvist, E., Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., Vitali, F. (eds.) EKAW 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10024, pp. 239–254. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A.: Sweetening wordnet with dolce. AI Mag. 24(3), 13 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gangemi, A., Presutti, V., Alam, M.: Amnestic forgery: an ontology of conceptual metaphors. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, FOIS 2018, Cape Town, South Africa, 19–21 September 2018. IOS Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gangemi, A., Presutti, V., Reforgiato Recupero, D., Nuzzolese, A.G., Draicchio, F., Mongiovì, M.: Semantic web machine reading with FRED. Semant. Web 8(6), 873–893 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giménez, A.C., Tamajón, L.G.: Analysis of the third-order structuring of shalom Schwartz’s theory of basic human values. Heliyon 5(6), e01797 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graham, J., et al.: Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 55–130. Elsevier (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B.A.: Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96(5), 1029 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graham, J., Nosek, B.A., Haidt, J.: The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE 7(12), e50092 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Graham, J., Nosek, B.A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Ditto, P.H.: Mapping the moral domain. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101(2), 366 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haidt, J.: The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316(5827), 998–1002 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haidt, J.: The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hopp, F.R., Fisher, J.T., Cornell, D., Huskey, R., Weber, R.: The extended moral foundations dictionary (EMFD): development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text. Behav. Res. Methods 53(1), 232–246 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mahapatra, M., Park, L.: Divinity and the “big three” explanations of suffering. Morality Health 119 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: BabelNet: building a very large multilingual semantic network. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 216–225 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nuzzolese, A.G., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Gathering lexical linked data and knowledge patterns from framenet. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 41–48. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schuler, K.K.: VerbNet: a broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. University of Pennsylvania (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 1–65. Elsevier (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings Psychol. Cult. 2(1), 2307–0919 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz, S.H., et al.: Refining the theory of basic individual values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103(4), 663 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., Owens, V.: Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32(5), 519–542 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shweder, R.A., Much, N.C., Mahapatra, M., Park, L.: The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In: Morality and Health, pp. 119–169. Routledge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: YAGO: a core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 697–706 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Trager, J., et al.: The moral foundations reddit corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05545 (2022)

  31. Yang, F.: The differences and similarities of different philosophers on tackling the trolley dilemma. In: 2021 International Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2021), pp. 722–726. Atlantis Press (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the Italian PNRR MUR project PE0000013-FAIR: Future of Artificial Intelligence Research, and the SPICE EU H2020 Project 870811 within the program: SOCIETAL CHALLENGES - Europe In A Changing World - Inclusive, Innovative And Reflective Societies for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano De Giorgis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Giorgis, S., Gangemi, A. (2024). That’s All Folks: A KG of Values as Commonsense Social Norms and Behaviors. In: Osman, N., Steels, L. (eds) Value Engineering in Artificial Intelligence. VALE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14520. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58202-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58202-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-58204-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-58202-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics