Skip to main content

A Comparison of PID Controller Architectures Applied in Autonomous UAV Follow up of UGV

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robot 2023: Sixth Iberian Robotics Conference (ROBOT 2023)

Abstract

The cooperation between Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) has brought new perspectives and effectiveness to production and monitoring processes. In this sense, tracking moving targets in heterogeneous systems involves coordination, formation, and positioning systems between UGVs and UAVs. This article presents a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) control strategy for tracking moving target operations, considering an operating environment between a multirotor UAV and an indoor UGV. Different PID architectures are developed and compared to each other in the Gazebo simulator, whose objective is to analyze the control performance of the UAV when used to track the ground robot based on the identification of the ArUco fiducial marker. Computer vision techniques based on the Robot Operating System (ROS) are integrated into the UAV’s tracking system to provide a visual reference for the aircraft’s navigation system. The results of this study indicate that the PD, Cascade, and Parallel controllers showed similar performance in both trajectories tested, with the Parallel controller showing a slight advantage in terms of mean error and standard deviation, suggesting its suitability for applications that prioritize precision and stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabryel S Ramos, Milena F Pinto, Fabricio O Coelho, Leonardo M Honório, and Diego B Haddad. Hybrid methodology based on computational vision and sensor fusion for assisting autonomous uav on offshore messenger cable transfer operation. Robotica, 40(8):2786–2814, 2022

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guido S Berger, Marco Teixeira, Alvaro Cantieri, José Lima, Ana I Pereira, António Valente, Gabriel GR de Castro, and Milena F Pinto. Cooperative heterogeneous robots for autonomous insects trap monitoring system in a precision agriculture scenario. Agriculture, 13(2):239, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ding, Y., Xin, B., Chen, J.: A review of recent advances in coordination between unmanned aerial and ground vehicles. Unmanned Systems 9(02), 97–117 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marek Nowakowski and Jakub Kurylo. Usability of perception sensors to determine the obstacles of unmanned ground vehicles operating in off-road environments. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 2023

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashok Kumar Sivarathri, Amit Shukla, and Ayush Gupta. Kinematic modes of vision-based heterogeneous uav-agv system. Array, 17:100269, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  6. Victor Massague Respall, Sami Sellami, and Ilya Afanasyev. Implementation of autonomous visual detection, tracking and landing for ar. drone 2.0 quadcopter. In 2019 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), pages 477–482. IEEE, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodrigues, G., Caldas, R., Araujo, G., de Moraes, V., Rodrigues, G., Pelliccione, P.: An architecture for mission coordination of heterogeneous robots. J. Syst. Softw. 191, 111363 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fabrício O Coelho, João P Carvalho, Milena F Pinto, and André L Marcato. Ekf and computer vision for mobile robot localization. In 2018 13th APCA International Conference on Automatic Control and Soft Computing (CONTROLO), pages 148–153. IEEE, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  9. Igor Lebedev, Aleksei Erashov, and Aleksandra Shabanova. Accurate autonomous uav landing using vision-based detection of aruco-marker. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Robotics, pages 179–188. Springer, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murat Ekici, Ahmet Çağdaş Seçkin, Ahmet Özek, and Ceyhun Karpuz. Warehouse drone: Indoor positioning and product counter with virtual fiducial markers. Drones, 7(1):3, 2022

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nobuaki Aoki and Genya Ishigami. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for real-time autonomous tracking and landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle. In 2023 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jurado-Rodríguez, D., Muñoz-Salinas, R., Garrido-Jurado, S., Medina-Carnicer, R.: Design, detection, and tracking of customized fiducial markers. IEEE Access 9, 140066–140078 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalaitzakis, M., Cain, B., Carroll, S., Ambrosi, A., Whitehead, C., Vitzilaios, N.: Fiducial markers for pose estimation: Overview, applications and experimental comparison of the artag, apriltag, aruco and stag markers. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 101, 1–26 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmad F Turki, Nidal H Abu-Hamdeh, Ahmad H Milyani, Turki AlQemlas, and Elias M Salilih. Develop a novel pid controller for an improved economizer in the air handling unit to cut the energy consumption for an office building in saudi arabia via genetic algorithm approach. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, page 104813, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zainab B Abdullah, Salam Waley Shneen, and Hashmia S Dakheel. Simulation model of pid controller for dc servo motor at variable and constant speed by using matlab. Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), 4(1):54–59, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, F., Liu, W., Luo, H.: Operational stability control of a buried pipeline maintenance robot using an improved pso-pid controller. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 138, 105178 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, T., Zheng, X., Xiao, H., Shan, C., Yao, X., Li, Y., Zhang, J.: Drying temperature precision control system based on improved neural network pid controller and variable-temperature drying experiment of cantaloupe slices. Plants 12(12), 2257 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, X., Bian, H., He, H., Li, F.: An improved differential evolution adaptive fuzzy pid control method for gravity measurement stable platform. Sensors 23(6), 3172 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A Paulo Moreira, José Lima, and Paulo Costa. Improving a position controller for a robotic joint. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), pages 97–103. IEEE, 2021

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohd Zaidi Mohd Tumari, Mohd Ashraf Ahmad, Mohd Helmi Suid, Mohd Riduwan Ghazali, and M Osman Tokhi. An improved marine predators algorithm tuned data-driven multiple-node hormone regulation neuroendocrine-pid controller for multi-input–multi-output gantry crane system. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, page 14613484231183938, 2023

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Paulo Moreira, José Lima, and Paulo Costa. Improving a position controller for a robotic joint. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), pages 97–103, 2021

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CeDRI (UIDB/05757/2020 and UIDP/05757/2020) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2021). The project that gave rise to these results received the support of a fellowship from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434). The fellowship code is LCF/BQ/DI20/11780028. This work has been supported by SmartHealth - Inteligência Artificial para Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados ao Longo da Vida, under the project ref. NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000045. In addition, the authors would like to thank the following Brazilian Agencies CEFET-RJ, CAPES, CNPq, and FAPERJ. This work was carried out under the Project Oleachain “Skills for sustainability and innovation in the value chain of traditional olive groves in the Northern Interior of Portugal” (Norte06-3559-FSE-000188), an operation to hire highly qualified human resources, funded by NORTE 2020 through the European Social Fund (ESF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Bonzatto Junior .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bonzatto Junior, L. et al. (2024). A Comparison of PID Controller Architectures Applied in Autonomous UAV Follow up of UGV. In: Marques, L., Santos, C., Lima, J.L., Tardioli, D., Ferre, M. (eds) Robot 2023: Sixth Iberian Robotics Conference. ROBOT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59167-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics