Skip to main content

Design and Usability Assessment of Multimodal Augmented Reality System for Gait Training

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robot 2023: Sixth Iberian Robotics Conference (ROBOT 2023)

Abstract

Biofeedback is a promising tool to complement conventional physical therapy by fostering active participation of neurologically impaired patients during treatment. This work aims at a user-centered design and usability assessment for different age groups of a novel wearable augmented reality application composed of a multimodal sensor network and corresponding control strategies for personalized biofeedback during gait training. The proposed solution includes wearable AR glasses that deliver visual cues controlled in real-time according to mediolateral center of mass position, sagittal ankle angle, or tibialis anterior muscle activity from inertial and EMG sensors. Control strategies include positive and negative reinforcement conditions and are based on the user’s performance by comparing real-time sensor data with an automatically user-personalized threshold. The proposed solution allows ambulatory practice on daily scenarios, physiotherapists’ involvement through a laptop screen, and contributes to further benchmark biofeedback regarding the type of sensor. Although old healthy adults with low academic degrees have a preference for guidance from an expert person, excellent usability scores (SUS scores: 81.25–96.87) were achieved with young and middle-aged healthy adults and one neurologically impaired patient.

This work was funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under the scholarship reference 2020.05709.BD, under the Stimulus of Scientific Employment with the grant 2020.03393.CEECIND, with the FAIR project under grant 2022.05844.PTDC, under the na-tional support to R&D units grant through the reference project UIDB/04436/2020 and UIDP/04436/2020.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mirelman, A, Shema, S., Maidan, I., Hausdorff, J.M.: Gait. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, pp. 119–134 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klamroth-Marganska, V.: Stroke Rehabilitation: Therapy Robots and Assistive Devices. In: Kerkhof, P.L.M., Miller, V.M. (eds.) Sex-Specific Analysis of Cardiovascular Function, pp. 579–587. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, H., Wolf, S.L., He, J.: Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 3, 11 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolf, S.L.: Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. Phys. Ther. 63, 1448–1459 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/63.9.1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kondo, K., Noonan, K.M., Freeman, M., et al.: Efficacy of biofeedback for medical conditions: an evidence map. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 34, 2883–2893 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05215-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson, L.A.: The role of biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation: past and future directions. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 14, 59–66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1404-59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinheiro, C., Figueiredo, J., Cerqueira, J., Santos, C.P.: Robotic biofeedback for post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a scoping review. Sensors 22, 7197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowman, T., Gervasoni, E., Arienti, C., et al.: Wearable devices for biofeedback rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis to design application rules and estimate the effectiveness on balance and gait outcomes in neurological diseases. Sensors 21, 3444 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spencer, J., Wolf, S.L., Kesar, T.M.: Biofeedback for Post-stroke Gait Retraining: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Directions in the Context of Emerging Technologies. Front. Neurol. 12, 637199 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Byl, N., Zhang, W., Coo, S., Tomizuka, M.: Clinical impact of gait training enhanced with visual kinematic biofeedback: patients with parkinson’s disease and patients stable post stroke. Neuropsychologia 79, 332–343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Held, J.P.O., Yu, K., Pyles, C., et al.: Augmented reality-based rehabilitation of gait impairments: case report. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8, e17804 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/17804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganesh, G., Takagi, A., Osu, R., et al.: Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci. Rep. 4, 3824 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giggins, O.M., Persson, U., Caulfield, B.: Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 10, 60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Afzal, M.R., Lee, H., Eizad, A., et al.: Effects of Vibrotactile biofeedback coding schemes on gait symmetry training of individuals with stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 27, 1617–1625 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2924682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mancini, M., Smulders, K., Harker, G., et al.: Assessment of the ability of open- and closed-loop cueing to improve turning and freezing in people with Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep. 8, 12773 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31156-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galea, J.M., Mallia, E., Rothwell, J., Diedrichsen, J.: The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 597–602 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Amri, M., Nicholas, K., Button, K., et al.: Inertial measurement units for clinical movement analysis: reliability and concurrent validity. Sensors 18, 719 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rech, K.D., Salazar, A.P., Marchese, R.R., et al.: Fugl-meyer assessment scores are related with kinematic measures in people with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 29, 104463 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung, K.S., Bang, H., In, T.S., Cho, H.Y.: Gait training with auditory feedback improves trunk control, muscle activation and dynamic balance in patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 33, 1–6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Santos, M.E.C., Taketomi, T., Sandor, C., et al.: A usability scale for handheld augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 167–176 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Figueiredo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pinheiro, C., Figueiredo, J., Pereira, T., Santos, C.P. (2024). Design and Usability Assessment of Multimodal Augmented Reality System for Gait Training. In: Marques, L., Santos, C., Lima, J.L., Tardioli, D., Ferre, M. (eds) Robot 2023: Sixth Iberian Robotics Conference. ROBOT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59167-9_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics