Skip to main content

Hidden Figures: Architectural Challenges to Expose Parameters Lost in Code

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2023 International Workshops and Doctoral Consortium (EICS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14517))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

Many critical user interaction design decisions are made in the heat of detailed development. These include simple parameter choices or more complex weightings in intelligent algorithms. Many would be appropriate for expert design review, user-preference choices or optimisation by machine learning, but they are buried deep in the code. Although the developer may realise this potential, the location of the decision is far removed in the code from where user feedback occurs, data can be collected and machine learning could be applied. This position paper describes several case studies and uses them to frame an architectural challenge for tools and infrastructure to uncover these hidden variables to make them available for machine learning and user inspection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown University: FreeCite – open source citation parser (2008). https://tinyurl.com/freecite. Accessed 29 May 2023

  2. Coutaz, J.: PAC, an object oriented model for dialog design. In: Human–Computer Interaction–INTERACT 1987, pp. 431–436. Elsevier (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crossref: REST API (2023). https://www.crossref.org/documentation/retrieve-metadata/rest-api/. Accessed 10 Dec 2023

  4. Crossref Labs: Resolving citations (we don’t need no Stinkin’ parser) (2017). Accessed 29 May 2023

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dix, A.: Context and action in search interfaces. In: Ceri, S., Brambilla, M. (eds.) Search Computing. LNCS, vol. 6585, pp. 35–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19668-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dix, A.: Designing user interactions with AI: servant, master or symbiosis. The AI Summit London (2021). https://www.alandix.com/academic/talks/AI-Summit-2021-UI-with-AI/

  7. Dix, A., Beale, R., Wood, A.: Architectures to make simple visualisations using simple systems. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2000, pp. 51–60. ACM (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/345513.345250

  8. Dix, A., Cowgill, R., Bashford, C., McVeigh, S., Ridgewell, R.: Spreadsheets as user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2016, pp. 192–195. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G.D., Beale, R.: Design focus: going with the grain. In: Human-Computer Interaction, p. 301. Pearson Education (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter, J.: Making the most of Java’s metadata, part 2: custom annotations. Oracle Technical Article (2023). https://www.oracle.com/technical-resources/articles/hunter-meta1.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2023

  11. Kiczales, G., et al.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: Akşit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053381

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Krasner, G.E., Pope, S.T., et al.: A description of the model-view-controller user interface paradigm in the Smalltalk-80 system. J. Object Orient. Program. 1(3), 26–49 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Microsoft: Extend metadata using attributes (2021). https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/attributes/. Accessed 10 Dec 2023

  14. Smiley, D., Pugh, E., Parisa, K., Mitchell, M.: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server. Packt Publishing Ltd. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Styger, E.: To-do lists with Eclipse tasks view (2016). https://mcuoneclipse.com/2016/05/24/to-do-lists-with-eclipse-tasks-view/. Accessed 10 Dec 2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Dix .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dix, A. (2024). Hidden Figures: Architectural Challenges to Expose Parameters Lost in Code. In: Harrison, M., et al. Engineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2023 International Workshops and Doctoral Consortium. EICS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14517. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59235-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59235-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59234-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59235-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics