Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Social Robot System for Performance-Oriented Stroke Therapy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2023 International Workshops and Doctoral Consortium (EICS 2023)

Abstract

Over the past few years, social robots have found utility in rehabilitative therapies across various fields. However, most of these studies did not incorporate extended clinical trials or focus on enhancing the health status of the patients with a medical stroke therapy. In this study, we present a research project in which a social robot serves as an instructor for stroke patients during their rehabilitation sessions. In this paper we briefly present our social robot application and focus on its evaluation. We provide an overview of relevant previous work and outline the system setup and experimental study. Lastly, we discuss our evaluation and conclude our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bundea, A., Bader, S., Forbrig, P.: Interaction and dialogue design of a humanoid social robot in an analogue neurorehabilitation application. In: Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C., Schmidt, R. (eds.) KES-HCIS 2021. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 244, pp. 76–85. Springer, Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3264-8_8

  2. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fasola, J., Mataric, M.: A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 2, 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.2.2.Fasola

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feingold-Polak, R., Barzel, O., Levy-Tzedek, S.: A robot goes to rehab: a novel gamified system for long-term stroke rehabilitation using a socially assistive robot-methodology and usability testing. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 18(1), 122 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00915-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forbrig, P., Bundea, A., Bader, S.: Engineering the interaction of a humanoid robot pepper with post-stroke patients during training tasks. In: Companion of the 2021 ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp. 38–43. ACM, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3459926.3464756

  7. Forbrig, P., Bundea, A., Pedersen, A., Platz, T.: Using a humanoid robot to assist post-stroke patients with standardized neurorehabilitation therapy. In: Nagar, A.K., Jat, D.S., Marín-Raventós, G., Mishra, D.K. (eds.) Intelligent Sustainable Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 334, pp. 19–28. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6369-7_3

  8. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(4), 361–375 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung, M., Lazaro, M.J.S., Yun, M.H.: Evaluation of methodologies and measures on the usability of social robots: a systematic review. Appl. Sci. 11(4), 1388 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koren, Y., Polak, R.F., Levy-Tzedek, S.: Extended interviews with stroke patients over a long-term rehabilitation using human-robot or human-computer interactions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 14(8), 1893–1911 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00909-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. AP Professional, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Polak, R.F., Levy-Tzedek, S.: A Robot Goes to Rehab: A Novel Gamified System for Stroke Rehabilitation using a Socially Assistive Robot: Methodology & Feasibility Testing (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singer, B., Garcia-Vega, J.: The Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale. J. Physiother. 63(1), 53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Gordon, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This joint research project “E-BRAiN - Evidence-based Robot Assistance in Neurorehabilitation” is supported by the European Social Fund (ESF), reference: ESF/14-BM-A55-0001/19-A01, and the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany. The sponsors had no role in the decision to publish or any content of the publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru Umlauft .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Umlauft, A., Forbrig, P. (2024). Evaluation of a Social Robot System for Performance-Oriented Stroke Therapy. In: Harrison, M., et al. Engineering Interactive Computer Systems. EICS 2023 International Workshops and Doctoral Consortium. EICS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14517. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59235-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59235-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59234-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59235-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics