Skip to main content

Abstract

Recent advancements in digital technology have significantly impacted healthcare, with the rise of chatbots as a promising avenue for healthcare services. These chatbots aim to provide prevention, diagnosis, and treatment services, thereby reducing the workload on medical professionals. Despite this trend, limited research has explored the variables influencing user experiences in the design of healthcare chatbots. While the impact of visual representation within chatbot systems is recognized, existing studies have primarily focused on efficiency and accuracy, neglecting graphical interfaces and non-verbal visual communication tools. This research aims to delve into user experience aspects of symptom checker chatbots, including identity design, interface layout, and visual communication mechanisms. Data was collected through a comprehensive questionnaire involving three distinct chatbots (Healthily, Mediktor and Adele – a self-developed solution) and underwent meticulous analysis, yielding valuable insights to aid the decision process when designing effective chatbots for symptom checking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ceney, A., Tolond, S., Glowinski, A., Marks, B., Swift, S., Palser, T.: “Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation”, (in eng). PLoS ONE 16(7), e0254088 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Put the horse before the cart: Investing in health requires investing in health workforce. https://health.ec.europa.eu/other-pages/basic-page/health-eu-newsletter-250-focus_en#:~:text=There%20is%20an%20estimated%20shortage,leaving%20other%20countries%20with%20shortages. Accessed 12 Apr 2023

  3. Espinoza, J., Crown, K., Kulkarni, O.: A guide to chatbots for COVID-19 screening at pediatric health care facilities. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 6(2), e18808 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morse, K.E., Ostberg, N.P., Jones, V.G., Chan, A.S.: Use characteristics and triage acuity of a digital symptom checker in a large integrated health system: population-based descriptive study,” (in eng). J. Med. Internet Res. 22(11), e20549 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/20549

  5. Martin, A., et al.: An artificial intelligence-based first-line defence against COVID-19: digitally screening citizens for risks via a chatbot. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–7 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almalki, M.: Perceived utilities of COVID-19 related chatbots in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Acta Informatica Medica 28(3), 218 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Denecke, K., May, R.: Usability assessment of conversational agents in healthcare: a literature review, pp. 169–173 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Følstad, A., Brandtzæg, P.B.: Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions 24(4), 38–42 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McDuff, D., Czerwinski, M.: Designing emotionally sentient agents. Commun. ACM 61, 74–83 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, J., Miller, C., Hancock, P., De Visser, E.J., Dorneich, M.: Politeness in machine-human and human-human interaction. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 60, 279–283 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Félix, B., Ribeiro, J.: Understanding People’s Expectations When Designing a Chatbot for Cancer Patients, vol. 13171. Springer, Cham (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brahnam, S., De Angeli, A.: Gender affordances of conversational agents. Interact. Comput. 24, 139–153 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davenport, T.H., Ronanki, R.: Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harv. Bus. Rev.. Bus. Rev. 96(1), 108–116 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barriga, E.M., Ferrer, I.P., Sánchez, M.S., Baranera, M.M., Utset, J.M.: Experiencia de Mediktor®: un nuevo evaluador de síntomas basado en inteligencia artificial para pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias. Emergencias: Revista de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias 29(6), 391–396 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Campos Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Campos Ferreira, M., Veloso, M., Tavares, J.M.R.S. (2024). A Comprehensive Examination of User Experience in AI-Based Symptom Checker Chatbots. In: Duarte, S.P., Lobo, A., Delibašić, B., Kamissoko, D. (eds) Decision Support Systems XIV. Human-Centric Group Decision, Negotiation and Decision Support Systems for Societal Transitions. ICDSST 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 506. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59376-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59376-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59375-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59376-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics