Abstract
With the recent COVID-19 pandemic, students have reported that online classes not only lack effective teaching practices, but there is also an absence of the collaborative learning aspect that provides students with the ability to have quality interactions with one another and stay engaged (Dumford & Miller, 2018). The purpose of the current study was to assess the efficacy of animated and digital human avatars in comparison to traditional instructors in lecture videos. Data from 58 participants were analyzed. Participants were instructed to watch a total of four 4–7 min instructional videos and answer comprehension questions. The four videos in each condition consisted of two “Easy” Content and two “Hard” Content videos with the respective instructor type in that condition. After viewing a video, participants were asked to rate how much mental effort they devoted to understanding the information presented, and fill out questionnaires about their perceived engagement, trust in the avatar, and perceived usability of the instructional video. The results showed participants scored higher on the quizzes when the video content was hard than when it was easy. Participants also scored higher on the quiz when the video was presented with the human professor than the digital human professor. These results suggest that students may be more engaged, and as a result, showed higher quiz scores with the videos when the topic is more complex or when a human professor was present.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alblehai, F.M.: Individual experience and engagement in avatar-mediated environments: the mediating effect of interpersonal attraction. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 60(4), 986–1007 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211051023
Aldossari, S., Altalhab, S.: Distance learning during COVID-19: EFL students’ engagement and motivation from teachers’ perspective. English Lang. Teach. 15(7), 85–109 (2022). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1352566
Bai, X., Vu, K.P.L.: Online learning: does integrated video lecture help you learn more efficiently?. In: Duffy, V.G., Lehto, M., Yih, Y., Proctor, R.W. (eds.) Human-Automation Interaction. Automation, Collaboration, & E-Services, vol. 10, pp. 531–548. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10780-1_29
Bashir, A., Bashir, S., Rana, K., Lambert, P., Vernallis, A.: Post-COVID-19 adaptations; The shifts towards online learning, hybrid course delivery and the implications for biosciences courses in the higher education setting. Front. Educ. 6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.711619
Blake, A.M., Moseley, J.L.: The emerging technology of avatars: some educational considerations. Educ. Technol. 13–20 (2010). https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429772
Bruya, B., Tang, Y.Y.: Is attention really effort? Revisiting Daniel Kahneman’s influential 1973 book attention and effort. Front. Psychol. 9, 1133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01133
Costley, J., Fanguy, M., Lange, C., Baldwin, M.: The effects of video lecture viewing strategies on cognitive load. J. Comput. High. Educ. 33, 19–38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09254-y
Darejeh, A., Marcus, N., Sweller, J.: The effect of narrative-based E-learning systems on novice users’ cognitive load while learning software applications. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 69, 2451–2473 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10024-5
Dumford, A.D., Miller, A.L.: Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J. Comput. High. Educ. 30, 452–465 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Gunasekara, A., Turner, K., Fung, C.Y., Stough, C.: Impact of lecturers’ emotional intelligence on students’ learning and engagement in remote learning spaces: a cross-cultural study. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 38(4), 112–126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7848
Hsieh, R., Shirai, A., Sato, H.: Effectiveness of facial animated avatar and voice transformer in elearning programming course. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Posters, 1–2 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1145/3306214.3338540
Hsu, J.: Why uncanny valley human look alikes put us on edge. Sci. Am. (2012). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-uncanny-valley-human-look-alikes-put-us-on-edge/
Jensen, S.A.: In-class versus online video lectures: similar learning outcomes, but a preference for in-class. Teach. Psychol. 38(4), 298–302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311421336
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4(1), 53–71 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327566ijce0401_04
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., Llinas, J.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Technical report CMIF198. Air Force Research Laboratory (1998). http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA395339
Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort, vol. 1063, pp. 218–226. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)
Kao, D., Harrell, D.F.: Exploring the effects of dynamic avatar on performance and engagement in educational games (2016). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321994584_Exploring_the_Effects_of_Dynamic_Avatar_on_Performance_and_Engagement_in_Educational_Games
Kao, D.: The effects of anthropomorphic avatars vs. non-anthropomorphic avatars in a jumping game. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 1–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3337722.3341829
Koschate, M., Potter, R., Bremner, P., Levine, M.: Overcoming the uncanny valley: displays of emotions reduce the uncanniness of humanlike robots. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 359–366. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451773
Lewis, J.R.: The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 34(7), 577–590 (2018)
Nizam, M.D., Rudiyansah, N.D., Tuah, M.N., Sani, H.A.Z.: Avatar design types and user engagement in digital educational games during evaluation phase. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 12(6), 6449–6460 (2022). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i6.pp6449-6460s
Palvia, S., et al.: Online education: worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 21(4), 233–241 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262
Pass, F.G.W.C.: Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive load approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 84(4), 429–434 (1992)
Quesada-Pallarès, C., Sánchez-Martí, A., Ciraso-Calí, A., Pineda-Herrero, P.: Online vs. classroom learning: examining motivational and self-regulated learning strategies among vocational education and training students. Front. Psychol. 10, 2795 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02795
Santos-Guevara, N.B., Rincón-Flores, E.G.: Avatars and badges, are there differences between genders? In: 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, pp. 334–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454126
Schacter, D.L., Szpunar, K.K.: Enhancing attention and memory during video-recorded lectures. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol. 1(1), 60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000011
Schöbel, S., Janson, A., Mishra, A.: A configurational view on avatar design–the role of emotional attachment, satisfaction, and cognitive load in digital learning. In: Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems, Munich (2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3524079
Segaran, K., Mohamad Ali, A.Z., Hoe, T.W.: Does avatar design in educational games promote a positive emotional experience among learners? E-Learn. Digit. Media 18(5), 422–440 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753021994337
Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N.M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., Roll, I.: Video-based learning activity engagement measure [database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS (2021). https://doi.org/10.1037/t81381-000
Seymour, M., Yuan, L. I., Dennis, A., Riemer, K.: Have we crossed the uncanny valley? Understanding affinity, trustworthiness, and preference for realistic digital humans in immersive environments. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00674
Stein, J.P., Ohler, P.: Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind—the influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting. Cognition 160, 43–50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.010
Tinwell, A., Nabi, D.A., Charlton, J.P.: Perception of psychopathy and the uncanny valley in virtual characters. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1617–1625 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.008
Wang, J., Antonenko, P.D.: Instructor presence in instructional video: effects on visual attention, recall, and perceived learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 79–89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hoang, C., Miles, J.D., Vu, KP.L. (2024). Effectiveness of Digital Avatars in Student Engagement and Learning. In: Mori, H., Asahi, Y. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14691. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60125-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60125-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60124-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60125-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)