Skip to main content

Instructor Avatars and Virtual Learning: How Does Instructor Type and Gender Affect Student Perceptions and Learning Outcomes?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interface and the Management of Information (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14691))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 301 Accesses

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of instructor gender (male versus female), type (human versus avatar), and lesson difficulty (easy and difficult) on the usability, trust, engagement, and comprehension of a virtual learning platform system. The study utilized animation software to create virtual male and female instructors and embedded them into a university psychology lecture on memory. Comprehension was evaluated through the use of multiple-choice tests, while usability, trust, and engagement were measured using the System Usability Scale, Trust in Automation Scale, and Paas Mental Effort Scale questionnaires, respectively. The results indicated no causal effect between instructor gender or type on comprehension, usability, and engagement. However, the study did reveal a significant effect of lesson difficulty on trust in the instructor, such that trust in the instructor was significantly higher following the difficult lesson. Implications of these findings pertain to the educational design of virtual classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anthony Jnr, B., Noel, S.: Examining the adoption of emergency remote teaching and virtual learning during and after COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 35(6), 1136–1150 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vila-Vázquez, G., Castro-Casal, C., Álvarez-Pérez, D.: From LMX to individual creativity: Interactive effect of engagement and job complexity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(8), 2626 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schauer, A.M., Fillingim, K.B., Pavleszek, A., Chen, M., Fu, K.: Comparing the effect of virtual and in-person instruction on students’ performance in a design for additive manufacturing learning activity. Res. Eng. Design 33(4), 385–394 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Halloran, Jack, Okun, J., Oster, E.: Pandemic schooling mode and student test scores: Evidence from US states. National Bureau of Economic Research (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woolf, B.P.: Collaborative inquiry tutors. Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors, pp.  298–336 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dehn, D.S.M., Van Mulken, S.: The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. Inter. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 52(1), 1–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacArthur, K.: Dispositional Trust Response to Morphological Differences in Synthetic Representative Agents. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baylor, A. L.,  Kim, Y.: Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. Intell. Tutoring Syst. 592–603 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rezvani, R.,  Miri, P,: The impact of gender, nativeness, and subject matter on the English as a second language university students’ perception of instructor credibility and Engagement: a qualitative study. Front. Psychol. 12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, T. L., Zerbinos, E:. Gender roles in animated cartoons: has the picture changed in 20 years? Sex Roles 32(9–10), 651–673 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., Hunt, A.N.: What’s in a name: exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innov. High. Educ. 40(4), 291–303 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, H.R.: Student evaluations of college instructors: effects of type of course taught, instructor gender and gender role, and student gender. J. Educ. Psychol. 86(4), 627–630 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spencer, M., Gilmour, A.F., Miller, A.C., Emerson, A.M., Saha, N.M., Cutting, L.E.: Understanding the influence of text complexity and question type on reading outcomes. Read. Writ. 32(3), 603–637 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andres, H.P.: Active teaching to manage course difficulty and learning motivation. J. Further Higher Educ., 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, M.A., Alarcon, G.M.,  Capiola, A.: I think you are trustworthy, need I say more? the factor structure and practicalities of trustworthiness assessment. Front. Psychol. 13, 9 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  16. England, B.J., Brigati, J.R., Schussler, E.E., Chen, M.M.: Student anxiety and perception of difficulty impact performance and persistence in introductory biology courses. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 18(2) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A.,  Pachman, M.: Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in Learning: An integrative review. Front. Educ. 3 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Namaziandost, E., Esfahani, F.R., Ahmadi, S.: Varying levels of difficulty in L2 reading materials in the efl classroom: impact on comprehension and motivation. Cogent Educ. 6(1), 1615740 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bedekar, M., Joshi, P.: Cartoon Films and its impact on children’s mentality. Res. Rev. Inter. J. Multidisciplinary 05(06), 13–18 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vu, J.: Memory [Lecture]. California State University, Long Beach, CA (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brooke, J.: SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis, J.R.: The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. Inter. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 34(7), 577–590 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.,  Llinas, J.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in Automated Systems (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gutzwiller, R.S., Chiou, E.K., Craig, S.D., Lewis, C.M., Lematta, G.J.,  Hsiung, C.-P.: Positive bias in the ‘Trust in Automated Systems Survey’? an examination of the jian et al. (2000) scale. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 217–221 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paas, F.G.W.C.: Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 84, 429–434 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., Van Gerven, P.W.: Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 63–71 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Antecol, H., Eren, O.,  Ozbeklik, S.: The effect of teacher gender on Student Achievement in Primary School: Evidence from a randomized experiment. SSRN Electr. J. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Milgram, S.: Behavioral study of obedience. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 67(4), 371–378 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Selvaraj, A., Radhin, V., Ka, N., Benson, N., Mathew, A.J.: Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. Inter. J. Educ. Developm. 85, 102444. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Miles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Phillips, K., Hancock, G., Miles, J.D. (2024). Instructor Avatars and Virtual Learning: How Does Instructor Type and Gender Affect Student Perceptions and Learning Outcomes?. In: Mori, H., Asahi, Y. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14691. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60125-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60125-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60124-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60125-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics