Skip to main content

Exploring ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for Business Process Models Semantic Quality Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Good Practices and New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 987))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

Business process modeling aims to enhance the comprehension of company processes, enabling decision-makers to attain strategic objectives. Nevertheless, inexperienced systems analysts who lack domain knowledge may produce low-quality models, thereby impacting the overall effectiveness of the modeling process. Large language models are bringing about a revolutionary transformation in the application of knowledge within various domains. This paper presents preliminary experimental findings on the potential application of Large language models in Business Process Modeling semantic quality improvement, specifically focusing on the extent to which these technologies can aid the modeler by suggesting improvements. In our study, we delve into the knowledge of GPT-4, a powerful language model. We aim to investigate its capabilities by employing various combinations of prompts, incorporating proposed textual syntax, and integrating contextual domain knowledge. Our objective is to leverage these approaches to improve the quality of business process models. Our findings indicate that the knowledge generated by GPT-4 is predominantly generic, encompassing ambiguous and general concepts that extend beyond the specific domain. However, when we apply our proposed prompting techniques, we observe a notable improvement in the specificity and comprehensiveness of the results. The utilization of these prompts helps to refine the generated knowledge, leading to more specific and comprehensive outcomes that align closely with the intended domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aa, H., Di Ciccio, C., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: Extracting declarative process models from natural language. In: Giorgini, P., Weber, B. (eds.) CAiSE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11483, pp. 365–382. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. de Almeida Bordignon, A.C., Thom, L.H., Silva, T.S., Dani, V.S., Fantinato, M., Ferreira, R.C.B.: Natural language processing in business process identification and modeling: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellan, P., Dragoni, M., Ghidini, C.: Process extraction from text: state of the art and challenges for the future. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03754 (2021)

  4. Bellan, P., Dragoni, M., Ghidini, C.: Extracting business process entities and relations from text using pre-trained language models and in-context learning. In: Almeida, J.P.A., Karastoyanova, D., Guizzardi, G., Montali, M., Maggi, F.M., Fonseca, C.M. (eds.) EDOC 2022. LNCS, vol. 13585, pp. 182–199. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17604-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, T., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. DAIR.AI: Basics of prompting (2023). Accessed 31 Oct 2023

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira, R.C.B., Thom, L.H., Fantinato, M.: A semi-automatic approach to identify business process elements in natural language texts. In: International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 2, pp. 250–261. SCITEPRESS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Honkisz, K., Kluza, K., Wiśniewski, P.: A concept for generating business process models from natural language description. In: Liu, W., Giunchiglia, F., Yang, B. (eds.) KSEM 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11061, pp. 91–103. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99365-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kojima, T., Gu, S.S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., Iwasawa, Y.: Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 22199–22213 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krogstie, J., Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G.: Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In: Information System Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views, pp. 216–231 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leopold, H., Mendling, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: Generating natural language texts from business process models. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Maqbool, B., et al.: A comprehensive investigation of BPMN models generation from textual requirements—techniques, tools and trends. In: Kim, K.J., Baek, N. (eds.) ICISA 2018. LNEE, vol. 514, pp. 543–557. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1056-0_54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Narang, S., Raffel, C., Lee, K., Roberts, A., Fiedel, N., Malkan, K.: Wt5?! Training text-to-text models to explain their predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.14546 (2020)

  14. Rolland, C., Proix, C.: A natural language approach for requirements engineering. In: Loucopoulos, P. (ed.) CAiSE 1992. LNCS, vol. 593, pp. 257–277. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. SBVR, O.: Semantics of business vocabulary and business rules (SBVR), version 1.0 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sholiq, S., Sarno, R., Astuti, E.S.: Generating BPMN diagram from textual requirements. J. King Saud University-Comput. Inf. Sci. 34(10), 10079–10093 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Si-Said Cherfi, S., Ayad, S., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Improving business process model quality using domain ontologies. J. Data Semant. 2, 75–87 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, J., et al.: Prompt engineering for healthcare: methodologies and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14670 (2023)

  19. Wei, J., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 24824–24837 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Author would like to thank Arab Open University for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Ayad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ayad, S., AlSayoud, F. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for Business Process Models Semantic Quality Improvement. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Poniszewska-Marańda, A. (eds) Good Practices and New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 987. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60221-4_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics