Skip to main content

Social Usability Evaluation of Douyin and TikTok

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14687))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 869 Accesses

Abstract

Social usability is an indicator of how easily social activities are performed on a platform. It also determines user motivations to engage in community software over the long term. Douyin and TikTok are two popular mobile social networking applications. Douyin is the original version of the application, available only in China, while TikTok is its international counterpart. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to examine the social usability of Douyin and TikTok from the perspectives of social atmosphere, purposes and interests, richness of interaction, self-presentation, and support for formal interaction; and (2) to propose design recommendations to increase user engagement. In this study, forty Douyin/TikTok users were recruited to complete the social usability questionnaire and received follow-up semi-structured interviews. Independent sample t-tests were conducted on the rating score of each questionnaire item. Content analysis was conducted on participants’ verbal responses in the interview. Results showed that both applications received high ratings (over four on a scale of one to five) for “media richness in communication,” “ease of building identity,” and “ease of operation,” and low ratings (less than three) for “users feeling close to each other,” “users treating each other with mutual respect and courtesy,” and “accuracy of information.“ Results also showed a significant difference in the rating score of “Return on efforts.“ To enhance social usability and further foster customer loyalty, this study made design recommendations to address user experience issues in social atmosphere and accuracy of information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Vinitzky, G.: Social network use and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1289–1295 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng, Y.L., Chen, C.C., Shu-Ming, Wu.: Evaluation of charm factors of short video user experience using FAHP – a case study of Tik Tok app. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 688(5), 055068 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/688/5/055068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari, A., Bimo, S.: TikTok and the “algorithmized self”: a new model of online interaction. AoIR Sel. Papers Internet Res. (2020).https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11172

  4. Auxier, B., Anderson, M.: Social media use in 2021. Pew Res. Cent. 1, 1–4 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Omar, B., Dequan, W.: Watch, share or create: the influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. (IJIM) 14(04), 121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Xu., Yan, X., Zhang, Z.: Research on the causes of the TikTok app becoming popular and the existing problems. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 7(2), 59–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18178/joams.7.2.59-63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapoor, K.K., et al.: Advances in social media research: past, present and future. Inf. Syst. Front. 20(3), 531–558 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Evers, V., Day, D.: The role of culture in interface acceptance. In: Howard, S., Hammond, J., Lindgaard, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 1997, pp. 260–267. Springer US, Boston, MA (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, Q., et al.: Understanding factors affecting perceived sociability of social software. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1846–1861 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, C.S., Ma, L.: News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(2), 331–339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boulianne, S.: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(5), 524–538 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grabowicz, P.A., et al.: Social features of online networks: the strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS ONE 7(1), e29358 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, C.-Y., Ku, Y.-C.: The power of a thumbs-up: will e-commerce switch to social commerce? Inf. Manage. 55(3), 340–357 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phang, C., Kankanhalli, A., Sabherwal, R.: Usability and sociability in online communities: a comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(10), 721–747 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, D.C.: Online social network acceptance: a social perspective. Internet Res. 21(5), 562–580 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nadeau, R., Cloutier, E., Guay, J.H.: New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 14(2), 203–213 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu, M.-H., et al.: Understanding the roles of cultural differences and socio-economic status in social media continuance intention. Inf. Technol. People 28(1), 224–241 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Khaddam, I., Vanderdonckt, J.: Towards a culture-adaptable user-interface architecture. Int. J. User-Syst. Inter. 7(2), 161 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Giacoma, G., Casali, D F.: Social Usability Workshop at Frontiers of Interaction (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frontiers of Interaction 2010. Retrieved 27 Jun 2010. https://www.slideshare.net/folletto/social-usability-workshop-at-frontiers-of-interaction-2010

  21. WARM: The difference between TikTok and Douyin is actually quite significant? Get to know these two different traffic pools. Retrieved 31 Aug 2023 (2023). https://tiktok01.com/article/tiktok-vibrato-difference/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hsiu Hung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hung, YH., Chiang, PC. (2024). Social Usability Evaluation of Douyin and TikTok. In: Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14687. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60441-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60441-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60440-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60441-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics