Abstract
Social usability is an indicator of how easily social activities are performed on a platform. It also determines user motivations to engage in community software over the long term. Douyin and TikTok are two popular mobile social networking applications. Douyin is the original version of the application, available only in China, while TikTok is its international counterpart. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to examine the social usability of Douyin and TikTok from the perspectives of social atmosphere, purposes and interests, richness of interaction, self-presentation, and support for formal interaction; and (2) to propose design recommendations to increase user engagement. In this study, forty Douyin/TikTok users were recruited to complete the social usability questionnaire and received follow-up semi-structured interviews. Independent sample t-tests were conducted on the rating score of each questionnaire item. Content analysis was conducted on participants’ verbal responses in the interview. Results showed that both applications received high ratings (over four on a scale of one to five) for “media richness in communication,” “ease of building identity,” and “ease of operation,” and low ratings (less than three) for “users feeling close to each other,” “users treating each other with mutual respect and courtesy,” and “accuracy of information.“ Results also showed a significant difference in the rating score of “Return on efforts.“ To enhance social usability and further foster customer loyalty, this study made design recommendations to address user experience issues in social atmosphere and accuracy of information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Vinitzky, G.: Social network use and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1289–1295 (2010)
Feng, Y.L., Chen, C.C., Shu-Ming, Wu.: Evaluation of charm factors of short video user experience using FAHP – a case study of Tik Tok app. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 688(5), 055068 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/688/5/055068
Bhandari, A., Bimo, S.: TikTok and the “algorithmized self”: a new model of online interaction. AoIR Sel. Papers Internet Res. (2020).https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11172
Auxier, B., Anderson, M.: Social media use in 2021. Pew Res. Cent. 1, 1–4 (2021)
Omar, B., Dequan, W.: Watch, share or create: the influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. (IJIM) 14(04), 121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429
Li, Xu., Yan, X., Zhang, Z.: Research on the causes of the TikTok app becoming popular and the existing problems. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 7(2), 59–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18178/joams.7.2.59-63
Kapoor, K.K., et al.: Advances in social media research: past, present and future. Inf. Syst. Front. 20(3), 531–558 (2018)
Evers, V., Day, D.: The role of culture in interface acceptance. In: Howard, S., Hammond, J., Lindgaard, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 1997, pp. 260–267. Springer US, Boston, MA (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_44
Gao, Q., et al.: Understanding factors affecting perceived sociability of social software. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1846–1861 (2010)
Lee, C.S., Ma, L.: News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(2), 331–339 (2012)
Boulianne, S.: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(5), 524–538 (2015)
Grabowicz, P.A., et al.: Social features of online networks: the strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS ONE 7(1), e29358 (2012)
Li, C.-Y., Ku, Y.-C.: The power of a thumbs-up: will e-commerce switch to social commerce? Inf. Manage. 55(3), 340–357 (2018)
Phang, C., Kankanhalli, A., Sabherwal, R.: Usability and sociability in online communities: a comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(10), 721–747 (2009)
Li, D.C.: Online social network acceptance: a social perspective. Internet Res. 21(5), 562–580 (2011)
Nadeau, R., Cloutier, E., Guay, J.H.: New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 14(2), 203–213 (1993)
Hsu, M.-H., et al.: Understanding the roles of cultural differences and socio-economic status in social media continuance intention. Inf. Technol. People 28(1), 224–241 (2015)
Khaddam, I., Vanderdonckt, J.: Towards a culture-adaptable user-interface architecture. Int. J. User-Syst. Inter. 7(2), 161 (2014)
Giacoma, G., Casali, D F.: Social Usability Workshop at Frontiers of Interaction (2010)
Frontiers of Interaction 2010. Retrieved 27 Jun 2010. https://www.slideshare.net/folletto/social-usability-workshop-at-frontiers-of-interaction-2010
WARM: The difference between TikTok and Douyin is actually quite significant? Get to know these two different traffic pools. Retrieved 31 Aug 2023 (2023). https://tiktok01.com/article/tiktok-vibrato-difference/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hung, YH., Chiang, PC. (2024). Social Usability Evaluation of Douyin and TikTok. In: Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14687. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60441-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60441-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60440-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60441-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)