Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

How StarCraft II Players Cope with Toxicity: Insights from Player Interviews

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Games (HCII 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14731))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 513 Accesses

Abstract

Toxicity in the context of online interactions is understood as an umbrella term describing negativity-inducing and harmful behaviours. Despite multiple efforts, user’s toxic behaviour remains rampant particularly in multiplayer online games with real-time high fidelity social affordances. In this work, we conducted player interviews among StarCraft II players to understand how they cope with toxicity that they experience while playing. We approached the data inductively, and discovered both emotion-focused and problem-focused coping strategies. We sorted the discovered forms of coping into eight categories (such as functional detachment and affective detachment). Our findings offer new empirical perspectives on coping in multiplayer online games. This work sheds light on the strategies that players opt for managing stressors arising from toxicity, and can help in the design of measures that better enable players to shield themselves from harmful interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Activision-Blizzard: StarCraft II. Game [PC/OS-X], blizzard Entertainment, Irvine, California, USA, July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Activision-Blizzard: Hearthstone. Game [PC/OS-X/iOS/Android], blizzard Entertainment, Irvine, California, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adinolf, S., Turkay, S.: Toxic behaviors in esports games: player perceptions and coping strategies. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, pp. 365–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3271545

  4. Altarriba Bertran, F., Buruk, O., Hamari, J.: From-the-wild: towards co-designing for and from nature. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, pp. 1–7 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anubha, Islam, J.U.: Unveiling key gratifications and stimuli to engage generation z with multiplayer online games. J. Internet Commer., 1–29 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2022.2088037

  6. Beres, N.A., Frommel, J., Reid, E., Mandryk, R.L., Klarkowski, M.: Don’t you know that you’re toxic: normalization of toxicity in online gaming. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beres, N.A., Klarkowski, M., Mandryk, R.L.: Playing with emotions: a systematic review examining emotions and emotion regulation in esports performance. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI PLAY), vol. 7, pp. 558–587 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3611041

  8. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health. 11(4), 589–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, K., Uhm, J.P., Kim, S., Lee, H.W.: Paradoxical relationship between esports toxicity and toxicity tolerance: moderated mediation by gender and positive reappraisal coping. Int. J. Sports Mark. Spons. 24, 737–752 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Valve Corporation and Nexon and Gamania Digital and Vivendi: Counter Strike: Global Offensive. Game [PC] (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cote, A.C.: “I can defend myself” women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online. Games Cult. 12(2), 136–155 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Respawn Entertainment and Panic Button Games: Apex Legends. Game [PC/OS-X/Switch/PS4/PS5/XBOXOne] (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fox, J., Tang, W.Y.: Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New Media Soc. 19(8), 1290–1307 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frommel, J., Johnson, D., Mandryk, R.L.: How perceived toxicity of gaming communities is associated with social capital, satisfaction of relatedness, and loneliness. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 10, 100302 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frommel, J., Klarkowski, M., Mandryk, R.L.: The struggle is spiel: on failure and success in games. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 1–12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frommel, J., Mandryk, R.L.: Individual control over exposure to combat toxicity in games. ACM Games Res. Pract. 1(4), 1–3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3633768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riot Games: League of Legends. Game [PC/OS-X] (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kordyaka, B., Kruse, B.: Curing toxicity-developing design principles to buffer toxic behaviour in massive multiplayer online games. Safer Communities 20(3), 133–149 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kordyaka, B., Laato, S., Jahn, K., Hamari, J., Niehaves, B.: The cycle of toxicity: exploring relationships between personality and player roles in toxic behavior in multiplayer online battle arena games. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction(CHI PLAY), vol. 7, pp. 611–641 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3611043

  20. Kordyaka, B., Laato, S., Niehaves, B.: A toxic triad: aggression anger and authoritarianism - a study with multiplaye ronline battle arena game players. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual International GamiFIN Conference 2024 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kordyaka, B., Laato, S., Weber, S., Niehaves, B.: What constitutes victims of toxicity-identifying drivers of toxic victimhood in multiplayer online battle arena games. Front. Psychol. 14, 1193172 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kordyaka, B., Park, S., Krath, J., Laato, S.: Exploring the relationship between offline cultural environments and toxic behavior tendencies in multiplayer online games. ACM Trans. Soc. Comput. 6, 1–20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3580346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kordyaka, B., Pumplun, L., Brunnhofer, M., Kruse, B., Laato, S.: Gender disparities in esports-an explanatory mixed-methods approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 149, 107956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laato, S., Fernández Galeote, D., Altarriba Bertran, F., Papangelis, K., Hamari, J.: How location-based games incentivize moving about: a study in the context of nature-going. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI PLAY), vol. 7, pp. 642–664 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3611044

  25. Laato, S., Kordyaka, B., Hamari, J.: A review of studies on location-based live-service games during the Covid-19 pandemic: players’ behavior and reluctance to return to the pre-pandemic state. In: Gaming and Gamers in Times of Pandemic, p. 155 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Laato, S., Kordyaka, B., Hamari, J.: Traumatizing or just annoying? Unveiling the spectrum of gamer toxicity in the starcraft II community. In: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642137

  27. Laato, S., Rauti, S., Hamari, J.: Resemblance of religion and pervasive games: a study among church employees and gamers. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581056

  28. Laato, S., Rauti, S., Islam, A.N., Sutinen, E.: Why playing augmented reality games feels meaningful to players? The roles of imagination and social experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 121, 106816 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Laato, S., Xi, N., Spors, V., Thibault, M., Hamari, J.: Making sense of reality: a mapping of terminology related to virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality, XR and the metaverse. In: Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lazarus, R.S.: Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosom. Med. 55(3), 234–247 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lazarus, R.S.: Toward better research on stress and coping. Am. Psychol. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S.: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Maroney, N., Williams, B.J., Thomas, A., Skues, J., Moulding, R.: A stress-coping model of problem online video game use. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict. 17, 845–858 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McLean, L., Griffiths, M.D.: Female gamers’ experience of online harassment and social support in online gaming: a qualitative study. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Addict. 17, 970–994 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Passmore, C.J., Mandryk, R.: An about face: diverse representation in games. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 365–380 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Passmore, C.J., Mandryk, R.L.: A taxonomy of coping strategies and discriminatory stressors in digital gaming. Front. Comput. Sci. 2, 40 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Plante, C.N., Gentile, D.A., Groves, C.L., Modlin, A., Blanco-Herrera, J.: Video games as coping mechanisms in the etiology of video game addiction. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult. 8(4), 385 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Poeller, S., Dechant, M.J., Klarkowski, M., Mandryk, R.L.: Suspecting sarcasm: how league of legends players dismiss positive communication in toxic environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI PLAY), vol. 7, pp. 1–26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3611020

  39. Reid, E., Mandryk, R.L., Beres, N.A., Klarkowski, M., Frommel, J.: Feeling good and in control: in-game tools to support targets of toxicity. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI PLAY), vol. 6, pp. 1–27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3549498

  40. Reid, E., Mandryk, R.L., Beres, N.A., Klarkowski, M., Frommel, J.: “Bad vibrations”: sensing toxicity from in-game audio features. IEEE Trans. Games 14(4), 558–568 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2022.3176849

  41. Spors, V., Kaufman, I.: Respawn, reload, relate: exploring the self-care possibilities for mental health in games through a humanistic lens. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI PLAY), vol. 5, pp. 1–31 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Statista: Global video game market value from 2020 to 2025 (2023). https://www.statista.com/statistics/292056/video-game-market-value-worldwide/

  43. Suler, J.: The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 7(3), 321–326 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Supercell: Clash Royale. Game [Android/iOS] (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thompson, J.J., Leung, B.H., Blair, M.R., Taboada, M.: Sentiment analysis of player chat messaging in the video game StarCraft 2: extending a lexicon-based model. Knowl.-Based Syst. 137, 149–162 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Türkay, S., Formosa, J., Adinolf, S., Cuthbert, R., Altizer, R.: See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: how collegiate players define, experience and cope with toxicity. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376191

  47. Wijkstra, M., Rogers, K., Mandryk, R.L., Veltkamp, R.C., Frommel, J.: Help, my game is toxic! First insights from a systematic literature review on intervention systems for toxic behaviors in online video games. In: Companion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 3–9 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gamification Group, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Samuli Laato, Velvet Spors & Juho Hamari

  2. University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Bastian Kordyaka

Authors
  1. Samuli Laato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bastian Kordyaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Velvet Spors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juho Hamari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuli Laato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Xiaowen Fang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laato, S., Kordyaka, B., Spors, V., Hamari, J. (2024). How StarCraft II Players Cope with Toxicity: Insights from Player Interviews. In: Fang, X. (eds) HCI in Games. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14731. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60695-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60695-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60694-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60695-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics